... in session_storage.
The current action is stored in the session_storage (stringified),
so that it can always be restored on F5 (useful for dynamic
actions). Before this rev., it was stored with it's 'raw' context,
i.e. before its evaluation. However, when this context is an
instance of a CompoundContext, it is meaningless once restored.
So this rev. ensures that the action is stored with its evaluated
context.
Recently, rev. c0809dd41 removed a protection in the reload of
Kanban views with progressbars. This protection ensured that the
manual reload of the progressbars was only done when one of the
records of the Kanban view was updated (and not when a column, or
the whole view was).
However, removing it highlighted a bug linked to the manual reload
of progressbars, which messed up the list of ids in the
environment. As a consequence, for instance, if the user archived
the records of a column, and then opendc a record in form view,
it couldn't use the pager anymore.
Besides fixing this bug, this rev. re-introduces the protection,
and refines it to prevent 2 useless RPCs when the whole Kanban
view was reloaded.
opw~1841276
opw~1841342
Before this commit, we had the following issue with binary widget in a form:
Suppose we have a binary field with filename attribute set. When uploading a
new file 'temp.txt' with content 'Cg==', the displayed value is 'Cg=='. When
the changes are saved, the displayed value becomes 'temp.txt'.
It should always display 'temp.txt', which is what is fixed by this commit.
In addition to fixing this issue, we describe what is the expected displayed
value of a binary field. This is based on whether the attribute filename is
provided, and whether the record is in edit or read-only mode.
Fixes#21630Closes#24275
Co-authored-by: Nick Booker <nick.booker@opusvl.com>
Assume a one2many field inside a form, displaying field A in its
list view, and a field B in its (dialog) form view. Moreover, there
is an action button in the dialog, which updates the value of B.
Before this rev., B wasn't correctly reloaded when the button was
clicked, because the BasicModel reloaded the fields on the list
view (i.e. field A), whereas it should reload the fields in both
views.
This fix is twofold. First, we force the viewType to 'form' when
the record is reloaded, instead of the default ('list'), so that
fields in the form view are correctly reloaded. Second, when we
open the form view in the dialog, we add the fields of the list
view to the dict of fields of the form view, so that the form
is aware of those fields and can ask the model to reload them
(still without displaying them).
Fixes#24189
When we edit a list view and change page before the change has been
savec, the saving and page changing will be done concurrently thus
possibly causing an error if the page is changed before the saved is
finished: the save will try to modify the page that is no more
displayed.
In this change, the list view editable wait for the saving to be
finished before reloading its content.
note: for 9.0 up to saas-15
opw-1839149
closes#24471
on Firefox, the focus was not set automatically on the search input when
the Q accesskey was used.
Now we set the focus before activating the item that is the target of
the accesskey
In the chart of account editor, which is an editable list with 2
contiguous monetary field, we could not change the first then move to
the second using the TAB key: the focus was not set on the input of the
second monetary field, and when it is, that input is destroyed and
recreated so the focus was lost
Before this fix, the user needed to hit TAB twice to move to the next
field.
After this fix, the user can navigate between fields monerary with TAB
When the focus is on a kanban card that do not have
oe_kanban_global_click or oe_kanban_global_click_edit when hitting the
ENTER key,
before this fix, the default action was to open the record of the card
after this fix, the action executed will be the action of the first
button or link of the card
if the card has the oe_kanban_global_click or
oe_kanban_global_click_edit class, the record still opens with ENTER key
Have a One2Many
The views of that o2m define two inline views: the list and the form
in the list view, put a field that isn't in the form and used in a domain
Try to add an item to the list
The form pops up
Fill in the data and save & close
Before this commit:
It crashed when evaluating the domain on a field using the field that is not in the form
After this commit:
Subviews share their fields in a special object on the parent record
In our case, the form view checks in that shared resource if the fields it is supposed to initialize
are there.
Hence, this flow doesn't crash anymore
OPW 1837511
closes#24350
The way the calendar view selected its form view was broken for two
reasons:
- any value given in the form_view_id attribute was kept as string,
which means that the string value would be sent to the server, and
this is not good.
- if no value was set, the calendar view then simply did a do_action
with the form view id set to false, which means that the default form
view is used. This is mostly ok, except when we are in the context of
an action with a form view which is not the default one. In that
case, we clearly prefer the form view from the action.
For example, before this commit, the form view in the timesheet
application (community) is not the same as the default form view on
account.analytic.line.
Note that this commit also adds a small tweak to the mock server to
better simulate errors like the web client does (in session.js).
