Display a BoM.
On BoM lines, there is an attachment feature that creates a mrp.document,
which is basically a container for an attachment.
This commit fixes the view which displayed 'no attachment' when there were some
and vice versa.
It also fixes the computation of the number of attachment: the displayed view is
on mrp.document, but the computation is done on ir.attachment.
As a result if there are other unrelated attachments (such as digital files)
they would be counted but not displayed.
opw 1923441
closesodoo/odoo#30208
On a manufacturing order, there is no way to print a pdf report that
gather all finished products. This new report show product, quantity as
well as the lot barcode and name.
Task : 1923216
closesodoo/odoo#30011
Usecase to reproduce:
- Connect with demo user
- Create a MO w/h routing
- Confirm and produce it
- Record the production wizard
Access right error on product.product for field tracking
It happens because the wizard use a related to product.tracking howerver
it is not set as readonly on the view and send to the server as a value
on save. Since it write on a related field it will try to write on the
linked model(product.product).
This commit set the field as readonly so it is not set to the server.
The field is just used inside domain and it is invisible to the user
so it do not modify any behavior.
opw-1918684
closesodoo/odoo#29942
This commit has several parts:
- fix ordering of attributes and values
- fix/create python logic (notably for checking the possibility of a combination
and for price computing)
- fix currency
- display correct info on the views without the need of JS (prevent flickering)
- fix various issues with website and SO
- add a lot of tests (both unit and tour)
================================================================================
*** Make consistent the filtering and ordering of product variants ***
Filter & Check possibility
==========================
The first variant shown on the website should always be possible.
When activating the customize "list view of variants", we don't want to show
impossible combination on the list.
We also don't want the user to be able to add to cart an impossible variant.
Show appropriate messages when no combination is possible.
Order
=====
We want the variant order to be consistent with what the user selected with the
sequence fields. The display order on the website should be the same than the
display on the various backend views.
This implies also fixing the order of:
- product.attribute
- product.attribute.value
- product.template.attribute.line
- product.template.attribute.value
The general order is now: (parent,) sequence, id.
Before, it was already a mix of those, but not always in the same order, and not
every key for every model. The name has been removed from the order: either we
sequence them correctly, or we want them in the creation order.
On the website, the first combination shown by the python should be the same as
the one that will be computed by the JS to prevent flickering.
Ideally there should be no RPC at page loading if the python has computed
everything correctly, but it is currently not possible to achieve because the
view logic for website_sale_stock is only in JS.
================================================================================
*** Fix product template and variant price computation ***
Move and improve the get_combination_info method:
- take into account tax included/excluded settings (B2B/B2C)
- take into account pricelist discount policy (striked price)
- fix inconsistencies when price after pricelist would be 0
- use proper rounding and discount compute with the currency helper methods
- fix an issue where context "partner" would have a mix of id and recordset
================================================================================
*** Fix currency conversions ***
The list_price and lst_price of a product are always encoded using the currency
of the product.
The results of "combination info" are always returned using the currency of the
pricelist if given, or the currency of the product.
The prices on an order (line) are encoded with the currency of its pricelist.
================================================================================
*** Fix dynamic variants access rights ***
Public users on the e-commerce should be able to create product variants if the
configuration of the attributes of the product template is set as "dynamic".
This uses "sudo" to bypass create security rules for public users.
Multiple checks are done to ensure that it creates a valid product variant.
================================================================================
*** Miscellaneous bugs, tracebacks and necessary improvements ***
In general:
- correctly show warning when no variant is possible
- don't let user add to cart an impossible variant (from optional product
modal or from any RPC), both in interface and controller logic
- fix as much flickering as possible by correctly pre-computing in python/views
- move business logic from controllers to models
- correctly add no_variant and is_custom values on the SO line description
Sale order:
- fix traceback when emptying the product_id field from configurator
website_sale:
- correctly compute first image / carousel, and correctly swap images when
changing variants, without duplicate image or zoom problems
- don't use list view of variants when it doesn't make sense
- added missing product info when adding a no_variant attribute to cart
- fix cart accessory product computation
website_sale_wishlist:
- fix it with dynamic variants, no_variant and is_custom
website_sale_comparison:
- fix it with dynamic variants (comparison and alternative products)
website_sale_stock:
- fix it in general (some flickering still present)
================================================================================
Authored by @seb-odoo with contribution from @awa-odoo
task-1910821
closesodoo/odoo#28079
Set a BOM to create 10^k units of Product P, using n units of raw material R.
