Have a recurring meeting, repeated until some date
Edit one of the instances and detach it (click on "update only this instance")
Edit the detached event and change some value
Save
Before this commit, a JS error was thrown saying that the field final_date was invalid
This was because the required attribute on this field was set to True, but the python
put the value of the final_date to False
After this commit, there is no error as we set this value to false, since the field
doesn't make sense for a non-recurring event anyway
OPW 1892426
closesodoo/odoo#28850
Be in the timezone Australia/Brisbane
On an object, create a Meeting activity
Create the calendar event and set a start date "tomorrow" at 7:00am
Now go back to the object to see the activity
Before this commit, the activity appeared as due "today"
After this commit, it is due "tomorrow"
OPW 1891110
closesodoo/odoo#28576
Be in timezone Europe/Brussels, where, in 2018, the DST switch
happens on 2018-10-28.
Create a recurring event starting on 2018-10-27 until 2018-10-29
at say, 8am
For the days before the 28, the time of the event will be correct
Before this commit though, for the days after the 28,
the meeting time will be shifted by one hour
This is because the rrule took a TZ aware datetime, and generated recurring
event dates with that same TZ, i.e. the one in STD time
After, this commit, all the meetings are well scheduled at 8am,
OPW 1895315
closesodoo/odoo#27985
With a user in a distant timezone, like UTC +/- 11
Create a all day event.
Before this commit, the event was displayed across the wrong days
This was because the dates were converted from the user's timezone
into UTC before being stored.
Which is:
- start date at december, 12
- if the user's tz is utc-11: the date becomes december, 11 (at 1:00pm)
- at rendering, it becomes december, 11 (at 7:00am)
After this commit, we store the datetime field "as if" it were a date field
that is, we don't convert it to any particular tz
It is worth noting that, if one removes the allday mapping in the xml view,
an event that has been created as allday will get its start and stop date converted
to the browser's timezone, and will NOT be displayed as from 8am to 8pm as one could expect
This is considered as a limitation of the code, that was present before this commit anyway.
In any case, please do not revert this commit :D
OPW 1891110
closesodoo/odoo#27949
When sorting by a many2many fields (e.g. partner_ids) with one of the record
having an empty value on the sorted field, the comparison method used to compare
and empty record (e.g. res.partner()) and a name_get result (e.g. "Agrolait").
This is because the sort_field was initialized with the result of self[field]
but never assigned a new value below.
Fallback on an empty string when no record is found
Fixes#26908
Since 76b7242 if we have a recurring event with 3 occurences:
[4th 4:00-4th 5:00] [14th 4:00-14th 5:00] [24th 4:00-24th 4:00]
And we detach the first one to modify it, then when getting the
info of reccurring events not detached the system get:
- starts: [14th 4:00] [24th 4:00]
- stops: [4th 5:00] [14th 5:00] [24th 5:00]
And wrongly apply the current filtering over:
[14th 4:00-4th 5:00] [24th 4:00-14th 5:00]
So the issue hides recurrences of event wrongly if:
- they have not been detached
- they don't have a duration of 0
- one or several previous events have been detached
- the stop date of the nth previous event occurrence (nth equaling
number of detached previous events) is not in the current filtering.
With this change, the stops are also filtered based on start of
occurrence + duration.
Without the change, the added test fails with:
False != '155-20120301120100' : Last event should be found searching it by date range
note: for 10.0 up to not including 11.0 which is solved with #26901
opw-1866151
closes#26887
Since 76b7242 if we have a recurring event with 3 occurences:
[4th 4:00-4th 5:00] [14th 4:00-14th 5:00] [24th 4:00-24th 4:00]
And we detach the first one to modify it, then when getting the
info of reccurring events not detached the system get:
- starts: [14th 4:00] [24th 4:00]
- stops: [4th 5:00] [14th 5:00] [24th 5:00]
And wrongly apply the current filtering over:
[14th 4:00-4th 5:00] [24th 4:00-14th 5:00]
So the issue hides recurrences of event wrongly if:
- they have not been detached
- they don't have a duration of 0
- one or several previous events have been detached
- the stop date of the nth previous event occurrence (nth equaling
number of detached previous events) is not in the current filtering.
With this change, the stops are also filtered based on start of
occurrence + duration.
Without the change, the added test fails with:
False != '27-20120301120100' : Last event should be found searching it by date range
note: 11.0 version of 10.0 #26887
opw-1866151
closes#26901
When creating and editing a new calendar.event record from the calendar
view, the start_datetime field does not prefill from the day that was
selected on the calendar.
Introduced in e08f999468
opw-1875276
When creating an event using the list view, no value is set in the
fields start and stop.
If selecting all day, we could only change the value of start_date and
stop_date which does not change the value in start or stop.
This makes it impossible to create an event from the list view.
This problem is not present in the calendar view since this view sets a
value in start and stop, and the start and stop are recomputed via the
inverse fields.
Closes#25680
The end time of a calendar event is constrained to never be before the start
of te event.
However when updating events, one path would first update the start of the event
before updating the end of the event.
So in case where (s_1, e_1) is updated by (s_2, e_2),
with respectively s_i < e_i,
if s2 > e1 then the update would violate the constraint and thus crash
the calendar update.
opw 1854394
Consider the following:
``` python
from datetime import datetime
from dateutil import rrule
import pytz
dt = pytz.UTC.localize(datetime(2016, 9, 2, 15, 42, 43, 205))
rset = rrule.rrulestr('FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=2;BYDAY=SU,FR,SA', dtstart=dt, forceset=True, tzinfos={})
test = [d for d in rset]
```
This will generate the following error:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dateutil/rrule.py", line 1164, in _iter
advance_iterator(ritem)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dateutil/rrule.py", line 1091, in __next__
self.dt = advance_iterator(self.gen)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dateutil/rrule.py", line 649, in _iter
date = datetime.date.fromordinal(ii.yearordinal+i)
ValueError: year is out of range
```
If such an event is received from Google Calendar, the synchronization
crashes. To avoid this, we enforce a `COUNT` condition if the latter or
`UNTIL` is not explicitly specified. This gives:
``` python
rset = rrule.rrulestr('FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=2;BYDAY=SU,FR,SA;COUNT=100', dtstart=dt, forceset=True, tzinfos={})
```
Note that this was supposed to be fixed in
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/9dcc32c3041e7ad3549a09c5ed68ee3ef22c7a26/addons/calendar/models/calendar.py#L1287
However, this was working with the old API. The new API and its computed
fields does something different:
1. create the calendar event with the provided `rrule`
2. trigger the inverse method `_inverse_rrule` => `count=100` is added
to the computed parameters
3. however, doing so won't recompute `rrule` for obvious reasons (it was
the initial value provided, so we don't recompute it)
4. the crash is met in `_get_recurrent_date_by_event` when using
`self.rrule`
The fundamental issue is that `_inverse_rrule` is not strictly the
inverse of `_compute_rrule`.
Fixes#25189
opw-1861658
From a SO (for example), create an activity with type meeting
Create the calendar event
Access it as a guest with the route with the token
Before this commit, there was an error 500 because the description
of the event actually contained "\n" and was not parseable
After this commit, we strip the string at event creation, and no error occur
OPW 1867283
closes#25795
Courtesy of Juan José Scarafía, ADHOC
The quality of the Spanish (Argentina) translations is very poor.
Remove them all and will start from scratch, translating only when needed.