Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
[FIX] account: move some ir.model.access to sale module
[FIX] payment: Move some ir.rule to website_sale
[FIX] stock: move some ir.model.access rule to sale_stock
[FIX] project: Move some ir.model.access rules to crm_project_issue
[FIX] mrp: Move some ir.model.access rules to sale_mrp
[FIX] calendar: move some ir.model.access rules to crm
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
[ADD] sales_team: See own documents => See only his sales team
Moved the "User: Own Leads Only", "User: All Leads" and "Manager" groups from sale and crm
into sales_team module. Add the record rules so that user can see only his Own Sales Team
if "See Own Leads" is sales right and can see all sales teams if he is having sales rights
of "See All Leads" or manager.
This branch need more testing instead of doing 10 fixes. A lot of issues are occuring
when installing modules in different orders.
This reverts commit fa6e415cdb.
Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
The issue occurs in the following case:
- Configure 2 product categories A and B such as A is the parent of B
- Create a pricelist
- Create a first pricelist item which applies to category A
- Create a second pricelist item which applies to category B (with the
same configuration regarding the minimum quantity)
- Create a product for category B
Before this fix, we cannot ensure that the pricelist item related to
category B will be applied, since we do not order the pricelist items by
category.
Thanks to this fix, we make sure to select the category from the more
specific to the less specific.
opw-678633
product,point_of_sale: Add a widget handle on the sequence, to be able to order the products
easily for the ecommerce for example. (Move it from the PoS module to the
product module)
Printing the product label is only available on the variants.
It should be available on the product template too as you may not work
with them.
We took the opportunity to refactor the label report too.
This reverts commit b0f02e31b2.
As pointed out by @nim-odoo [1], a similar patch has already been
uncommited few month ago [2].
Ref #11988
opw-676422
[1] https://git.io/vrYxY
[2] see a6badd2559
Warehouse models are migrated to new API. No change is performed to code
structure or functional structure. Some code cleaning may be performed when
migrating to simplify the code. Other files may be updated due to the move
towards the new API.
Including
- unit tests for test/inventory.yml
- unit tests for test/move.yml
- unit tests for test/shipment.yml
- integration of test_reuspply.py
- integration of test_owner_available into test_product.py
New tests are temporarily deactivated. Indeed they rely on onchange methods
that will change during migration. Tests will be reactivated after migration
and updated.
With the pricelist, it is possible to define a pricelist just for
a variant. But in the product.product.form, only the pricelist items
linked to the product template could be displayed.
The field item_ids has been created in product.product model to display
all the pricelist applied on a product.
opw:674700