* event, website_event, website_forum,
* website_hr_recruitment, website_sale
Website access rights were buggy. The editor assets and website editor
assets have to be loaded together to work so the previous behavior
which only loaded one with the restricted access right was not right.
Also, people which had the "Manager" access right for model like event
or job only got access to creation and edition of those objects if they
had the full access to website access rights.
Now the website module creates the two same groups :
* group_website_publisher: load all editor assets, give access to
page creation for model the user has access (event, job, ...) and
edition of those pages
* group_website_designer: implies the first one and give access in
creation and edition of all pages + access of all website menus
The manager access rights for event, product, jobs, etc now implies
the group_website_publisher group for the user (so that the manager
have the editor assets and editor ui).
Note: some python codes use the group_website_publisher for no right
reason, this has to be adapted.
Several modules defines records with the external ID `base.foo_bar` while it is
created inside this module (typically menus and groups).
While there is no technical reasons to do so but this may introduce issues:
- these records will not be deleted during uninstall
- if a language is loaded before the installation of the module, it won't be
translated
The uninstallation will only remove the records with an external id linked to
this module (these would only be removed when removing base).
Installing a language before the module will drop the translations not linked
to an existing external id (as it can not be resolved).
This commit correct all the external ids tagged as from base or other incorrect
modules.
Before this commit when you edit a contact with the editor, you didn't see
the selected record before the save.
Now, you can edit a contact with the html editor.
We move the hacked field self (on res.partner) from website_partner to base.
2 bugs:
field and record was reversed in call
need to pass a browseRecord and not a dict, because we uses .env on it
This hack allow to use widget='contact' on the browse record
itself and not on a specific field from the browse record
Eg:
<div t-field="partner.self" t-options='{
"widget": "contact",
"fields": ["address", "phone"]
}'/>
Since saas-3, website controllers use `request.website.render`
to render the template of a web page. This was kept for retro
compatibility. It's time to stop using deprecated stuff.
Same for `_render` method on website.
'json' route don't use `request.render` since
`JsonRequest` has no `render` method.
Moisés López