Having boolean checkbox in an editable list
Before this commit, the checkbox was disabled, thus not clickable
The user, who probably expects to click on it to tick/untick
was thus misled, and needed to click *outside* the checkbox in order to activate the row
and only then tick the checkbox
After this commit, the behavior is as expected from the editable list point of view
clicking anywhere in the row (inlcuding on the checkbox itself) activates it into editable mode
OPW 1836067
closes#24292
Here is the story of the problem: back in 10.0, everything *seemed*
fine with button rendering except it was very messy duplicated codes.
The system was still not consistent:
-> In Header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-default btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-default btn-link
oe_link -> btn-default oe_link
btn-danger -> btn-default btn-danger
some_class -> btn-default some_class
-> Not in header, button with:
no class -> no class
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> oe_link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class
So, outside the header, the system seemed to not process anything except
transforming the oe_highlight class. In the header, the btn-default was
always added, except if using the oe_highlight class. The style is fine
for those, except for .btn-default.btn-link and .btn-default.oe_link
where the link class has no effect (which is fine as header are not
supposed to contain links).
In 11.0, the new views were introduced alongside websitepocalypse. The
new system led to:
-> In Header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-default btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-default oe_highlight
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-default btn-link
oe_link -> btn-default oe_link
btn-danger -> btn-default btn-danger
some_class -> btn-default some_class
-> Not in header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> oe_highlight
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> oe_link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class
So, it worsened the header buttons by not processing the oe_highlight
class and adding the btn-default class in all cases. This is even
worse since in 11.0 .btn-default.btn-link do have a specific style and
thus not appear as .btn-default anymore. Those may be invisible "bugs"
though as .btn-link are not supposed to be in header and oe_highlight
is styled correctly in css. For buttons outside the header, a little
processing was added to add "btn-default" class for buttons which did
not specify a class (and oe_highlight is not processed anymore there
too).
In master, with the less2scss task, the system had to change again but
led this time to visible bugs:
-> In Header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> btn-link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class
-> Not in header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> btn-link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class
As you can see, the system is now the same for both header button and
normal buttons. The system is also better for all cases as it produce
only *one* *bootstrap* class for all cases. However, the problematic
case is the last one for header buttons: it did not receive the
btn-default class automatically. Even though this is the API for the
rest of odoo (dialogs, renderButton (old WidgetButton), ...), this is
a problem here as fixing this would require to add the 'btn-default'
class in every view which is using this case.
While waiting for a better solution, this commit is instead forcing
the btn-default class in that header case only (so only when a class
was mentioned but it did not contain any bootstrap btn type class).
So the new system gives:
-> In Header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> btn-link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> btn-default some_class
-> Not in header, button with:
no class -> btn-default
btn-primary -> btn-primary
oe_highlight -> btn-primary
btn-default -> btn-default
btn-link -> btn-link
oe_link -> btn-link
btn-danger -> btn-danger
some_class -> some_class
This commit also adds tests which will prevent the system to change
again without noticing it.
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/24443
- Create a binary field which takes some time for computation. For
example:
```
ding_dong = fields.Binary(compute='_compute_ding_dong')
def _compute_ding_dong(self):
if not self.env.context.get('bin_size'):
while True:
3*3
for x in self:
x.ding_dong = x.product_id.image_medium
```
- Run the server with a limited CPU time, for example:
`--workers=2 --limit-time-cpu=10`
- Download the file
A JS traceback occurs, without any information about the real crash.
The error management is simply not working: `JSON.parse` is called on a
string which is not JSON-parseable.
opw-1838832
The cover image top and bottom margins should be the same on a kanban record.
The bottom margin on `o_attachment_image` has thus been removed as it is already
defined on `o_kanban_record_body` class, which makes a double bottom margin.
Task 54019
Here is an interesting scenario, involving the reconciliation tour again
(because it is our only tour that does async stuff before changing url):
- web client starts normally
- tour reconciliation starts, perform an rpc to find some id
- web client fetches users default action, it is empty, so clicks on
first menu item to load initial action, which is discuss. this will
make the web client load the action with datamanager (it should be the
action manager's job!).
- reconciliation tour rpc completes, it changes the url, this will do a
do_action
- the load_action rpc from the web client completes, it will then
perform a do_action, which will drop the action initiated by the tour
- tour fails.
The issue here is that the on_menu_action method from the web client is
not really safe, from a concurrency point of view: it performs some
asynchronous work, and then unilateraly decides to do a doAction. With
this commit, we simply add the do_action request to the action manager,
which uses internally a "dropprevious" system. This means that it will
always use the last action, just as expected.