On R, put rounding to 1 unit.
Create a MO to produce 1 unit of P.
Since it needs n/10^k units and rounding is set to 1,
it sets 1 unit of R to consume.
Now "update" (quantity to produce) to 10^k'.
It correctly updates the quantity to consume.
However, since it doesn't update the unit_factor, when you "produce",
it will consume 10^k' units instead of 1.
We copy the way the unit_factor is initially computed when updating the lines.
opw 1903776
closesodoo/odoo#29067
Usecase to reproduce:
- Set manufacture step to 2 or 3 steps
- Create a MO
- Go on the PC picking and validate some quantities w/h BO
Traceback because there is no documents to log the activity.
It happens because the function used in groupby and sorted
(in the method _log_less_quantities_than_expected) expect a picking.
The purpose of _log_less_quantities_than_expected is to generate
an activity on the next picking in order to notify that some quantities
will be missing due to the cancelation of the back order. In order
to find the following picking it uses the destination moves from the
current's picking moves.
Picking w/h BO Next Picking (activity to post)
| |
moves -----------> destination moves
However in the case of 'pick components' picking type(PC) the destination
moves are linked to a manufacturing order and not a picking. So it
_log_activity_get_documents return an empty parent since picking_id is
False.
In order to fix it, _log_activity_get_documents only add the tuple
(object where the activity should be log, responsible for the activity)
if the object is not False. It also add a hook in order to add
(mo_id, repsonsible) during _log_less_quantities_than_expected on top
of (picking_id, repsonsible) in order to log activity on MO directly
linked to PC.
This commit also add a missing precision_rounding in backorder
confirmation
opw-1908753
closesodoo/odoo#29385
Once we log an exception via next activity in a production, we search moves that have been updated uphill to write the useful information about the change. The issue is by default, the key 'move_orig_id' is searched while some moves could be linked with 'created_purchase_line_id' key.
This commit avoid mapping 'move_orig_id' on empty recordset and so avoid a traceback.
opw:1911399
closesodoo/odoo#29087
Suppose you have a workorder to create n units of product P,
using raw material R (suppose we use one for one, the following can be extended
to any number of raw materials and factors in a straightforward manner).
Produce j < n units of P. Next, update the quantity to produce to j < k < n.
Since any number m of units between j and n may already have been reserved,
in particular values such that m > k, the move will unreserve the material R.
However, while doing so it will unlink the move_lines, and lose the
quantity_done (j).
The newly created move lines have a quantity_done of zero by default.
Therefore, we store in a dictionary the quantities done for each move line,
and reset these values once the unreservation/reservation of k units is done.
opw 1911969
closesodoo/odoo#28990
On the BoM structure report the price on line with a
child BoM is inchoerent. Also the sum of all lines in
the report is not always equals to the total of the parent
line.
For the first issue, it happens due to commit 17b6256955
that use the number of operation cycle as quantity.
The second issue happens because sometimes the rounding is not done
at the smallest level and thus the rounding of the sum is different than
the sum of the rouding.
- Create the following BOM structure:
```
Prod 1 (Manufacture)
|
--- Prod 2
Prod 3 (Kit)
|
--- Prod 4
Prod 5
```
- The BOMs for Prod 1 & 3 must have a routing set, to generate
workorders
- Create a MO for 1 unit of Prod 1, process to the end
2 units of Prod 1 are created instead of 1.
This is due to the WO for Prod 3 not having a `next_work_order_id`.
Therefore, `record_production` adds an extra quantity at:
```
production_move.quantity_done += self.qty_producing
```
To prevent this, we set as `next_work_order_id` of the BOM of Prod 3 the
WO of Prod 1.
Closes#19527
opw-1817398
opw-1883693