This commit fixes two problems:
* Clicking on the save button of a web_editor dialog closed the dialog
two times because the button was created with the flag "close: true"
and binded to a handler which closes the dialog. This also prevented
to extend this handler by placing the this._super call in a deferred.
* Some web_editor dialog extended the save callback but forgot to use
the this._super, which prevents the "saved" event to be triggered
(currently not used anywhere but useful for custo and master).
Commit 89a4774c21 changed the kwargs
debug value of the FieldTextHtml controller to let it be equal to
"assets" instead of True or False. The problem is that an empty string
was considered True before the commit and False afterwards.
In fact, the original code was wrong and the debug value should equal
the already processed kwargs debug value in the HttpRequest object.
Indeed, the kwargs.debug value is equal to the URL value while the
request.debug value is already processed and is only one of the 3
values: None, True or "assets".
Commit 57c09e8a8e was supposed to fix the problem but only made it
worse in some cases. Since the new option parenting system, the
customize button visibility should not be determined on creation as
parent and own options are appended on snippet focus. Also, removing
the dropdown header if it was alone was a bad idea as this is it which
contains the information of options and all the options have not
necessarily a <li/> tag in the dropdown.
For example, the many2one option has no <li/> in the dropdown and is
the only option of the field snippet. So with the previous commit, the
dropdown header was removed as there is no <li/> in the dropdown other
than this header. So as the header was removed, on snippet focus, there
was no way to determine the many2one option exists, so its on_focus
method was not called.
Now, the dropdown-header is always kept. The visibility of customize
button is determine on snippet focus.
Before commit a8ee18e172, the paragraph alignment dropdown menu was
too large for its content, so it was ugly. After that commit, it became
too small for its content, which is even more ugly.
This fix sets the width of this specific dropdown so that its content
fills exactly in (as with original summernote).
This test is ran in the backend and, if we do not mark it as post
install, the dependencies of the web module are not installed.
The webclient will then errors like "View type 'kanban' is not present
in the view registry".
The many2one fields and their search bar were not working anymore since
the loss of some functionnalities with commit b309f3ab54.
* The dropdown which regroups a snippet options list is hidden if it
does not contain any option. This was not the case anymore because it
now always contains a dropdown title. This is fixed by simply removing
this title if it is alone in the dropdown.
* Snippet options attached to an element whose parent is not editable
cannot be moved/deleted/duplicated as it is supposed to remain where
it is. This is often the case for many2one fields and the feature was
simply lost in the refactoring.
The editor bar is sometimes filled with too many options, and these
hide the save and discard buttons on small screens. To solve the
problem, the description option (which take a lot of space) has now
a max-width and the save and discard buttons are always on top.
The less refactoring in 5b65befcd8
wrongly removed the css directive that hide some elements in edit mode.
As a side effect, the product price was appearing twice when editing a
product. Commit 44ca4317a9 tempt to fix
it but removed the edition part.
opw:683343
Prevent the padding of editor .btn's to change when a theme modifies
them (by mistake or not).
Once again, this is a problem of css isolation between the editor and
the website customization. A theme cannot safely, at this time, do
"#wrapwrap .btn" to isolate its rules because it may override some
bootstrap rules like ".btn-group .btn" which would became less
important. It cannot changes the bootstrap variables either as it is
still used by the odoo ui in some places.
There is no safe good solution to "share" bootstrap theming between
odoo ui and website ui. The safest solution is to force the design
of odoo ui elements that may be overridden by themes (in the end,
it's the same as progressively removing bootstrap from odoo ui).
The editor allows using background image options on snippets which
use a background-image. For this to work, the oe_img_bg css class
has to be on this snippet. The problem is that the class is absent
when using some themes as the select_class method removes it to place
its own value.
Now, the oe_img_bg class is (re)added when a select_class method is
used within the background image option.
The code for page creation from menu edition dialog was there but
invisible to the user because of a wrong qweb template inheritance.
Indeed, the edit menu dialog relies on an extension of the link dialog
template. But this one is extended in-place in another location and
that extension is not considered when the second extension is made
because a t-extend always use the base template. The only solution to
achieve the same result is to copy the edit menu dialog qweb extension
in Javascript.
Note: the feature was still available from the link dialog in page
edition though because this was not concerned by the wrong qweb
extension.
However, adding a page by this way would create multiple pages because
one was created each time a page name was entered (and not only on
save !). So typing "test", then changing its mind and typing "hello",
then rechanging to "test", then hitting the save button created the
"test, "test-1", "test-2" and "hello" pages.
This fix takes advantage of an already present parameter which can
determine if a new page should be created or not. However, a code
refactoring should be done in master for these classes.
* Move description button at the end of the toolbar
* Add an "auto" state button for the image width (alongside 100%,
50% and 25%) (when these last three are unchecked, the auto button
becomes checked).
Now, when choosing a background-color when a background-image has
already been selected, the background image is removed on hover/click
of the color option.
However, the opposite operation remains the same. So if you choose a
background-color, you can then choose a background-image and the
colors will be kept.
The `check_access_rule` call allow to remove the `editable` key from the
rendering context (which will lead to the display of the editor bar) if
an access rule prevents the edition of the ir.ui.view record. Also remove
it in case the user has no write access on the model (i.e. demo user).
Refactor snippet structure
* new "cover" snippet
* move the title out of col-md-12
* delete snippets (s_quote_slider)
* rename snippets (FAQ Roller -> Accordion)
* ...
Refactor the way the background images are handled so that themes
can customize the defaults ones easily without ugly xpath or ugly
css.
Christophe Simonis