Multicurrency is ON
Your company in USD
Make a bank journal in EUR
Create a statement and push reconcile
In the widget, create a line with a tax and hit reconcile
Before this commit, the amount_currency field of the tax move line was not filled
After this commit it is
OPW 1885014
closesodoo/odoo#27592
Let's consider an aged partner balance with a period of 30 days as of
2019-02-08. The specific dates used in the report are:
``` python
bisou = datetime.strptime('2019-02-08', "%Y-%m-%d").date()
for x in [0, 1, 30, 31, 60, 61, 90, 91, 120, 121]:
print(x, bisou + relativedelta(days=-x))
0 2019-02-08
1 2019-02-07
30 2019-01-09
31 2019-01-08
60 2018-12-10
61 2018-12-09
90 2018-11-10
91 2018-11-09
120 2018-10-11
121 2018-10-10
```
However, the current periods generated are incorrect:
```
{'name': '0-30', 'stop': '2019-02-08', 'start': '2019-01-09'}
{'name': '30-60', 'stop': '2019-01-08', 'start': '2018-12-09'}
{'name': '60-90', 'stop': '2018-12-08', 'start': '2018-11-08'}
{'name': '90-120', 'stop': '2018-11-07', 'start': '2018-10-08'}
{'name': '+120', 'stop': '2018-10-07', 'start': False}
```
There is a clear inconsistency between the name of the period and the
date used. Moreover, the name is misleading: 0-30 includes the -0 date,
while 30-60 doesn't include the -30 date.
After the fix, the name and the periods are consistent. We also change
the first period to 1-30 since including 0 would mean to include amounts
which are not due yet.
```
{'name': '1-30', 'stop': '2019-02-07', 'start': '2019-01-09'}
{'name': '31-60', 'stop': '2019-01-08', 'start': '2018-12-10'}
{'name': '61-90', 'stop': '2018-12-09', 'start': '2018-11-10'}
{'name': '91-120', 'stop': '2018-11-09', 'start': '2018-10-11'}
{'name': '+120', 'stop': '2018-10-10', 'start': False}
```
opw-1886633
closesodoo/odoo#27294
In the invoice form view, remove the editable attribute on the invoice line tree
Create an invoice, click add an item in the invoice_line_ids field
Before this commit there was a crash because the tree view contains analytic_tag_ids
but the invoice line form doesn't
After this commit, there is no crash and the invoice line form works as exepected
OPW 1889107
closesodoo/odoo#27382
- From the accounting dashboard, click on the 'Reconcile' button of a
bank journal
- Click on the 'Bank reconciliation' text at the top left
- Click on the 'OK' button that just appears
A traceback occurs.
This event is used to change the name of the statement, when clicking on
'Reconcile' from a bank statemet. In this case, it shouldn't do
anything.
opw-1883308
closesodoo/odoo#27359
When paying an invoice in USD, using EUR as payment. The residual amount was shown in the payment currency instead of the original invoice residual currency.
closesodoo/odoo#26916
Making a bank account reconcilable is a very common mistake, and leads to confusing and useless data (the move lines made on this account) to be displayed in the reconciliation widget. With this commit, we make sure the user cannot make this mistake anymore.
In a multicompany environment, if the user is not logged-in in the same company as the statement's company (even though he might have access to it), the reconcile interface was filtering on the user's company instead of the bank statement lines's company.
Was PR #26782
Steps to reproduce:
Create a customer invoice with 2 product A and refund 1 product A.
Display account.invoice.report for this custumer.
Bug:
The quantity should be 1 not 3.
Fine tuning of this commit: e890682656
opw:1868116
backport 1dbc655676
Company in USD
Invoice in EUR with rate A
Register a payment in EUR with rate B
Unreconcile them.
Before this commit, there was an error because we tried to reconcile the exchange items
with its reversal while the formers were already reconciled with the invoice
After this commit, there is no error
OPW 1864091
closes#26583
In the reconciliation widget, search for an amount like 5361.61
Before this commit, if the targetted line that you want to see was represented as 5361.61000001
you did not see it in the results of the search
After this commit, you do!
OPW 1872543
closes#26523
Before this commit, the function that computes the aged partner balance
could return a list instead of a dict if no partner were found
After this commit, we make the function's signature consistent
closes#26095
Have the main company (A) with the public user
Have an invoice in company B
Make a brand new browser access the invoice with the token
Before this commit: the token link ended up asking the customer to login,
eventhough it wouldn't if the invoice were in company A
After this commit: the whole payment with access token flow works as expected.
OPW 1879999
closes#26744
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a journal "Temporary" with default account
(don't care about the names) with Fixed asset type and reconcile = True
- Create a vendor bill
- Create a payment from this vendor bill in the temporary journal
- Create a bank statement and with a line where you specify the vendor
- Try to reconcile the temporary account with the bank account
Bug:
Impossible because the temporary account item was not displayed
opw:1884376
Lucas Perais (lpe)