Historically, it was possible to import addons via a naked import. It is
no more possible since 9e1f13bac, since that commit, the only possible
way to import odoo addons is via the `import odoo.addons' prefix.
closesodoo/odoo#46995
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Create an event with at least one attendee.
Synchronize the event between Odoo and Google.
Add/Remove an attendee in Google.
Observed behavior
-----------------
After synchronisation, the partner is not added/removed in Odoo
Expected behavior
-----------------
The partner should be added/removed
Task 2241572
To change your Google Calendar account, the authentication tokens must be set to `False`.
But doing so leaves synchronized events in the database.
This commit adds a wizard to handle those existing events as the user wants.
Task 2126717
PR #42031
PR Enterprise odoo/enterprise#8006
This commit refactors calendar synchronization between Odoo and Google after the
main calendar application refactoring.
This refactoring takes advantage of two new features from the Google API:
- New way of synchronizing resources efficiently[1]
Incremental sync is performed repeatedly and updates Odoo with all the changes that
happened ever since the previous sync. Each time, Odoo provides the previous sync
token it obtained from Google and stores the new sync token from the response.
- Event metadata[2]
Ability to set hidden key-value pairs with an event, called extended properties.
These extended properties are used to store the related odoo event id and the Odoo
owner id (see known limitations)
Known limitations
=================
- Let A and B be two new users (no tokens available). A creates an event in Odoo and
invites B. A is the owner of the event (user_id). Now B authenticates to his Google Calendar
account and synchronizes his calendar. We cannot send the event to A's calendar since we
don't have any access to his Google Calendar. Hence the event his sent to B's calendar.
This leads to data de-synchronisation: The owner is A in Odoo but B in Google.
The "real" owner (user A) is stored in the Google event's metadata to be able to
reconcile the owner for following synchronizations.
- Let A and B be two users of Odoo and Google Calendar. And let the Google Calendar of B
be private (e.g. if A creates an event in Google Calendar and invites B, B won't see the
event in his calendar). If A creates an event in Odoo and invites B. The event is synced
to Google Calendar of A. Now B can see the event in Odoo but he can't see it in his
Google Calendar.
Task 2126717
PR #42031
PR Enterprise odoo/enterprise#8006
[1] https://developers.google.com/calendar/v3/sync
[2] https://developers.google.com/calendar/extended-properties
The fields `start_datetime` and `stop_datetime` are the exact miror
of fields `start` and `stop` respectively.
The field `display_start` is never used.
Hence those fields are removed.
Task 2126717
PR #42031
PR Enterprise odoo/enterprise#8006
TL;DR A bit of magic and ... Pouf ... all virtual events are now real records.
Purpose
=======
The current implementation of recurring events uses "virtual events" to represents all
events in the recurrence. Only one event is stored in the database. All other events are
dynamically built and sent to the web client which sees them as real records.
This implementation is old, difficult to read (6 years of changes and bug fixes) and
has become more and more difficult to maintain.
A fresh start would be welcome.
Specification
=============
When creating a recurring event, a `calendar.recurrence.rule` record should be created.
This model holds the rrule configuration and is responsible to manage events that result
from the rrule.
When a new recurrence is created, all resulting events are also created (stored in the
database). No more virtual events.
To avoid an explosion of events, a maximum of 720 events is created. With 720 events,
a daily recurrence lasts for 2 years and a weekly recurrence lasts for 15 years.
This strategy is used by Google Calendar and seems acceptable in most cases.
A cron job could eventually be introduced to generated more events as the end comes.
This allows to introduce an new rrule end type: 'Forever'. This is actually a shortcut
to create a recurrence running for 720 events.
Inspired by Google Calendar, new possibilities are introduced when modifying a recurring
event (e.g. change the name, add an attendee):
- Modify only this particular event (the event is still part of the recurrence)
- Modify this and following events (events are still in the same recurrence)
- Modify all events
In a similar way, when updating the rrule of an event (e.g. from every Monday to every
Tuesday), the user can choose to:
- Modify this and following events: the recurrence is split. The first part remains
unchanged but now ends when the second recurrence begins. The second parts is the
updated rrule.
- Modify only this particular event.
- Modify all events: Forbidden (same as Google Calendar)
Note: when events are "moved" because the rrule changed, the events are not actually
moved. They are unlinked and new events are created (See "Some design choices explained"
section).
Some design choices explained
=============================
Where to store the rrule?
-------------------------
Two options were considered.
1) Store the rrule on an event, each event of the recurrence having a Many2one
to the parent_id, aka the Master Event of the recurrence.
2) Store the rrule on another model: `calendar.recurrence.rule`. Each event in the
recurrence having a Many2one to the recurrence record.
Both options have pros & cons. But there is no clear winner.
However the actual business logic of handling the recurrence creation/update
would be the same.
Where the rrule configuration is stored is the only main difference between both options.
And this is probably the easiest part of implementing recurring events.
With that in mind, option 2) is chosen. It allows to clearly separate recurrence
logic from the events themselves. It is also the "correct" way of modeling data to avoid
many empty columns for most records.
Reusing events on rrule update
------------------------------
When an rrule is modified, events should also be updated.
In most cases, current events are unlinked and new events are created from scratch.
