*website_crm_partner_assign, website_customer
Before this commit, some models would create their own `website_published`
field rather than using the `website.published.mixin` mixin which should be
used instead.
That was done to be able to override the default value of the boolean.
This commit simply adds the possibility to override the default value of the
mixin field.
Also, help and string could simply be added on xml views rather than overriding
the field.
The `website_published` field from the website's mixins is basically a readonly
from `is_published` field.
On read, this field will simply read `is_published` and check if the record's
website_id is accessible (only for the multi mixin).
On write, it will always write on `is_published`.
This commit improves a few things:
- A lot of code was writting on website_published which was just then writting
on is_published. Writting directly on is_published makes more sense.
- Some backend fields would still reference `website_published` instead of
`is_published` which would just go through the related for no reason.
Plus, using `is_published` will make the field tooltip more accurate as we
are not in a website context ('Visible on current website' to 'Is Published')
- Filter and search on tree view were still using the `website_published`
related field, which is just a readonly when we are not in a frontend
context.
- Some create and write function would have security check on
`website_published` value but that was wrong as the user could bypass that by
simply writting on `is_published`. For the write method, check `is_published`
is more accurate as it will cover both case since `website_published` will
then call the write method on `is_published`
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
Purpose
=======
Some formviews are useless since there are so few relevant fields https://nimb.ws/1EdMV7
For instance, to create a new lost reason the user is forced to:
1. Hit create
2. Type in the name of the record
3. Hit save
4. Go back to the treeview
While he could simply type them away in an editable treeview.
The goal of this task is to allow for creation/edition of records in such models
directly from the treeview.
Specification
=============
Modify tree views from a given list of models for which the
treeview has to be made editable bottom.
If not specified otherwise, the content treeview should stay the same.
If a field is readonly/required/etc. in the formview, it should be in the
editable treeview as well.
Relabeling has to be done of the field itself, not in the view.
TaskID: 2026126
closesodoo/odoo#34577
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closesodoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
When website_customer is not installed, some endpoints are not handled
by the router, causing the following tests to fail:
- test_10_crawl_public
- test_20_crawl_demo
- test_30_crawl_admin
Those tests were failing due to /customers responding with 404.
Indeed, the route /customers is defined in website_customer, but had
some usage within website_crm_partner_assign, causing tests to fail when
the former module is not installed.
The new behavior can be explained as follows:
- module website_crm_partner_assign on its own will lose the hyperlink.
- module website_customer will now inherit the view definition in order
to wrap the targeted HTML text elements with an anchor tag.
Closes#33344
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
Odoo Translation Bot