Without demo data, for the odoo-master transifex project
closesodoo/odoo#41935
X-original-commit: dab7670b73506fb3a835695ee3bd735e0c5e5c2b
Related: odoo/enterprise#7287
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Followup of a425695e
The terms were back in 12.0
Courtesy of Juan José Scarafía
closesodoo/odoo#41624
X-original-commit: 85d0c7001a997748d7691205bbb8d066597591a5
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
*website_crm_partner_assign, website_customer
Before this commit, some models would create their own `website_published`
field rather than using the `website.published.mixin` mixin which should be
used instead.
That was done to be able to override the default value of the boolean.
This commit simply adds the possibility to override the default value of the
mixin field.
Also, help and string could simply be added on xml views rather than overriding
the field.
The `website_published` field from the website's mixins is basically a readonly
from `is_published` field.
On read, this field will simply read `is_published` and check if the record's
website_id is accessible (only for the multi mixin).
On write, it will always write on `is_published`.
This commit improves a few things:
- A lot of code was writting on website_published which was just then writting
on is_published. Writting directly on is_published makes more sense.
- Some backend fields would still reference `website_published` instead of
`is_published` which would just go through the related for no reason.
Plus, using `is_published` will make the field tooltip more accurate as we
are not in a website context ('Visible on current website' to 'Is Published')
- Filter and search on tree view were still using the `website_published`
related field, which is just a readonly when we are not in a frontend
context.
- Some create and write function would have security check on
`website_published` value but that was wrong as the user could bypass that by
simply writting on `is_published`. For the write method, check `is_published`
is more accurate as it will cover both case since `website_published` will
then call the write method on `is_published`
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
Purpose
=======
Some formviews are useless since there are so few relevant fields https://nimb.ws/1EdMV7
For instance, to create a new lost reason the user is forced to:
1. Hit create
2. Type in the name of the record
3. Hit save
4. Go back to the treeview
While he could simply type them away in an editable treeview.
The goal of this task is to allow for creation/edition of records in such models
directly from the treeview.
Specification
=============
Modify tree views from a given list of models for which the
treeview has to be made editable bottom.
If not specified otherwise, the content treeview should stay the same.
If a field is readonly/required/etc. in the formview, it should be in the
editable treeview as well.
Relabeling has to be done of the field itself, not in the view.
TaskID: 2026126
closesodoo/odoo#34577
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closesodoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Martin Trigaux