This commit refactors mail.thread message_subscribe method. It is done for two
purposes. First one is to optimize performance by using the new followers
computation methods introduced recently. Second purpose is to clean the API
of message_subscribe to make it simpler to use.
This commit splits message_subscribe in two main parts :
* _message_subscribe is a private method calling the follower new
subscription methods and updating the record set;
* message_subscribe is a public wrapper on _message_subscribe that adds
access rights checks;
Simplification comes by removing message_subscribe_users that was a
shortcut to message_subscribe. Having a method to subscribe partners and
channels is sufficient as we would like to avoid bloating the public API
of mail.thread. A force parameter is also removed from message_subscribe
as this implementation detail can be induced in the computation.
Various addons using the removed methods are updated in order to use the new
subscription API. They have the same functional behavior.
This commit has a great impact when subscribing several followers. In a more
general way all code using message_post is also optimized as posting a message
generally implies subscribing followers. It also improves activity use as
posting a message and subscribing new followers are common process in
activities.
The regional variations are not published on Transifex and hsould be translated
manually.
The translations are mainly from previous versions or contains buggy fuzzy
translations (not matching the real source string).
Clean based on the .pot and delete the empty files
Fixes#21733
Purpose
=======
The attribute name isn't required on the <filter> tag. If not set, it can't be selected with a xpath and it can't be overwritten.
A lot of PR are coming from the community just to add a name on a filter because:
- It can't be selected with a xpath.
- It can't be used with `default_search_foo` on an action context.
Specification
=============
Make the atttribute name required
The fields `owner_user_id` used `maintenance` search view to filter on
assigned equipment is overwritten in `hr_maintenance` to be computed
based on employee or department manager linked user.
However employee may not have linked user, considering equipment
unassigned.
Use directly the presence of employee or department to
determine if an equipment is assigned or not.
In maintenance.equipment form view, the field owner_user_id has been replaced
by equipment_assign_to, employee_id and department_id. But in the kanban view,
this field was still displayed even though the image was replaced by the image
of the employee. So now, the kanban view follows the same behavior as the form view.
opw:724378
Christophe Simonis