On old apple devices (IPad 2, IPhone 4, ...), the FAQ Roller could not
be opened on click. This is because the snippet does not use standard
bootstrap correctly and put the toggle on a <div/> element instead of
a <a/> element.
This fix forces an empty click handler on these <div/>, which allows
standard bootstrap to work.
Publish buttons appeared in list view item in /shop with commit
5a5dd1e100.
They however never worked for some reasons:
* The publish buttons were unclickable as the around style was badly
implemented: the section title was over the publish button
* Even if it was clickable, the publish button handler had no prevent
default, thus it submitted the form it is in -> crash when no cart
button or added to cart on click on publish button if there was a cart
button...
Note: the style should be reviewed in next versions, this commit, as
a 9.0 fix, fixes the style with the minimum code and so that it does
not break any theme.
Removing a slide was buggy :
* Removing the last slide left the slide handles (and the user had to
click on remove slide again)
* There was an ugly delay before the removal
* Changing the bg image of a slide was not possible anymore once one
slide was removed
* ...
Google made the use of an API key mandatory to use the "Google Static
Maps API". The API key field will be created for the upcoming version.
opw-686510
When a user try to create a new page info, he is redirected
to the /page/info because the xmlid already exists...
The problem is that this view need to be rendered via the
controller /website/info which gives some extra values (version, ...)
The fix for v8 is to redirect /page/info to /website/info.
In V9, the behavior is changed and one page info-1 will be created.
But this fix is also required for direct access to /page/info.
To do in master: maybe use another xml_id that this basic name 'info'?
This commit fix issue #8022
/!\ This is a backport from saas-10
When duplicating a question in the FAQ Roller snippet, the cloned
question was opening the original answer instead of its own answer.
The id of the user to browse has been omitted
during the below forward port revision:
95a2f8b121
We can see in the original revision that it was
correctly there:
cbb51610ee
This had as wrong side-effect to not display
views with a group set in the customize menu,
as it checked the groups of a null user browse
recordset.
opw-684326
Closes#12895
qsm-odoo