- Create a RFQ
- Send it to the customer
The email sent contains a 'View Purchase Order' button instead of 'View
Request for Quotation'.
We make use of the previous commit to correct the issue.
opw-1915230
Following BS4 migration and adding sections and notes.
=====
Document templates:
- Remove margin from <p> in "informations" to allow them to be
correctly centered vertically on their container.
- Also add a mt- and mb- on their <div> to better handle them going to a new
line when there are too many of them.
- Add class for section and note to be able to customize them in layouts.
- Add class for price_total to be able to customize it in layouts instead
of relying on :last-child.
- Add "page-break-inside: avoid;" on the "total" table to not split it
between pages when it can be avoided.
- Fix sale report template "Informations" to use col-auto just like invoice
See 6b8d7bb6d6
=====
Boxed layout:
- fix section & note style
- fix borders in general
- fix the total table
Background layout:
- fix section style
- fix the total table
Clean layout:
- fix page number vertical align
task-1889346
closesodoo/odoo#27782
Before that, when receiving, then invoicing with price diff, the value in interim account corresponded to the price on the invoice instead of the original valuation one.
Scenario to reproduce the issue:
* create PO with 1 product, FIFO valuation, price=10
* receive PO: the entry in stock interim account has debit=credit=10
* create invoice, with price=15 instead of 10
* the invoice entry should be: payable: C=15 ; price diff: D=5 ; interim account: D=10
==> Instead, we had payable: C=20 ; price diff: D=5 ; interim account: D=15 => this was wrong
Also added a test case for the same scenario, verifying the amounts written in the different accounts (and refactored a bit ValuationReconciliationTestCase for easiness)
Closes#27394
Fixing it directly by commit since there is no es_AR on transifex.
The issue of the ticket has been solved by transifex, this is for
another similar issue that has been found.
opw-1907924
closes#28929
When a user accesses a PO through the portal thanks to an access token
(without being connected), the product image on each order line is
rendered using the image placeholder with a size of 48x48.
This raises a 403 Forbidden at image retrieval since the access token is
not passed as a parameter. This commit corrects that behavior by sending
the resized image along with the rendering of the template instead of an
url.
Another solution could be to generalize the access token check to any
model in:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/12.0/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_http.py#L303-L311
But this seems overkill regarding this specific error.
opw-1902741
closesodoo/odoo#28479
Purpose is to extend the use of the newly-introduced activity view allowing
to see at a glance activities to perform on a given model. It eases daily
job of people working with activities.
Updated
* purchase and RFQ main actions;
* specific product actions defined for some menu actions in purchase;
This commit is linked to task ID 1889413.
This commit adapts the business code to changes introduced by
the parent commit in order to keep the same behaviour as before.
All readonly=False fields will have to be checked afterwards to confirm
that the business case requires write access to the source field.
Martin Trigaux