When you have push rules on move having a 'production_id', the
'production_id' is copied on the generated moves. So it generate a
traceback when we check the tracking method of 'product_id' on
produce_move.
This issue is caused because we get multiple produce_move instead of
one.
To fix this issue, we don't copy the production_id anymore on moves
generated by push rules.
In function _get_top_level_packages, when checking that all the products
have the same destination, the destinations must be stocked in a set
instead of a list because with different products it could return a list
with duplicated destinations.
opw:725720
When we validate a SO with an MTO product, then an RFQ and a delivery
picking are created. The status of the delivery picking is in state
'confirmed', but should be 'waiting' as the delivery waits for a
specific delivery input.
The problem is caused by the unreserve method, which is called in the
'procurement_jit' module. This method only checks that a move has
ancestors to determine if the move should be in waiting or in confirmed,
which is not the case for our delivery move because the RFQ has not been
validated yet so there is not ancestors yet.
To fix this issue, we check the 'procure_method' of the move, and if it
is in 'make_to_order' we put it in 'waiting' instead of 'confirmed'.
We also fixed the function recalculate_move_state that could cause the
same problem.
- Create a kit (phantom BOM), composed of 2 different products A and B
- Create a SO, sell a random stockable product, confirm and validate the
picking.
- Edit the SO, add the kit and save.
Two pickings are created, one for product A and one for product B.
Commit 8fe8ca9948 forces the recomputation of the stock moves, in order
to be able to find a newly created picking. This should actually be done
after each picking creation.
opw-725929
On large databases, the orderpoint calculation can fail due to the huge
cache used diring the process.
Instead of using one cursor for the transaction, we create a new cursor
every 100 orderpoints, to limit the cache size and speed up the
performances.
opw-726711
Closes#16158
When there is no move line linked to the picking, the customer address must
be the address of the partner linked to the stock.pick
Backport of this commit: 79d8849
opw:725721
- Activate the MTO route on SO lines
- Activate the route "Buy" on a Product A without quantity on hand, add
a supplier
- Create a SO with 2 lines. First line is Product A, second line is
Product A with route MTO
- Confirm the SO, run the procurement if necessary
- Confirm the PO, receive the products
- On the picking generated from the SO, you should have one line
"Waiting Availability" (the line not MTO) and one line "Available"
(the line MTO).
- Click "Recheck Availability". One reserved quant from line 2 is moved
to line 1.
A trick is to assign first the move with ancestors, so we don't "steal"
the reservation on the other move.
Fixes#15950
opw-725373
When you have multiplle global push rules with the same source location,
a traceback is raised because the '_apply' method of
"stock.location.path" is called with more than one record, and doesn't
handle multiple record.
To fix this, we limit the number of records returned when a global rule
is searched to 1 (as for other 'search' of push rules in this file).
This bug has been introduced during migration in rev: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/cb486d7eb6353a66eea2cb3610141b4f3a778791
opw-725874
Before this, the stock user had readonly ACL on the scraping action. He
therefore could not scrap products during his normal operations. It is assumed,
that this was not an intended default, as not being otherwise documented.
Closes#15955
It is still possible to have negative and positive quants in the same
location because of returns: if you send something to the customer that
is not there and you return it, you will still be able to reserve the
returned goods to send to another client.
Before, if you would do an inventory adjustment, it would not take into
account these returned quants and their negative counterpart, which made
them difficult to get out of the system.
This fix takes them into account by creating two movements for one
inventory line: move the positive counterpart to the inventory location
before getting back from this location the same quantity.
This way, even if you have 0 as quantity on hand but you have those 2
quants, it will eliminate them. (if you are increasing the stock, part
of the process might have done it automatically already).
Test cases contributed by @jir-odoo
When creating a stock.picking, the related fields picking_type_entire_packs and
picking_type_code were both updated.
This was an issue was required write access on stock.picking.type (warehouse
manager) to create a stock.picking (warehouse user).
The fields were updated as they were present in the view and filled with the
related value. Even if the value was unchanged, it was triggering a write
anyway.
The two fields were in invisible="1" and used only in attrs for other fields.
Making these two fields in readonly does not prevent to use it in the attrs but
avoid to send a value to the server and trigger a useless write.
Fixes#15769
In method `_check_delivery_resupply`, `new_location` is used in a
`write` call. This expects an integer (id).
However, `new_location` is the result of `_get_input_output_locations`,
which returns a recordset.
opw-716141
The total quantity of an inventory only makes sense if the same product is
counted.
This commit avoids useless recompute of the field when a ligne is changed.
The trigger were missing meaning it was recomputed after any change, slowing
down already unefficiant large inventory.
Odoo Translation Bot