The following models are already using big images, or they might need big images
in the future:
- partner
- hr employee
- shop category
- lunch product
- gamification badge and karma rank
PR: #34925
Message post should always be called on a record (ensure_one). That way we
ensure posting a message is always done in a record's context with right
values computed (reply_to, followers, ...)
Message_notify can be called on record or on mail_thread and must have
partner_ids. It is based on the recently modified user_notification mechanism
and allow to notify a partner on a record or just to push him a message
(aka, not linked to a record).
Small performance improvement
* browse recipients instead of search in _notify_email_recipients;
* todo in future optimizations: mayybe be improve by searching on ids
and is_blacklist immediately;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
Purpose of this commit is to clean some bits of code, notably calls to
message_post/log as well as notification methods. It will ease performance
improvement work.
Small optimization: account: read content after extension check
Parameter cleaning
* use message log with kwargs instead of args;
* remove message post after hook useless parameters;
* remove _notify_email_recipients useless message parameter;
* remove message_notify useless send_after_commit parameters;
* remove message post params matching default values;
Other improvements
* remove message_post commands support for partners and channels;
* only calls message_post with ids list for channels and partners. We
don't support mix of ids and command anymore to simplify code;
* remove support of private discussion in mail.thread adding partners
as recipients, as there is no use anymore;
Related to task 1943901
Linked to PR #32404
If user has blocked odoo push notifications
then there's no way to enable via the OdooBot notification in the systray as it depends on the navigator
so display the alert message under users preference section.
Related Task ID: 1929547
closesodoo/odoo#30496
General Purpose
===============
We want an 'Employee profile' gathering every data about an employee.
The main form view is modified to become this employee profile.
A user can also see his own profile through the Preferences menu.
The new profile replaces the current Preferences view if the hr module is installed
and the current user is linked to an employee.
A user should be able to see and edit his own profile.
*Problem*:
Many fields on hr.employee are protected by groups="hr.group_hr_user".
Therefore, a regular user cannot see or edit those fields.
This protection must be bypassed to allow read/write access
to the regular user's own data.
A similar mechanism already exists for res.users (for Preferences)
The better (least worst) solution found is to reuse this mechanism by adding related fields on res.users.
Pros:
- Don't change security access on hr.employee
- Don't implement yet another custom security layer, risking to add new security breaches
- A lot of fields are added by other modules on hr.employee.
It would have required to integrate them with the custom security layer.
- Fields added by other modules on the user's preferences view (normal view, not the profile)
are automatically included in the employee's profile view.
- Allow the hr.employee form view to be different than the user profile accessible
through the Preferences menu.
E.g. add custom buttons only relevant to the logged in user such as "Request a leave".
Cons:
- Each field from hr.employee that you want to appear on its profile
must be added as a related field on res.users
- Those related fields must be added to user's preferences view (duplicate views)
- They also must be added to SELF_[READABLE | WRITABLE]_FIELDS
Note:
When the front-end loads the views it gets the list of available fields
for the user (according to its access rights). Later, when the front-end wants to
populate the view with data, it only asks to read those available fields.
However, in this case, we want the user to be able to read/write its own data,
even if they are protected by groups (groups are kept on the related fields on res.users).
The front-end need to be made aware of those fields by sending all field definitions.
hr_attendance
=============
This commit integrate attendance in the new employee profile.
It also adds a stat button to this employee profile showing
the number of hours worked last month.
Remove the boolean computed field 'manual_attendance'.
This field is just a shortcut to add/remove the employee's user
in the "Manual Attendance" group.
The checkbox is confusing on the employee's form and this should
be done through the normal group management screens.
hr_presence
===========
Display the presence status on the employee kanban template.
The status is a colored chip which can be green (present),
orange (to define) or red (absent).
Currently, the presence status is only computed when accessing
the report view. As this commits displays it on the employee kanban,
it should be updated more frequently.
The state should not be updated every time the kanban view is loaded
since the computation is a bit heavy. Instead: add a cron to update
status every 15 minutes.
-> The status is accurate on the report view (status is still updated
when loading the view)
-> The status in accurate at 15 minutes on the kanban view
[ADD] hr_attendance_presence
============================
Bridge module between hr_attendance and hr_presence.
This commit integrates hr_presence module in the employee
profile and adds the presence status on the employee kanban view.
But hr_attendance adds at the same place a similar status icon for
checkin/checkout.
This bridge module makes the status from hr_presence invisible as
hr_attendance should be the main presence control mechanism.
Also, this commit adds the ability (through a new setting option)
for hr_presence to take into account checkin/checkout to determine
the presence status.
l10n_be_hr_payroll
==================
integration with employee profile
This commit is a refactoring of im_status management.
This commit also add im_status in two places, near the author in a mail thread and on each suggestion when using mentions.
A service to manage im_status will have multiple benefits here:
-centralise information, avoid to call the server multiple time for the same im_status
-update all im_status at once and keep consistency in display.
With this commit, the im_status updates are now done by rpc call.
Updates where previously made with the bus but this has some drawback,
since the bus will only give the information 50 seconds after the beginning of
the request, in the worst case, we van wait 2*50 seconds to get an update.
More than that, the im_status where only updates for pinned dm_chat. Dm chat
are synchronized cross tabs, making the use of the bus possible for this purpose.
Since we will need to display im_status not linked to dm_chat, the list to update
will be different from tab to tab making the use of bus difficult for this purpose.
Technical notes:
-im_search has been moved from bus to mail addons since it concerns mail.channel
-Update of an im_status should be reflected everywhere in the page.
Since im_status is a rendered template used in multiple widget, we should add
the correct logic to all concerened widget. The current solution is simple:
use a jquery selector to find every place where im_status is rendered.
-we add a new im_status: im_partner. This will indicate that that
the partner has no user linked to him, making it possible to avoid to ask
for status updates for this partner.
-The update will only be done when the tab is focused. (and will be done
asap once the tab get focus back)
mail.channel module in mail module has the description "Discussion Channel"
(with a capital C) and was overriden in im_livechat to "Discussion channel"
(with a lowercase c).
Installing a module was renaming a field (which is never a good idea, especially
for translated fields)
closesodoo/odoo#32238
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the notification "Odoobot has a request" would
stay on screen even though the user blocked them in Firefox.
This case occurred when the user clicks on "Not Now", which tells the
browser that the push notifications should be blocked until the next
page reload.
This commit fixes this issue, so that the notification is removed
when clicking on "Not Now", in addition to cleaning tests related
to push notifications.
Task-ID 1918476
closesodoo/odoo#29584
With this commit, no push notification is sent to user when
to acknowledge that he just has accepted them. Also, on native
push notifications, the Odoo Bot icon now has a transparent
background.
Task-ID 1881001
Sébastien Theys