Using api.constrains should be used instead
Simply leave a warning in case a model uses a non-empty attribute
`_constraints`.
closesodoo/odoo#34679
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
The previous commit introduced some changes for SCA/PSD2 but some things
were missing; most notably, registering payment cards in a s2s flow used
the old Charge API that is not SCA-ready.
This commit uses the SetupIntent API instead, allowing to register the
card prior to payment. The global flow is described in the Stripe
documentation in more details: https://stripe.com/docs/payments/cards/saving-cards
Unfortunately, given the complete flow of payments, it is not possible
to use the PaymentIntents API since this would require having the
reference of the transaction before it gets created (the TX is created
after the form submission, but the token must already exist at that
point). Since this is meant to be backported, this changes are kept
minimal in this feature branch. The PaymentIntents API would have been
better since registering a card during a payment makes it more likely
that future off-session transactions will not require an authentication
step. We'll have to live with that for now; it's difficult to know
exactly how this will affect customers before PSD2 goes into effect on
september 14.
Another branch might completely change the flow soon-ish to a more
asynchroneous model, although it may miss the v13 freeze date -_-
- treat s2s transactions as such
- don't filter out tokens saved on acquirers that are not set for full
s2s mode, as tokens might get created through a form and still be usable
- detect the submit event as well as the click on the 'Pay Now' button
to avoid completely wrecking the payment flow by pressing the return key
- correct start override in JS should chain promises
Accept payment on Paypal without having a merchant account
The merchant only need an email address to accept payment from Paypal
Paypal will send email to the merchant to create an account with the details
Odoo will send mail to the merchant to fill all the credentials after creating an account
Note: why used rm? - If IPN is disabled in the profile (case for the new user), the default action to call the return_url is a GET. This means that if your return_url is a script, you must set rm = 2 in order to have the IPN variable POSTed to that URL
task- 34668
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
Purpose
=======
While cleaning the stat buttons across all modules, we
decided to move the (un)archiving from stat button to
actions in the 'Action' dropdown.
Specification
=============
Remove the 'active' stat buttons in all views
Same reason as: 4ba4d61903
Some messages from payment are displayed on the frontend (eg. when the
transaction is being done on the ecommerce), but only translations of
module matching a given domain (computed with the method of ir.http
model: _get_translation_frontend_modules_domain) are made available on
the frontend.
With this changeset, payment is added in the domain (which can be done
since payment depends on account, account on portal, and portal in
http_routing that declares the method).
opw-2033528
closes#34712
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
In case the partner has no language (not a required field), the fallback on the
payment transaction was 'en_US'
en_US may however be an invalid choice for partner_lang field as it is
a selection field that only has the activated languages (result of the call to
self.env['res.lang'].get_installed())
A database created in a different language does not have en_US activated
Fallback on user language instead of False as the partner_lang is expected by
some payment providers and may produce an error is empty
Fixesodoo/odoo#33750closesodoo/odoo#33870
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
* payment, im_livechat
Inline scripts using `odoo.define` cannot work anymore as the boot.js
file loading will be deferred.
Most of features which used an inline script should probably be entirely
refactored. This commit focuses on removing the inline scripts
with a minimal diff (or at least tried to).
Note: for the website livechat, the inline script was kept as it seems
to be a longer refactoring to get rid of it (even though it is clearly
possible). The inline script was however adapted to make sure it works
with lazy loaded JS in the frontend.
Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/32181
task-1961045
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Adrian Torres