- Activate the MTO route on SO lines
- Activate the route "Buy" on a Product A without quantity on hand, add
a supplier
- Create a SO with 2 lines. First line is Product A, second line is
Product A with route MTO
- Confirm the SO, run the procurement if necessary
- Confirm the PO, receive the products
- On the picking generated from the SO, you should have one line
"Waiting Availability" (the line not MTO) and one line "Available"
(the line MTO).
- Click "Recheck Availability". One reserved quant from line 2 is moved
to line 1.
A trick is to assign first the move with ancestors, so we don't "steal"
the reservation on the other move.
Fixes#15950
opw-725373
When you have multiplle global push rules with the same source location,
a traceback is raised because the '_apply' method of
"stock.location.path" is called with more than one record, and doesn't
handle multiple record.
To fix this, we limit the number of records returned when a global rule
is searched to 1 (as for other 'search' of push rules in this file).
This bug has been introduced during migration in rev: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/cb486d7eb6353a66eea2cb3610141b4f3a778791
opw-725874
Before this, the stock user had readonly ACL on the scraping action. He
therefore could not scrap products during his normal operations. It is assumed,
that this was not an intended default, as not being otherwise documented.
Closes#15955
It is still possible to have negative and positive quants in the same
location because of returns: if you send something to the customer that
is not there and you return it, you will still be able to reserve the
returned goods to send to another client.
Before, if you would do an inventory adjustment, it would not take into
account these returned quants and their negative counterpart, which made
them difficult to get out of the system.
This fix takes them into account by creating two movements for one
inventory line: move the positive counterpart to the inventory location
before getting back from this location the same quantity.
This way, even if you have 0 as quantity on hand but you have those 2
quants, it will eliminate them. (if you are increasing the stock, part
of the process might have done it automatically already).
Test cases contributed by @jir-odoo
When creating a stock.picking, the related fields picking_type_entire_packs and
picking_type_code were both updated.
This was an issue was required write access on stock.picking.type (warehouse
manager) to create a stock.picking (warehouse user).
The fields were updated as they were present in the view and filled with the
related value. Even if the value was unchanged, it was triggering a write
anyway.
The two fields were in invisible="1" and used only in attrs for other fields.
Making these two fields in readonly does not prevent to use it in the attrs but
avoid to send a value to the server and trigger a useless write.
Fixes#15769
In method `_check_delivery_resupply`, `new_location` is used in a
`write` call. This expects an integer (id).
However, `new_location` is the result of `_get_input_output_locations`,
which returns a recordset.
opw-716141
The total quantity of an inventory only makes sense if the same product is
counted.
This commit avoids useless recompute of the field when a ligne is changed.
The trigger were missing meaning it was recomputed after any change, slowing
down already unefficiant large inventory.
When there is no move line linked to the picking, the customer address must
be the address of the partner linked to the stock.pick
Fixes#15092
opw:707890
When making an inventory adjustment in multi company,
the default location_id was all the time taken from
'stock.warehouse0' even if the user was not allowed to read
the warehouse. Inspired from _get_default_location in pos_config.py
Backport of 8955d15e9d
opw:706704
Before this patch, it was not possible to manually process a pack (i.e.
checking the "is_done" box), because the field was always reset
*before* saving. It was still possible to process it by hitting
"validate", but it was not possible to put a pack in a pack.
Manually process a pack means hitting the checkbox "is_done" on the pack
operation. This "is_done" field is a boolean computed field with a reverse
function, and this reverse function set the "qty_done" on the pack
operation to 1.0.
The compute field doesn't have any depends declared, so the value was
invalidated after any changes in the form view. The computed method was
used to check the checkbox is the "qty_done" is set to 1.0. It was
probably used to check the checkbox when opening later a picking for
which the pack was already processed.
The issue is that the "qty_done" was never updated, because the inverse
method is only called when saving, and the compute method already reset
the "is_done" field to False, as the "qty_done" was not updated.
To fix this issue, we do not use an inverse method but an onchange.
Indeed, this was the expected behavior: hitting the checkbox should
change the "qty_done".
We already have a test covering this use case, committed in v9 [1]. It
didn't discovered this regression because the test was using directly
the "qty_done" field on the pack operation, not the "is_done" field used
in the view. We change the test to use the "is_done" field and manually
trigger the onchanges.
This is due to a bad new API migration [2].
[1] rev e248420348
[2] rev d8548e0771
Odoo Translation Bot