Before the fix we were requiring for product.supplierinfo.requisition_id
which is a non existing field of the model 'product.supplierinfo'. I
just change it then to purchase_requisition_id which is the required
field.
This triggered an error when you add a product selled by the defined
vendor for an aggreement type defined as 'Blanket order'.
opw-1914712
closesodoo/odoo#29342
Usecase to reproduce:
- Enable 'Managers must approve orders'
- Set agreement type as 'exclusive'
- Connect as purchase user
- Create a requisition and an RFQ linked to it
- Confirm the RFQ
It raises a usererror that ask to close other PO linked
to requisition.
It happens because the purchase requisition code do not take
care of double validation on PO. It will try to close the requisition
once button_confirm is called. However it will only write 'to approve'
on PO state and thus trigger the requistion error will be raise since
all linked PO are not 'done' or 'cancel'.
In order to fix it, the action_done on requisition should be call
on button_approve instead of button_confirm. (button_approve is
automatically called when double validation is not enable).
Task: #1884410Closes#28068closesodoo/odoo#29049
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a product : stockable + purchase : propose a call for tenders + reordering rule (qty min 0, max 0, multiple 1)
- Create a SO for that product.
- Run the scheduler once : a requistion is generated (Purchases > Purchase > Purchase Agreements), which is normal behavior
- Run the scheduler a second time
Bug:
A new requistion was generated for the same product, by the same reordering rule
opw:1892950
closesodoo/odoo#28611
payment_term.id, creates a tuple wich works if payment_term.id is set
in case payment_term.id is False this creates the tuple (False,) which
is then converted by the Odoo ORM to a account.payment.term(False, )
record set, which in term may cause weird behaviour as this value does
not eval to false in cases like `if self.payment_term_id:`
Closesodoo/odoo#28397
When creating a "purchase.requisition" record, the default Operation Type was
always the one defined in the company 1 even if the user was not in the company 1.
opw:1890190
closesodoo/odoo#27830
When creating a "purchase.requisition" record, the default Operation Type was
always the one defined in the company 1 even if the user was not in the company 1.
opw:1890190
closesodoo/odoo#27520
This commit adapts the business code to changes introduced by
the parent commit in order to keep the same behaviour as before.
All readonly=False fields will have to be checked afterwards to confirm
that the business case requires write access to the source field.
Odoo Translation Bot