Tests from hr_recruitments work luckily until now.
Because module maintenance imply base.group_user for group_equipment_manager
<record id="group_equipment_manager" model="res.groups">
...
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('base.group_user'))]"/>
</record>
and module hr_maintenante imply group_equipment_manager for hr_user
<record id="hr.group_hr_user" model="res.groups">
<field name="implied_ids" eval="[(4, ref('maintenance.group_equipment_manager'))]"/>
</record>
After this commit launch test on hr_recruitment module without any other module will works.
Design-theme repo show this error because repo tests hr_recruitment without installing maintenance
(Repo install website_* modules -> website_hr_recruitment -> hr_recruitment -> hr)
Backport-of d5b0f99943 to have runbot design-theme green
In recruitment, clicking on configuration > job positions > kanban view
leads to an odoo client error.
The qweb template cannot evaluate the condition on the client side.
With this commit, the ternary condition is properly evaluated.
Also, an unnecessary t-attf is removed.
Closes#26486
Regenerate all child translations based on the .pot
Remove the terms that are either equal to the parent, either equal to the
source term.
Remove empty translation files
Courtesy of Juan José Scarafía, ADHOC
The quality of the Spanish (Argentina) translations is very poor.
Remove them all and will start from scratch, translating only when needed.
Refactor resource calendar and resource mixin:
- add a required timezone field on models 'resource.calendar' and 'resource.resource';
- resource calendar attendances are now computed in the timezone of the resource
or the calendar;
- improve API of 'resource.calendar' and 'resource.mixin';
- avoid other modules from using the implementation methods of 'resource.calendar';
- refactor implementation of 'resource.calendar' to make it more efficient.
a696f84f1f adds a few extra fields to the
Private information tab of the employee form. As a result, HR personnel
and employees could reasonably expect these fields to be protected in
the same manner as the other private fields. Make it so.
Cherry-Pick of odoo/enterprise@533db05b5eFixes#18610
Purpose
=======
Add the possibility to create private addresses, only accessible for a subset
of users.
Specification
=============
- Add a new 'Private' partner type
- Add a res.groups in base 'Access to Private Addresses'
- Add ir.rules for the following behavior:
- Every employees/internal users can read non-private addresses
- Only users in group_private_addresses can access private addresses
- Add in base a simplified form view for private addresses
- A HR Officer is automatically granted in group_private_addresses
- Use the simplified form view to open the address_home_id form on employees
Add some private information on the employees like:
- Certificate: Bachelor, Master, Other
- Place/Date of birth
- KM Home/Work
- Emergency Number/Contact
- ...
Also move some already existing private information from hr_contract to hr.
The reified view on the res users will be dropped in the following commit.
The previous commit adds support to define each group as a computed field on the res users.
This commit defines:
- A boolean field for each 'isolated' res.group, i.e. a group in the hidden category.
- A selection field for each 'Application' res.group, i.e. a group in a application category.
Example:
- The group to manage pricelist in sales becomes a boolean field
- The groups project user/manager become a selection field