Only events exactly at the same time before and after the rrule update are kept.
Trying to reuse other events would require an obscure and arbitrary heuristic.
(Imagine an rrule every Monday that is changed to every Tuesday and every Friday.
What would you do?).
This implies that any change to a specific event (name change, attendee added, chatter
messages) is lost. This tradeoff seems acceptable as updating an rrule should not be
that frequent. Moreover, Google Calendar also works that way so why not Odoo?
Reusing events on events shifts
-------------------------------
On the calendar view, drag and drop an event to shift the entire recurrence.
One way to handle the recurrence shift is to apply the same timedelta to all events.
Now events are correctly positioned... except for events that were specifically
moved. Those outliers needs special handling.
This also introduces some behavior inconsistencies:
when an rrule is directly modified, events are not reused, but when the rrule is
modified by drag & dropping an event, events are reused. This option needs more code to
handle the shift and the behaviors are not consistent.
The chosen option is to find the rrule configuration from the dragged event (this is
easy) and update the recurrence with those new rrule values. This brings us back to
an rrule update (see above): code reusability yeah; one behavior to rule them all yeah.
One downside is that outliers are lost (but Google Calendar also works that way).
Task 2126717
PR #42031
PR Enterprise odoo/enterprise#8006
Purpose
=======
The current kanban view is messy. It is difficult to identify which
apps are installed or not. The user can completely miss a module
that might have interested him. A search panel would make things way
more readable.
closesodoo/odoo#44401
Taskid: 2181557
Related: odoo/enterprise#8144
Related: odoo/upgrade#879
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
In a database with many users / events to synchronize, the cron
`ir_cron_sync_all_cals` may time out. Consequently, even if a `commit`
is performed for each user, some users are never synchronized.
In this commit, we first sort the users by last synchronization date,
meaning that all users will ultimately be synchronized, even if the cron
times out. On top of that, we introduce the context key
`last_sync_hours` to prevent the synchronization in case the cron is
restarted after timeout.
opw-2158372
closesodoo/odoo#45032
X-original-commit: 2f21def63c61324e2286dbee6abead091171a041
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Martinelli <nim@odoo.com>
Followup of a425695e
The terms were back in 12.0
Courtesy of Juan José Scarafía
closesodoo/odoo#41624
X-original-commit: 85d0c7001a997748d7691205bbb8d066597591a5
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Activate Google Synchronization, create on OE a recurrent event (no allday)
synchronize the calendar, then delete an event of the recursion on OE,
sync again on OE.
An error will popup in the console. There is a typo in the variable
sent to the google API.
https://developers.google.com/calendar/v3/reference/eventsclosesodoo/odoo#40625
X-original-commit: 299bb8a995fb8058bbc0b9e4d71b67d3e765c6af
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Activate Google Synchronization, create on OE a recurrent event,
synchronize the calendar, then delete an event of the recursion on GC,
sync again on OE.
The event will be deleted from GC but not from OE after sync.
This appens because of this "rewrite" rule
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/12.0/addons/calendar/models/calendar.py#L918
that occur on event creation from OE, altering the event parameters when
is marked "allday".
When an "allday" event is deleted from GC the unlink is triggered in OE with the
default time "00:00:00". During the creation of the exclusion '
_inverse_dates' will be called altering start and stop datetime but not
recurrent_id_date, so the new record will not match the event generating
the recursion and the exclusion will not occur. The problem require
particular carefulness because when a recurrent event is fetched from
google the '_inverse_dates' is not called, so in that case the default
time is fine.
opw-2060526
closesodoo/odoo#39662
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Activate Google Synchronization, create on GC a recurrent event,
synchronize OE, then delete an event of the recursion on GC, sync again
on OE.
The event will be deleted from GC but not from OE after sync.
The exclusion on OE is not correctly working in that particular case,
fixing require also to "suppress" the attendee to avoid that just
created exclusions would be detected as changes to send in a following
synchronization.
closesodoo/odoo#37884closesodoo/odoo#39510
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Create a lot of event (i.e. 300 via recursive events) with attedees. Sync.
Cancel all the events. Sync again. This and all subsequent
synchronization will take a lot of time to complete. The first time is
normal because odoo will cross-check every deleted event for the "syncing" user
with google to ensure that there is match between OE and GC.
This matching will sistematically fail because the json module cannot
serialize a datetime object, so it will be retriggered again and again
stalling the synchronization for minutes. Formatting the datetime before calling the
dump fixes. Moreover the api usage was wrong as 'originalStartTime' is
not a date but a complex object holding the date.
Note: this could have been avoided via logging but error detection was
suppressed.
opw-2052450
closesodoo/odoo#37335
X-original-commit: 951808b2434717d38ab9d562404eb74d8bd40634
Signed-off-by: agr-odoo <agr-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Slovenian language, as many others languages, is not present in the
beta/master projects in Transifex.
For some reason, Transiflex removed all current translations, this was
already fixed in 12, but as there are not automatic forward-port for
translations, this is a manual forward-port.
opw-2060055
closesodoo/odoo#36374
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
The following models are already using big images, or they might need big images
in the future:
- partner
- hr employee
- shop category
- lunch product
- gamification badge and karma rank
PR: #34925
Julien Castiaux