This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
Now that the multi company mode is much more easier to
activate, it is needed to display this information on the
tree views, to help people to know on which company is
set some records in list view.
task-1997637
Closes: #3397closesodoo/odoo#33976
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closesodoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
After deep comparison between majors versions, it seems that
there is no breaking changes and this fix a lot of issues in
mobile.
e.g.:
Before this update, the validity date wasn't correctly formated
and the end user had to enter the right format himself.
Some users were blocked at the payment process.
The root cause for this issue is the inconsistent list of native
events triggered by mobile devices.
Note that this library is only used for acquirer forms (S2S Form
Template) when "Redirection to the acquirer website" is checked
(payment_flow == 's2s') in the acquirer configuration.
We are aware that this library is deprecated and should be replaced
in the future.
See https://github.com/stripe/jquery.payment
opw-1986545
closes#33356closesodoo/odoo#33376
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
when we get an error while making the payment, it should be shown to the user.
But the message is not getting from proper dict, so it will break every time.
closes - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/33231closesodoo/odoo#33231
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
simplification of payments objects and refactoring of the code
* registering payment(s) from the list of invoice now generate a single payment per invoice selected
* no more abstract object for payments/payment wizard as the logic is now really simple:
- group_invoices option is now removed and we never try to group payments based on the currency/customer of whatsoever (see above),
- the payment amount is the full residual amount of invoice and users cannot change it anymore
* partner_bank_account_id not required as soon as visible (depends on the payment method)
* refactoring to name tags and allow easier inheritance via xpath
part of task #1918423
- When validating payments on the payment process polling page
errors can occurs and the tracebacks aren't logged which doesn't help
when trying to understand the issues.
With this commit we display the traceback instead of shadowing them.
closesodoo/odoo#33537
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
- When processing payments on the payments processing page,
`psycopg2.OperationalError` can be raised.
We do not want those exceptions to be displayed to the customers,
instead we want the polling page to try to process the payments again.
This commit hides the display of psycopg2 operational errors.
- This commit also fixes the "processing your payments" message being
hidden after the first polling, no matter if the processing has succeeded or not.
closesodoo/odoo#33462
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
This prevent the uninstallation of all payment provider through the
NOT NULL constraint. There is no reason for this field to be explicitely
required - it will fail if the template is wrong anyway.
closesodoo/odoo#33170
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
This commit introduces the Alipay payment provider, a popular acquirer
in the Chinese market.
There are 2 possible ways to use this acquirer:
- express checkout mode (only available for merchants located in CN)
- standard checkout mode (availabe for foreign merchants)
Note that this provider does not support server-to-server payments,
tokenization or any other bells and whistles besides fees. There are no
specific behaviours related to this acquirer, it behaves like most 'form
based' payment acquirers with a form submission, s2s notification from
the provider as well as redirect in case the s2s did not reach the
server in time.
closesodoo/odoo#21855
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Currently, when some add token for s2s payment, dummy transaction of
1 unit was performed and it was frautrating for customer.
So added option on acquirer's settings that check if you want's
to validate the transaction or not.
If 'verify Card validity' is ticked on payment acquirer then and then
it will verify with dummy transaction otherwise it will not going to verify
the card details.
Task-1903170
closesodoo/odoo#29595
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
* = hr, im_livechat, mail, payment, purchase, web, web_editor, web_unsplash,
website_profile, website_slides
Since the merge of all image tools into one function, the intermediary functions
are not needed anymore.
task-1958000
PR: #31811
Suppose that a payment transaction cannot be reconciled for any reason.
Then _cron_post_process_after_done will try to process it every 10 minutes until
the end of time.
Moreover, if the user takes some manual action before
_cron_post_process_after_done,
even if in principle it would have been able to go through,
then it is likely to fail, e.g. on invoice_open.
Meaning that a transaction that could have been processed will become
an undead transaction.
To avoid that situation we set an arbitrary retry_limit_date set to 2 days,
which seems a reasonnable compromise.
It gives some time for the transaction to go through, but not exaggeratedly so.
opw 1945953
closesodoo/odoo#31791
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
Sequentially previewing and paying two sale orders was causing a
redirection issue. Instead of being redirect to the SO preview
(/my/orders/<:order_id>), the user was redirected to /payment/process.
The issue was due to processed transactions not being removed from the
session.
opw-1948288
Closes#31741
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
Render from payment//payment_acquirer.py promises:
All templates will receive:
'feedback_url', 'return_url', 'cancel_url', 'error_url'
However they are all in -> FIXME.
After 6 years in FIXME, this promise is still a lie.
It is unfortunate since the Adyen payment provider requires 'return_url' to work.
Before, this function was called by _get_shop_payment_values,
which provided a value for it.
We copy the value that was given there directly as a default in render,
so that it doesn't crash no matter what method calls it.
opw 1928918
opw 1944142
closesodoo/odoo#31814
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
When sequentially paying multiple SO with wire transfer, the user was
always redirected to the first paid SO.
This commit fixes this issue by redirecting to the most recent one.
Technical choice:
payment_transaction rows are ordered by id desc so we can trust the
first one will be the most recent on the client side (in the scope of
this diff).
opw-1949629
Closes#31754
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
Denis Ledoux