As the journal is mostly set in the Odoo world the _default_journal
method is not needed during create, but in case you only have
partner_id, account_id and type in vals you will have retrieved a wrong
journal in case you have an incoming invoice.
closesodoo/odoo#28635
When analysing the code thanks to Pyflame it cames that the 'prefetch_fields()'
function was runing most of the time. In order to improve the global performance,
I change the context of the move_lines : 'prefetch_fields = False'. It permit to reduce the
time of computation of the prefetch_fields and to avoid the MemoryError.
N.B.: The database of the customer (on saas) contains 1.3 millions of entry and to reproduce the issue
I have to set the HardMemlimit to 0.9 Go and the SoftMemLimit to 0.5Go.
OPW-1910422
closesodoo/odoo#29231
In case there is a large amount of data to display, the 'Manual
Reconciliation' widget suffers from high CPU consumption, and therefore
slowness.
This is mainly due to the line rendering (function `_renderLines`).
Indeed, unlike the 'Bank Statement Reconciliation' widget which
retrieves the data partially, the 'Manual Reconciliation' widget
retrieves and renders all the data. No offset is implemented in this
case, neither for data retrieval nor rendering.
With this commit, we implement a partial rendering of the data
retrieved. This means that all data are fetched when loading the widget,
but only a part of it is rendered. We make use of the existing 'Load
More' mechanism to display more data. By default, 30 accounts or
partners are loaded.
By combining this with PR #28958, we aim to make the widget more usable
for large data volumes.
opw-1903575
closesodoo/odoo#28959
Create a "Cash Rounding Method" C with
Rounding Precision: 0.05,
Rounding Strategy: Modify tax amount,
Rounding Method: DOWN.
Create an invoice I with rounding of currency C, with some tax line and nonzero
rounding.
When you now print the invoice, the tax amount is not the same,
as it shows the field "amount" instead of "amount_total".
Fix courtesy of Olivier Jossen, Braintec
opw 1909215
closesodoo/odoo#29079
This commit tackles the issue of having the pseudo-object 'parent' in the
invoice lines views
In the regular o2m, parent refers to the current invoice
From commit eca030cc38
we learn that parent.get() is not a valid field according to python
From OPW 1912243, we learn that:
- when the invoice line form view is standalone (not popped from the o2m)
'parent' is not what we expect (in this case it will refer to the record list of all invoice lines, NOT the invoice)
- parent.type in that case is undefined and makes the JS crash
So, to make sure we retrieve the right field and value, we retrieve them through
related fields pointing to the invoice
closesodoo/odoo#29074
When opening the Manual Reconciliation widget, all partners with opened
invoices and payments are fetched.
In some cases, the database might contain a lot of partners without any
reconciliation suggestion; therefore, the partners with suggestions are
'lost' in the view.
This commit sorts the data: we first display the parters with a
suggestion, then the others. This should improve the usability of the
view.
opw-1903575
closesodoo/odoo#28958
Create an invoice for a day, and register a payment right away
BUT choose a date in the future for that payment
Imagine a French Check. You write it, and tell your partner to cash it in
10 days later
You would enter that transaction as a temporary payment
in your own books
OPW 1893646
Before this commit, the line of the partner did not appear in the aged
report after if the report was for the date just after the invoice date
After this commit, it does
closesodoo/odoo#28728
Have a company that do not have a logo.
Try to print a "PDF report" from the accounting module
Before this commit, the simple company form popped up
with the purpose of force setting a company logo
After this commit, we assume it is not necessary to have a company logo on the reports
Note, because of 733ce266ef, we cannot do a save and print
OPW 1904764
closesodoo/odoo#28617
The `context.company_ids` variable seems mostly empty in the case of the
Manual Reconciliation widget. Therefore, we fetch the current company of
the user in the session.
Complement of e5c8071484Fixes#28270
opw-1904475
closesodoo/odoo#28541
This code is called by account_reports to build the Aged Receivable/Payable.
However, no support for the multi-company/multi-currency is there and then,
the multi-company filter on account_reports never worked.
Before that, when reversing an account.move, if two lines of the move shared the same account, we tried reconciling them once for each line: it worked the first time but triggered an error message the second, since the lines had already been reconciled.
Before that, taxes were only applied with the most recent currency rate, which caused problems in multi currencies, when reconciling statement lines made in the past with invoices, causing the amount currencies in the payment account.move to be wrong.
//Scenario to reproduce the issue (from customer ticket 1903497):
(for a company with USD as base currency)
1. Create a new bank journal for EUR payments
2. Create a new customer invoice for 90€
3. Create a new tax for the reconciliation model, price-included and amounting to 15%
4. Create a new reconciliation model using this tax
5. Use the currency rates from the demo data, add one that is closer to current date than the most recent one.
6. Create a new bank statement for the created EUR bank journal. Make sure that the transaction is less than the actual amount due on the invoice so that we can apply the reconciliation model. Also make sure to set a date on the transaction that lies in the past at some point when the currency rate was (significantly) different.