Here is an interesting scenario, involving the reconciliation tour again
(because it is our only tour that does async stuff before changing url):
- web client starts normally
- tour reconciliation starts, perform an rpc to find some id
- web client fetches users default action, it is empty, so clicks on
first menu item to load initial action, which is discuss. this will
make the web client load the action with datamanager (it should be the
action manager's job!).
- reconciliation tour rpc completes, it changes the url, this will do a
do_action
- the load_action rpc from the web client completes, it will then
perform a do_action, which will drop the action initiated by the tour
- tour fails.
The issue here is that the on_menu_action method from the web client is
not really safe, from a concurrency point of view: it performs some
asynchronous work, and then unilateraly decides to do a doAction. With
this commit, we simply add the do_action request to the action manager,
which uses internally a "dropprevious" system. This means that it will
always use the last action, just as expected.
Here is an interesting scenario, involving the reconciliation tour again
(because it is our only tour that does async stuff before changing url):
- web client starts normally
- tour reconciliation starts, perform an rpc to find some id
- web client fetches users default action, it is empty, so clicks on
first menu item to load initial action, which is discuss. this will
make the web client load the action with datamanager (it should be the
action manager's job!).
- reconciliation tour rpc completes, it changes the url, this will do a
do_action
- the load_action rpc from the web client completes, it will then
perform a do_action, which will drop the action initiated by the tour
- tour fails.
The issue here is that the on_menu_action method from the web client is
not really safe, from a concurrency point of view: it performs some
asynchronous work, and then unilateraly decides to do a doAction. With
this commit, we simply add the do_action request to the action manager,
which uses internally a "dropprevious" system. This means that it will
always use the last action, just as expected.
When in Python 3, then function `open` defaults to open the file in text mode
with and the encoding (if not passed) is taken from
`locale.getpreferredencoding`.
Using `getpreferredencoding` is not necessarily a good practice. Because
files might no be encoded that way.
When testing Odoo not in runbot (which has LANG set to C.UTF-8) you may get:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/gitlab-runner/src/odoo11/addons/web/tests/test_js.py", line 24, in test_check_suite
self._check_only_call('web.qunit_suite')
File "/home/gitlab-runner/src/odoo11/addons/web/tests/test_js.py", line 37, in _check_only_call
if RE_ONLY.search(fp.read()):
File "/home/gitlab-runner/virtualenvs/odoo11-MlnlRiTaP2/lib/python3.5/encodings/ascii.py", line 26, in decode
return codecs.ascii_decode(input, self.errors)[0]
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 4757: ordinal not in range(128)
The proposed solution is to read the file in binary mode, and decode to
unicode/str ourselves using utf-8. We don't use the encoding argument of
`open`, so that the code works in both Python 3 and Python 2.
PR #24434
Before this, the progressbar values were not updated (both count and progress)
after archiving all the records of a column.
Multiple things have been done here to update it.
Firstly, a optimization had been done to avoid reloading the progressbar when
updating a column ; this optimization was not correct due to this precise use
case. This will update the progressbar.
Secondly, the `aggregateValues` are reset when putting empty groups back in the
datapoint. This attribute is used to compute the counter if a `sum_field` is set
on the progressbar widget. It needs to be reset because the loop that computes
it won't iterate on empty groups.
Eventually, the mockRPC of the progressbar route was not taking the `group_by`
argument into account (probably a typo).
... by setting it 'btn-default', because users hesitate between
that button, and those in the control panel.
Task 32950
Co-authored-by: dbh <dbh@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: aab-odoo <aab@odoo.com>
Rev. 374af56 changed the way 'button' nodes are rendered in basic
views (form, list, kanban). As a consequence, their 'name'
attribute wasn't transmitted to the produced html elements anymore.
However, this attribute is very convenient to debug views, and to
write selectors in tests. For instance, it broke the test added by
rev. 8d17a2a once forwardported in master.
This commit reverts 1ce5bea.
This feature has been removed in rev. odoo/odoo@e533085 but this commit
reintroduces it. It was considered as "too dangerous" for new users.
Instead of removing the feature, a confirmation request has been added to warn
the user about his potentially harmful action.
The same warning has also been added in List view when archiving records.
Task 60393
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
when navigating with the keyboard, using the ALT key is the trigger
for most of the access keys. In Firefox on Linux, this prevents a number
of existing shortcuts (like ALT+Left arrow for browser back).
This fix allows browsers to execute those shortcuts.
Note: in Firefox on linux ALT+F E V S B T H are assigned to menus and
cannot be stopped, removing the keypress handler does not change
anything.
Christophe Simonis