There is a hackish feature in the web_editor which forces the
contenteditable to true on links which are clicked and removes it
anywhere else in the page so that only the link is editable after
click. This allows to add text at the end of a link without adding it
outside of the link by mistake.
The feature was badly implemented because, if the link was editable
without having any parent which is editable, the contenteditable was
forced to true, then immediatly forced to false when forcing to false
every page element. This was the case for lots of t-field. By example
the product categories in eCommerce are t-field links which are in non
editable <li/> elements...
The system was lost with the editor refactoring which came with saas-10
and commit bf39884a5c.
Indeed the show() method of the BuildingBlock class was removed as the
widget is now always showed but the show_blocks() method it called was
not removed (and thus was not called anymore).
As a fix, the show_blocks method is now called again, on snippets
initializations and each time a snippet is dropped or removed.
The .dropdown is in a .btn-group environment while a .btn-group can
only contain .btn or .btn-group elements.
This induced problems where the m2o options covers the full overlay
environment, preventing clicks on the customize dropdown.
The snippet options can define an on_remove method which was supposed
to be called when the snippet is removed. This was not the case since
the method was written so that the options were removed before the
on_remove method was called... (Un)fortunately, the on_remove callbacks
were not doing any critical job in current implementation. In saas-13
however, some elements will rely on this.
Before this commit, the focus point the user can move on the image in
the background position configuration dialog was only following the
mouse as we want if the image original width was larger than the dialog
one. This is because the javascript relies on the fact the image takes
100% width of its container. To fix this, the container now does not
take 100% of modal width but the size of its internal image (with a
max-width of 100%).
The call to the web_editor is made through an iframe with some get
parameters. While not really a problem in itself, this has the
disadvantage of generating long URIs. In some case, since all the
fields in the views are included as a GET parameter, URIs can be
generated that go up to several thousand characters. Most servers will
return a 414 for such URIs, preventing the edition of the mail
template in the view.
To avoid this problem, this commit extends the 'html_frame' widget and
blacklist 2 fields that can get too long once encoded.
Ideally, it would probably be better to stop sending all the fields and
simply add the *needed* fields one by one, but since it's difficult to
know exactly what fields might be needed and this is stable, I'm gonna
go with this 'workaround' but conservative fix.
opw-685646
Commit 89a4774c21 changed the kwargs
debug value of the FieldTextHtml controller to let it be equal to
"assets" instead of True or False. The problem is that an empty string
was considered True before the commit and False afterwards.
In fact, the original code was wrong and the debug value should equal
the already processed kwargs debug value in the HttpRequest object.
Indeed, the kwargs.debug value is equal to the URL value while the
request.debug value is already processed and is only one of the 3
values: None, True or "assets".
Before commit a8ee18e172, the paragraph alignment dropdown menu was
too large for its content, so it was ugly. After that commit, it became
too small for its content, which is even more ugly.
This fix sets the width of this specific dropdown so that its content
fills exactly in (as with original summernote).
This test is ran in the backend and, if we do not mark it as post
install, the dependencies of the web module are not installed.
The webclient will then errors like "View type 'kanban' is not present
in the view registry".
The editor bar is sometimes filled with too many options, and these
hide the save and discard buttons on small screens. To solve the
problem, the description option (which take a lot of space) has now
a max-width and the save and discard buttons are always on top.
The less refactoring in 5b65befcd8
wrongly removed the css directive that hide some elements in edit mode.
As a side effect, the product price was appearing twice when editing a
product. Commit 44ca4317a9 tempt to fix
it but removed the edition part.
opw:683343
Prevent the padding of editor .btn's to change when a theme modifies
them (by mistake or not).
Once again, this is a problem of css isolation between the editor and
the website customization. A theme cannot safely, at this time, do
"#wrapwrap .btn" to isolate its rules because it may override some
bootstrap rules like ".btn-group .btn" which would became less
important. It cannot changes the bootstrap variables either as it is
still used by the odoo ui in some places.
There is no safe good solution to "share" bootstrap theming between
odoo ui and website ui. The safest solution is to force the design
of odoo ui elements that may be overridden by themes (in the end,
it's the same as progressively removing bootstrap from odoo ui).
The editor allows using background image options on snippets which
use a background-image. For this to work, the oe_img_bg css class
has to be on this snippet. The problem is that the class is absent
when using some themes as the select_class method removes it to place
its own value.
Now, the oe_img_bg class is (re)added when a select_class method is
used within the background image option.
The code for page creation from menu edition dialog was there but
invisible to the user because of a wrong qweb template inheritance.
Indeed, the edit menu dialog relies on an extension of the link dialog
template. But this one is extended in-place in another location and
that extension is not considered when the second extension is made
because a t-extend always use the base template. The only solution to
achieve the same result is to copy the edit menu dialog qweb extension
in Javascript.
Note: the feature was still available from the link dialog in page
edition though because this was not concerned by the wrong qweb
extension.
However, adding a page by this way would create multiple pages because
one was created each time a page name was entered (and not only on
save !). So typing "test", then changing its mind and typing "hello",
then rechanging to "test", then hitting the save button created the
"test, "test-1", "test-2" and "hello" pages.
This fix takes advantage of an already present parameter which can
determine if a new page should be created or not. However, a code
refactoring should be done in master for these classes.
Christophe Simonis