This attribute is misleading as it is insufficient to correctly upgrade
the database. It only renames the column in the database, but other
operations are needed, like updating the corresponding `ir.model.fields`
record (and its xmlid). The default values and the translations are also
lost during the upgrade.
Moreover, this feature was misused. It was:
- left on fields during multiple versions.
- used on reports (SQL views). This would be ok if the feature was
complete, but, as is, it was useless.
- kept unchanged after a second renaming of the field (which can happen
versions later the first rename).
- used, even when the meaning of the field changed. i.e. the field
`archived` has been renamed to the classic `active`, but the value
in the database should be switched.
PURPOSE
This commit removes the mass_mailing.campaign model. Instead of having a fully
fledged model, we will simply inherit utm.campaign. We will also add relevant
statistics on utm campaign model in order to use it in various applications.
SPECIFICATIONS
This commit removes the mass_mailing.campaign model. Instead of having a fully
fledged model, we will simply inherit utm.campaign. This change implies that
mass_mailing.tag and mass_mailing.stage have to move to the utm model along
their associated views/data.
These changes were made so that campaigns could be used in the future
by social, mass_mailing and mass_sms and available in the same view
This commit also removes the source_id and the medium_id
fields on the campaign.
This commit also moves the unique_ab_testing field from the mass_mailing_campaign
to the mass_mailing model
Task ID: 2002029
PR: #34015
Purpose
=======
Some formviews are useless since there are so few relevant fields https://nimb.ws/1EdMV7
For instance, to create a new lost reason the user is forced to:
1. Hit create
2. Type in the name of the record
3. Hit save
4. Go back to the treeview
While he could simply type them away in an editable treeview.
The goal of this task is to allow for creation/edition of records in such models
directly from the treeview.
Specification
=============
Modify tree views from a given list of models for which the
treeview has to be made editable bottom.
If not specified otherwise, the content treeview should stay the same.
If a field is readonly/required/etc. in the formview, it should be in the
editable treeview as well.
Relabeling has to be done of the field itself, not in the view.
TaskID: 2026126
closesodoo/odoo#34577
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closesodoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Purpose of this task is to allow marketing people to differentiate the
mailing name (internal reference) from the subject used in the mailing
emails.
Mailing name is actually the UTM source name as mass mailing inherits
from it. Being able to edit it independently from the subject allows
to better categorize / filter mailings without sending technical terms
to customers. Marketing users could also change and tweak mailing subject
without disorganizing the pipe and changing the URM source name.
Demo data are updated accordingly to have both subject and mailing
names.
This commit is linked to task ID 1917602 and PR #29514.
lbs-odoo