On firefox if we do for example:
ALT+GR + [ALT+GRable ´ key]
Firefox may send keys "AltGr" and "Dead" instead of just "AltGr".
This was possibly causing caret to go a position too low when writing
speedily with diacritical marks.
opw-1903865
closes#28739
If resetting a background color was the only edition that was done on a
page and that this page was saved, the change was not properly saved
as the page was not marked as dirty.
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/27625
task-1879524
On Safari, when editing the template of a mail.mass_mailing,
clicking the "Read more" button (or any button that can
have a link to the website) didn't open pop up to set
the URL of the website.
PS: inspired from https://github.com/textAngular/textAngular/issues/762
opw:1889643
If we do:
- one change that will be saved in history
- go back to the document before any change
- do other change
we can easily get in a state were the history is no longer recorded.
The history is kept like this:
- pos: our position in the history
- aUndo: the snapshots of history
- toSnap: the last history snapshop that is to be saved
so for example if we start without change (at originalState):
{pos: 0, aUndo=[], toSnap=null}
Then we do two changes (change1, change2):
{pos: 2, aUndo=[originalState, change1], toSnap=change2}
If we make an undo, we will get to:
{pos: 1, aUndo=[originalState,change1,change2], toSnap=null)
If we make another change (change3):
{pos: 2, aUndo=[originalState, change1], toSnap=change3}
So the history after the position is removed.
But when we get back to the original, the state would forever be:
{pos: 0, aUndo=[originalState], toSnap=change85}
because when doing a change, the code only removed history from the
max(pos, 1) index.
opw-1870119
closes#26701
In the editor in a table cell, when we press UP/DOWN keys:
- we have default editor/browser behavior if there is content before
(UP) or after (DOWN) the element we are currently on
- else we go to the previous (UP) or next (DOWN) row if available
- else we go to the next content if available
- else we have the default editor/browser behavior
But when checking if there is an element before/after the content, we
did not take into account if there was an ancestor node inside the cell
that had content after, so for example with this structure:
```
<table>
<tr><td>
<p>hello <b>world</b></p>
<p>cruel</p>
</td></tr>
<tr><td>
<p>bingo</p>
</td></tr>
</table>
```
if the current range was on 'world' text node, we would just check if
there is content after this text node, not if there is content after its
`<p/>` ancestor.
Before the fix we would get on the next row, after we would have default
editor/browser behavior: ie. if cruel is on another line, going to this
line.
opw-1870119
closes#26701
If we applied a link eg. on:
```
<span>hello <b>world</b></span>
```
The system actually gets the "label": hello worldworld because there is
3 nodes:
text node: hello
element node: `<b>world</b>`
text node: world
Also since "hello worldworld" is different than "hello world",
instead of just keeping existing nodes and adding the link, the system
would replace the selected range by:
`<span><a>hello worldworld</a></span>'
instead of:
`<span><a>hello </a><b><a>world</a></b></span>`
This commit ignores element nodes when creating a new link, since when
getting the label of the link from the selection, only the text nodes
insides the element nodes have any interest.
There was a second issue because if we had:
```
<i><a href="hello">world</a></i>!
```
and tried to put a link over "world!", the code would decide: "world" is
inside a link so we will just update that link.
Thus we would get:
```
<i><a href="hello">world!</a></i>!
```
instead of:
```
<i><a href="hello">world</a></i><a href="hello">!</a>
```
opw-1848351
closes#25187
When a t-field element was in an editable t-ignore environement,
modifying it was leaving the edit mode style attached to it. This
was because of:
1) When the t-field element was changed, it was marked dirty but
also its parent editable container. Fixing this, only solves
the case where only the t-field (and not one of its neighbors)
is changed but it was worth fixing anyway.
2) Before saving an element, the potential 'o_editable' and
summernote classes were not removed of its descendant and were
thus saved.
Bug found with task-38069, merged in stable as it might occur there
too.
In firefox, if we have a range on eg.:
`<input type="file">`
and we tabulate to get to it, we have the range over:
`<button type="button" tabindex="0">Browse…</button>`
which seems to be a "virtual" element inside the `<input/>` but this
magic element is "Restricted" and causes error such as:
`Permission denied to access property "nodeName"`
So this fix ignore errors when getting a range from current selection on
keyup.
opw-1819279
closes#24524
The browser may throw an error when a big mail such as one with
hundreds thousands of tags is being transformed to have a style
more compatible with mail clients.
The error would be:
"Uncaught RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded"
This happens in jquery because we hare too many nodes (there is an
ongoing issue at https://github.com./jquery/sizzle/issues/403) so this
commit replace that part by a DFS traversal over DOM nodes.
There was also an issue that not having the option "style-inline" would
still cause some style code to be ran albeit it was intended not to be
solved in 55c7d2d5b0.
opw-1841107
closes#24550
The copy-paste feature of summernote was messy and led most of the time
to breaking the template you were trying to edit. While it is difficult
to solve as it mostly comes from the lib itself and that the lib is in
a complicated state as Odoo had to overridde part of its internal code
for its own purposes, this commit hopes to solve the problem by updating
only the copy-paste feature to the latest summernote version.
Of course, as summernote changed a lot meanwhile, it was not possible to
just take the up-to-date summernote file. This commit refactores the
up-to-date summernote clipboard code so that it fits the old summernote
version Odoo is using.
Note: the main problems occurred while using Windows/Mac and not Linux.
opw-1837818
In firefox the range when doing CTRL+A is the first level content of the
contenteditable element, but this was not taken into account when
"remembering" the range after clicking on buttons or features of the
editor.
In chrome the selection begin with the first displayed element (so it
may not be a direct child of the editable and is taken into account in
the code).
opw-1824017
closes#24424