On firefox if we do for example:
ALT+GR + [ALT+GRable ´ key]
Firefox may send keys "AltGr" and "Dead" instead of just "AltGr".
This was possibly causing caret to go a position too low when writing
speedily with diacritical marks.
opw-1903865
closes#28739
If resetting a background color was the only edition that was done on a
page and that this page was saved, the change was not properly saved
as the page was not marked as dirty.
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/27625
task-1879524
On Safari, when editing the template of a mail.mass_mailing,
clicking the "Read more" button (or any button that can
have a link to the website) didn't open pop up to set
the URL of the website.
PS: inspired from https://github.com/textAngular/textAngular/issues/762
opw:1889643
If we do:
- one change that will be saved in history
- go back to the document before any change
- do other change
we can easily get in a state were the history is no longer recorded.
The history is kept like this:
- pos: our position in the history
- aUndo: the snapshots of history
- toSnap: the last history snapshop that is to be saved
so for example if we start without change (at originalState):
{pos: 0, aUndo=[], toSnap=null}
Then we do two changes (change1, change2):
{pos: 2, aUndo=[originalState, change1], toSnap=change2}
If we make an undo, we will get to:
{pos: 1, aUndo=[originalState,change1,change2], toSnap=null)
If we make another change (change3):
{pos: 2, aUndo=[originalState, change1], toSnap=change3}
So the history after the position is removed.
But when we get back to the original, the state would forever be:
{pos: 0, aUndo=[originalState], toSnap=change85}
because when doing a change, the code only removed history from the
max(pos, 1) index.
opw-1870119
closes#26701
In the editor in a table cell, when we press UP/DOWN keys:
- we have default editor/browser behavior if there is content before
(UP) or after (DOWN) the element we are currently on
- else we go to the previous (UP) or next (DOWN) row if available
- else we go to the next content if available
- else we have the default editor/browser behavior
But when checking if there is an element before/after the content, we
did not take into account if there was an ancestor node inside the cell
that had content after, so for example with this structure:
```
<table>
<tr><td>
<p>hello <b>world</b></p>
<p>cruel</p>
</td></tr>
<tr><td>
<p>bingo</p>
</td></tr>
</table>
```
if the current range was on 'world' text node, we would just check if
there is content after this text node, not if there is content after its
`<p/>` ancestor.
Before the fix we would get on the next row, after we would have default
editor/browser behavior: ie. if cruel is on another line, going to this
line.
opw-1870119
closes#26701
Before this commit, if the user opened the LESS editor and emptied a
file, he may get a compilation error (as intended if the file contained
necessary variables and stuff) but this error also prevented to open
the editor again because some code tried to decode an empty content.
Now, when a file is emptied it is set to an unique line feed.
If we applied a link eg. on:
```
<span>hello <b>world</b></span>
```
The system actually gets the "label": hello worldworld because there is
3 nodes:
text node: hello
element node: `<b>world</b>`
text node: world
Also since "hello worldworld" is different than "hello world",
instead of just keeping existing nodes and adding the link, the system
would replace the selected range by:
`<span><a>hello worldworld</a></span>'
instead of:
`<span><a>hello </a><b><a>world</a></b></span>`
This commit ignores element nodes when creating a new link, since when
getting the label of the link from the selection, only the text nodes
insides the element nodes have any interest.
There was a second issue because if we had:
```
<i><a href="hello">world</a></i>!
```
and tried to put a link over "world!", the code would decide: "world" is
inside a link so we will just update that link.
Thus we would get:
```
<i><a href="hello">world!</a></i>!
```
instead of:
```
<i><a href="hello">world</a></i><a href="hello">!</a>
```
opw-1848351
closes#25187
When a t-field element was in an editable t-ignore environement,
modifying it was leaving the edit mode style attached to it. This
was because of:
1) When the t-field element was changed, it was marked dirty but
also its parent editable container. Fixing this, only solves
the case where only the t-field (and not one of its neighbors)
is changed but it was worth fixing anyway.
2) Before saving an element, the potential 'o_editable' and
summernote classes were not removed of its descendant and were
thus saved.
Bug found with task-38069, merged in stable as it might occur there
too.
Christophe Simonis