When we edit a list view and change page before the change has been
savec, the saving and page changing will be done concurrently thus
possibly causing an error if the page is changed before the saved is
finished: the save will try to modify the page that is no more
displayed.
In this change, the list view editable wait for the saving to be
finished before reloading its content.
note: for 9.0 up to saas-15
opw-1839149
closes#24471
Before this commit, when uploading a file as attachment in Safari,
The file icon kept on showing 'downloading' whereas the request was successful
This was because the return from the server had a different UTF-8 norm than Safari
After this commit, it works well
OPW 1836545
closes#24307
Before this commit, whenever we do an operation on any of these custom views,
such as folding it, the custom view was saved by creating a new one.
This behaviour comes from a lost feature to undo operations on custom views.
Since we do not have this feature anymore, it makes no sense to create new
custom views on save, instead of applying the changes in place.
With this commit, custom views are edited in place.
Fixes#23712
This commit improves link creation in web editor.
Before this commit, anything with a @ would be considered as valid email which
is obviously not the case. It would then be prefixed by 'mailto:'.
This was causing 2 issues:
- URL with @ symbol in it would have 'mailto:' added as prefix, like google
maps coordinates.
eg: mailto:http://www.google.com/maps/whatever/@312211.22,321321
- Incorrect emails would go through (eg: @@@, ko@k@k@, mail@mail)
Now, we will try to detect and identify valid emails from invalid emails from
URLs. It will also handle 'mailto:' directly typed in the input.
This commit comes with it's counterpart in enterprise https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/1859
This closes#11984, closes#22936
Note that there is a WIP in master to use this new is_email function
everywhere we try to validate emails. It will aim to uniformize email
validation in odoo's javascript that are often performed with different mean
here and there, some more permissive than others, some only checking for @.
- In some languages the kanban images are not displayed because of a bug in human_size method in JS.
This method translates the Unit Size for data and strip with the string with a comma as separator.
When the translatation contains spaces after the commas (like in the French translation), there is extra spaces in the final result.
This then cause an issue with the method is_bin_size that expects a unique space between the value and its unit.
Resulting in a bug in the method 'kanban_image'.
opw #804973#804970#804648
When there are too many labels to display on the x-axis, they overlap
and it simply becomes unreadable. By slightly rotating them, this can be
avoided in most cases.
Back-port of this commit 388e258ce8
opw:802925
On a tree view:
- Add a button returning an `act_url` action; e.g.:
```
@api.multi
def open_google(self):
return {
'type': 'ir.actions.act_url',
'url': 'https://google.fr/',
'target': 'new',
}
```
- Click on a button
The action call works only once because the button is never re-enabled.
The button is actually enabled only at view rendering. Therefore, we
call `on_close` in order to reload the view.
opw-784587
Mixing positive and negative values in a pie chart is not possible.
However, in this case, a crash occurs instead of displaying an error
message.
opw-786137
When grouping a graph view by a selection field, the labels on x axis
were the selection values themselves (not their corresponding label).
This issue was only present if there was only one group by field. In
this case, the attribute `grouped_on` is not an array but a string
containing the field name. This case wasn't correctly handled.
Note that this issue is not present in the new views (from saas-16).
Closes#19790
When logging multiple elements in one log call in the new Firefox
version, all the elements are kept on one line. So if the second
element starts with a line feed, it will not go under the first
element but still be at the right of the first element, on a new
line.
... gives wrong values due to the timezone.
For instance, let's assume that the browser timezone of the user
is UTC+2, and the user types 10/09/2017 10:00:00 in a searchview
with a datetime field in its arch (i.e. which autocompletes on a
datatime field). Before this rev., the suggested value was
10/09/2017 08:00:00, i.e. the timezone offset was substracted from
the value.
On chrome only, the translate icon was over the <input/> element but
below the <input/> text... this commit fixes this by forcing
relative positioning on the icon so that it is always rendered after
the <input/> (which seems to solve the chrome bug).
Before this commit, when the amount of rows was above xls format threshold (>65535), the xlwt library threw an obscure Traceback to the user.
We now test the amount of rows before even calling the library, raising a more helpful message to the user
OPW 767319
closes#19035
On a list view, if we group records the arrows and changing page
feature are disabled. But if then we removed the grouping, the arrows
never reappeared.
note: not necessary as of 9.0 it was already solved in 1280bf251
opw-760956
closes#18596
With the new client web from v9, we start the new action before to destroy the old one.
When we switch from Apps (store) to Update and vice-versa, iframe was not loaded correctly.
In case of the Apps widget, we are binding event of the new iframe during the start,
and when it is ready, we destroy the old ifram and so unbind the listener of 'message.apps'.
Using a uniq id, we ensure to bind new event, and only unbind old event during the destroy.
It shouldn't be possible to duplicate ir.model.fields. Add attribute
´duplicate´ which can be set to false to hide the duplication option in the
action menu.
This simple return allows submodules to be able to know when a dialog is shown and modify something in it.
Note from GED: I am aware that this is a IMP in a stable version, and I really don't like that... But it looks like it really helps many people, as shown by the PR, and the risk induced by this commit is definitely extremely low, so I will make an exception.
(PR: #15579)