Until this revision,
this was possible to set as parent task the current task.
From then, it was impossible to compute the field
`subtask_count` because of an infinite loop.
This resulted to the inability to open the task
form, which contains this field.
opw-1847982
- Activate sub-tasks in projects
- Enter a project's tasks, click on the stat button 'Sub-tasks'
- Reload the page (F5)
A traceback occurs since `project_id` is undefined.
The fields `project_id` and `partner_id` are only defined in the context
of the stat button.
opw-1844334
The portal view for tasks previously listed all task of all projects
without grouping them. It was a problem, mainly when we want to make
the distinction on project label_tasks, to make the difference
between tasks, issues, ... Grouping task by project by default allows
to show the label_tasks before each project.
Grouping the tasks removes the possibility to define a primary
ordering. We want to be able to ungroup the tasks in some cases.
The implentation was done in the portalsearch bar adding
a group by option. The portal proposes two grouping options,
project (by default) and none (to keep strict ordering).
Task: #1827950
PR #23769
Have a task (A) with two subtasks (B and C)
Archive C
Before this commit, when using timesheets, the task A hours was misconputed and did not take C's timesheet into account
After this commit, hours are accounted for even if their task is archived
OPW 1829658
closes#23920
As of v11, project tasks and project issues have been merged.
Issues used to be ordered by:
priority desc, create_date desc
whereas Tasks had the following historical ordering:
priority desc, sequence, date_start, name, id
(where `date_start` corresponds to the creation date of the task, or the
time where task work began)
After the merge, the Task order was kept, but it became difficult to
understand for users, especially for converted issues.
This commit modifies the default order to a more obvious common order:
priority desc, sequence, id desc
With the following goals in mind:
- the ordering does not change without obvious actions of the user
(starring a record moves it at the top, manually reordering records
reorders them within the same "stars category), and creating new
records adds them at the top, where they are visible
- the ordering is easy to grasp, based on stars and chronological
order, while still allowing manual reordering when really necessary
(by default all records will have the default sequence of 10)
- sorting by "id desc" is similar to the previous "create_date desc"
but it can be sorted more efficiently by the database
One could argue about sorting on chronological or reverse chronological
order. Like blogs and timelines, everyone has their preferences.
The latter option was selected because our UI for quickly adding records
is at the top of the kanban view, so it is more natural to see new
records at the top, instead of having them disappear at the bottom
immediately.
Hopefully this will not disrupt user workflows too much, and will remain
intuitive enough.
This commit adds 3 indexes targeting project_task which are not only
useful in regular RW use cases, but help tremendously when deleting
tasks.
In a production scenario, deleting a single task record went from 685ms
to 5ms.
Equivalent queries for an existing database:
CREATE INDEX account_analytic_line_task_id_index ON account_analytic_line(task_id);
CREATE INDEX project_task_parent_id_index ON project_task(parent_id);
CREATE INDEX sale_order_line_task_id_index ON sale_order_line(task_id);
This filter groups tasks based on a message_last_post field that is not
updated anymore since quite a long time. It has been implemented for some
internal custom use and not supported since.
As this field has no use and lead to wrong result it has to be removed. Its
purpose can still be achieved in custom using server actions activating the
message_last_post context key and adding the field in custom views.
Done after feedback from internal migration.
Customer portal has a widget to display a chatter-like communication
history. However only user comments are displayed. It seems interesting
for documents like tasks that also include tickets and support to
display incoming emails. Indeed most customers will use their email
to discuss with the responsible.
Done after feedback from internal migration.
As tasks are now used for a lot of use cases including tickets and support
it seems fair to include the task ID as reference in the portal view
for customers. It eases the communication process as people can directly
give the reference (aka ID).
This commit therefore adds a column in portal list view with the task ID
as reference. It also adds it in the portal form view, just after the
task name.
Done after feedback from internal migration.
When something like this is in a html content:
```
<a href="hello">
<div>
<b>this</b>
<a href="world">!</a>
</div>
</a>
```
browsers may correct it to:
```
<a href="hello"> </a>
<div>
<a href="hello">
<b>this</b>
</a>
<a href="world">!</a>
</div>
</a>
```
which breaks our CSS.
This change transforms the inner tag in a button tag.
opw-1817668
closes#23373
Odoo Translation Bot