* The compiled templates are cached per user, lang, inherit context values
* ir.ui.fields: attributes method return an dict, and record_to_html return only the content value of the field
* all rendered text use build_text and all attributes use build_attribute
* t-esc-options is removed and replace by format_value method
* AssetsBundle receive the list files and remains
session_instance.js moved from framework/ to services/ and renamed into
session.js, which required to change the bundles in report and web_editor
addons.
PURPOSE
=======
I've seen this new improvement regarding the naming of the printed reports:
https://www.odoo.com/web?#id=10870&view_type=form&model=project.task&menu_id=3942&action=327
This makes the report have the pdf name being the name instead of the report_name of
the ir.actions.report.xml, which is already an improvement.
But why don't we allow the users to have their own naming conventions?
I mean, we could allow our client to create and name their pdf the way they want, as
they do regarding the attachment.
Not only when it's about saving it as an attachment on the record, but also when downloading
directly the pdf, such that the modification in the previous screenshot, would give the following
result when downloaded:
People need to have their pdf named automatically according to a convention. When you print 10 sales
order during an hour, you don't want to get lost in having the following:
Devis / Commande.pdf
Devis / Commande(1).pdf
Devis / Commande(2).pdf
Devis / Commande(3).pdf
Devis / Commande(4).pdf
Devis / Commande(5).pdf
Devis / Commande(6).pdf
Devis / Commande(7).pdf
especially when those are for different partners.
If a custom report's render_html raises a KeyError for some
reason, Report.get_html would swallow the exception and fallback
on generic HTML rendering, usually blowing up with unfathomable
errors of missing rendering context data.
Check if a custom report object exists instead of waiting for a
KeyError.
/!\ This commit must not be forward-ported on saas-10 (the file that
is modified here does not exist anymore anyway).
Since the website/web_editor split, the mt/mb definitions were not
included in reports anymore. Those were not the only rules that
were forgotten.
As it would be tricky to add the whole files where those rules are
defined now in the assets of stables branches, this commit only
restores the missing css rules by adding them in the report.css file.
Note: after the assets refactoring that has been done in saas-10, this
problem will no longer appear.
Since the website/web_editor split, the mt/mb definitions were not
included in reports anymore. Those were not the only rules that
were forgotten. In 9.0, as a fix, those rules were added back in the
report.css file.
As the assets have been refactored in saas-10, the fix here is to
link the missing file (unique in saas-10) in the report assets.
Christophe Matthieu