Since https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/5a030db3eb77b6d80187f8ae1a64303b2f50391d
the HTML editor displayed the translated versions of the templates it
allows to customize. So if the user edited and saved such a template,
the non-translated version was saved with translated-version content.
The behavior before the mentioned commit was:
1) Load all views the HTML editor allows to edit
2) Each time a view is displayed, re-make a RPC to load the view again
The mentioned commit made this simpler by making:
1) Load all views the HTML editor allows to edit
2) Each time a view is displayed, simply show the previously loaded view
... the problem was that the step (2) of the old behavior was
explicitly saying (client-side) to load the view's untranslated content.
This commit makes step (1) always load the untranslated versions of the
views (server-side).
When an inline editor is eg. in a form view, the focus is always stolen
by it.
This is because we trigger a mouseup on the editor to update its
toolbars values and informations.
note: backport of 11.0's 7a453b0b7a
In 10.0 this trigger could cause a "blur" which in some instance is not
wanted (eg. inside a newline of a list view).
opw-1906581
closes#31078
The html widget automatically replace an empty field value by
`<p><br></p>` to be able to add content.
But this may cause unintended "onchange", since the value has "changed"
and the onchange themself could cause error when triggered at the wrong
time (eg. inside a list view with required fields).
With this changeset, the onchange is averted when the value was false
and is now `<p><br></p>`.
opw-1906581
closes#31078
When dropping a snippet into a page, it is dropped in the drop-zone
which is the nearest of the user cursor. When moving a snippet, that
condition did not apply and the user was required to put the cursor at
the exact location of the drop-zone.
Also, for both drag and drop features, the drop zones which appeared
were not displayed correctly for full width columns, which made dropping
sometimes impossible when multiple col-*-12 were below each other.
task-1937758
closesodoo/odoo#30899
On firefox if we do for example:
ALT+GR + [ALT+GRable ´ key]
Firefox may send keys "AltGr" and "Dead" instead of just "AltGr".
This was possibly causing caret to go a position too low when writing
speedily with diacritical marks.
opw-1903865
closes#28739
If resetting a background color was the only edition that was done on a
page and that this page was saved, the change was not properly saved
as the page was not marked as dirty.
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/27625
task-1879524
On Safari, when editing the template of a mail.mass_mailing,
clicking the "Read more" button (or any button that can
have a link to the website) didn't open pop up to set
the URL of the website.
PS: inspired from https://github.com/textAngular/textAngular/issues/762
opw:1889643
If we do:
- one change that will be saved in history
- go back to the document before any change
- do other change
we can easily get in a state were the history is no longer recorded.
The history is kept like this:
- pos: our position in the history
- aUndo: the snapshots of history
- toSnap: the last history snapshop that is to be saved
so for example if we start without change (at originalState):
{pos: 0, aUndo=[], toSnap=null}
Then we do two changes (change1, change2):
{pos: 2, aUndo=[originalState, change1], toSnap=change2}
If we make an undo, we will get to:
{pos: 1, aUndo=[originalState,change1,change2], toSnap=null)
If we make another change (change3):
{pos: 2, aUndo=[originalState, change1], toSnap=change3}
So the history after the position is removed.
But when we get back to the original, the state would forever be:
{pos: 0, aUndo=[originalState], toSnap=change85}
because when doing a change, the code only removed history from the
max(pos, 1) index.
opw-1870119
closes#26701
In the editor in a table cell, when we press UP/DOWN keys:
- we have default editor/browser behavior if there is content before
(UP) or after (DOWN) the element we are currently on
- else we go to the previous (UP) or next (DOWN) row if available
- else we go to the next content if available
- else we have the default editor/browser behavior
But when checking if there is an element before/after the content, we
did not take into account if there was an ancestor node inside the cell
that had content after, so for example with this structure:
```
<table>
<tr><td>
<p>hello <b>world</b></p>
<p>cruel</p>
</td></tr>
<tr><td>
<p>bingo</p>
</td></tr>
</table>
```
if the current range was on 'world' text node, we would just check if
there is content after this text node, not if there is content after its
`<p/>` ancestor.
Before the fix we would get on the next row, after we would have default
editor/browser behavior: ie. if cruel is on another line, going to this
line.
opw-1870119
closes#26701
If we applied a link eg. on:
```
<span>hello <b>world</b></span>
```
The system actually gets the "label": hello worldworld because there is
3 nodes:
text node: hello
element node: `<b>world</b>`
text node: world
Also since "hello worldworld" is different than "hello world",
instead of just keeping existing nodes and adding the link, the system
would replace the selected range by:
`<span><a>hello worldworld</a></span>'
instead of:
`<span><a>hello </a><b><a>world</a></b></span>`
This commit ignores element nodes when creating a new link, since when
getting the label of the link from the selection, only the text nodes
insides the element nodes have any interest.
There was a second issue because if we had:
```
<i><a href="hello">world</a></i>!
```
and tried to put a link over "world!", the code would decide: "world" is
inside a link so we will just update that link.
Thus we would get:
```
<i><a href="hello">world!</a></i>!
```
instead of:
```
<i><a href="hello">world</a></i><a href="hello">!</a>
```
opw-1848351
closes#25187
Christophe Simonis