7. Hit the reconcile button, select the amount due from the invoice and apply the discount reconciliation model(take note of the amount on the created tax move line). Now reconcile.
What is the current behavior that you observe?
Now go back to the bank statement and check the created journal entries. You will see a difference in the amount currency values of the payment and the tax account move line. This difference should not exist.
When loading the Reconciliation Widget, all reconciliation models are
retrieved. This is not correct: only the one matching the company and
the journal should be retrieved.
Fixes#28270
opw-1904475
closesodoo/odoo#28474
Until v12, doing this is wrong. The currency_id field of account.journal should only be used if the journal is in a different currency. Otherwise, this field should stay empty.
//NOTE FOR FORWARD-PORT: this commit should not be ported to 12.0 and further.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a credit note for an amount of 100$
- Validate it and register a payment
- Let's pay an amount of 90$ and mark this credit note as fully paid
Bug:
An error message was raised saying: Wrong credit or debit value in accounting entry !
DO NOT FORWARD-PORT
opw:1893570
closesodoo/odoo#28433
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a credit note for an amount of 100$
- Validate it and register a payment
- Let's pay an amount of 90$ and mark this credit note as fully paid
Bug:
An error message was raised saying: Wrong credit or debit value in accounting entry !
The field residual_company_signed must be positive for out_invoice and in_refund and
negative for in_invoice and out_refund. In this way, the correct writeoff amount
can be computed in function _create_payment_entry.
PS: In function _compute_payment_amount, the field residual_signed and residual_company_signed
are already signed, that's why it was wrong to multiply a second time on it with MAP_INVOICE_TYPE_PAYMENT_SIGN
opw:1893570
closesodoo/odoo#28148
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a customer invoice I with an amount of 100$ and validate it
- Register three payments P1 at 11/10, P2 at 12/10 and P3 at 13/10
- Click on button "Print" and the report displays the payments in the right order
P3, P2, P1
- Click on button "Send by email" and click on the attachment with the report
Bug:
The report didn't display the payments in the same order, it displayed P1, P2, P3
opw:1888251
closesodoo/odoo#27895
Before this commit, when accessing journals through the menu item
Bank Account, one was able to enter an partner.bank account number
But, in case the partner.bank already exsited, there was no way to select it
and a cryptic unicity constraint was raised
After this commit, one can select an account already existing
OPW 1884515
closesodoo/odoo#27840
Multicurrency is ON
Your company in USD
Make a bank journal in EUR
Create a statement and push reconcile
In the widget, create a line with a tax and hit reconcile
Before this commit, the amount_currency field of the tax move line was not filled
After this commit it is
OPW 1885014
closesodoo/odoo#27592
Let's consider an aged partner balance with a period of 30 days as of
2019-02-08. The specific dates used in the report are:
``` python
bisou = datetime.strptime('2019-02-08', "%Y-%m-%d").date()
for x in [0, 1, 30, 31, 60, 61, 90, 91, 120, 121]:
print(x, bisou + relativedelta(days=-x))
0 2019-02-08
1 2019-02-07
30 2019-01-09
31 2019-01-08
60 2018-12-10
61 2018-12-09
90 2018-11-10
91 2018-11-09
120 2018-10-11
121 2018-10-10
```
However, the current periods generated are incorrect:
```
{'name': '0-30', 'stop': '2019-02-08', 'start': '2019-01-09'}
{'name': '30-60', 'stop': '2019-01-08', 'start': '2018-12-09'}
{'name': '60-90', 'stop': '2018-12-08', 'start': '2018-11-08'}
{'name': '90-120', 'stop': '2018-11-07', 'start': '2018-10-08'}
{'name': '+120', 'stop': '2018-10-07', 'start': False}
```
There is a clear inconsistency between the name of the period and the
date used. Moreover, the name is misleading: 0-30 includes the -0 date,
while 30-60 doesn't include the -30 date.
After the fix, the name and the periods are consistent. We also change
the first period to 1-30 since including 0 would mean to include amounts
which are not due yet.
```
{'name': '1-30', 'stop': '2019-02-07', 'start': '2019-01-09'}
{'name': '31-60', 'stop': '2019-01-08', 'start': '2018-12-10'}
{'name': '61-90', 'stop': '2018-12-09', 'start': '2018-11-10'}
{'name': '91-120', 'stop': '2018-11-09', 'start': '2018-10-11'}
{'name': '+120', 'stop': '2018-10-10', 'start': False}
```
opw-1886633
closesodoo/odoo#27294