* mass_mailing, payment, point_of_sale, portal, survey, web, web_tour,
website_blog, website_crm_partner_assign, website_event,
website_event_questions, website_form, website_forum, website_gengo,
website_hr_recruitment, website_links, website_mail,
website_mail_channel, website_mass_mailing, website_quote,
website_sale, website_sale_options, website_slides, website_twitter
This commit reviews the whole "JS side" of the web_editor and website
apps. This is a first step to be able to improve them with new and
better functionnalities; this commit is not supposed to change any
visual behavior.
The main goal was to achieve a structure similar to the backend one.
Now, the frontend side also has a root widget (like the WebClient)
and all other widgets are attached to it one way or another. This allows
the benefits of using the 'trigger_up' functionnality for example.
As RPC are now mainly done with the `this._rpc` functionnality (being
possible thanks to the parent hierarchy), the frontend will also be
possible to test thanks to QUnit in a future update (besides the "text"
editor side which still requires a refactoring to be able to do that).
---
Here are some of the changes:
(-) conventions and documentation
The code has been updated to follow JS conventions and a lot of code has
been commented (around +2000 lines of comment). This also means that
lots of functions have been renamed to use camelCase or simply to make
their name understandable.
See https://github.com/odoo/odoo/wiki/Javascript-coding-guidelines.
(-) deprecated: web_editor.base
The "web_editor.base" module has been split and does not force the
modules which require it to wait for DOM ready anymore. This was indeed
slowing loading times, but also prevented to use some modules in some
contexts (see the LESS editor use in web_studio which is the subject of
another task).
Now the "editor context" can be got thanks to the "web_editor.context"
JS module with its "get" function.
The "web_editor.base" module should probably not be used anymore (see
its code and recent updates).
(-) new: web.dom_ready
If a JS module should wait for the DOM to be ready to be executed, a
new JS module has been created: "web.dom_ready". This should always
be used in a module which only want to instantiate stuff. Do not
extend (or worst, include) classes after DOM ready.
(-) website.website
The "website.website" module has been split. "website.website" does not
return anything useful anymore, it just initialize some miscellaneous
stuff, without waiting for the DOM to be ready. You might want to check
"website.utils", "website.content.compatibility" or `WebsiteRoot`. Also
`website.form` has been deleted (use `this._rpc`), so has been
`website.error`. `website.prompt` will be removed in a future update to
be replaced by `Dialog.prompt`.
(-) widgets are great
Many classes which were not widgets are now widgets. This allows them to
use the 'events', the 'xmlDependencies' and the 'this._rpc' features for
example. Here are some of the main ones:
- Snippet options: these were classes with a `$el` for the menu element
and `$target` for the customized element. This is still the case
but following standard `Widget` structure (one exception: using
`this.$(...)` searches in the `$target` as before this update).
- Snippet animations: instead of class instances with a `$target`
element which can be `start` and `stop`, these are now standard
widgets which can be `start` and `destroy`. `this.$target` is
an alias to `this.$el` for ease of compatibility.
- Snippet editors: instead of class instances in charge of an editor
overlay, these are now widgets. Each "child" snippet editor is
properly attached as a "child", which allows editors to communicate
and to be properly destroyed.
(-) root widgets and website navbar
The frontend is different of the backend. In the backend, the page has
an empty <body/> element and all the components are instantiated from
parent to children (i.e. the `WebClient` is instantiated and is in
charge of instantiating the `ControlPanel`, etc). The frontend cannot
work like that on page loadings as they are way more frequent than in
the backend and we do not want them to flicker. A frontend page is
loaded as a <body/> element which already contains the website navbar
and its menus and the whole content page. JS code has to be "attached"
to these existing elements. This is possible thanks to the `RootWidget`
instances and the specialized `WebsiteRoot`, `IframeRoot` and
`WebsiteNavbar` (see code for details).
(-) lazy loading
No more (or at least a lot less) XML/JS has to be loaded on page
loading, thanks to the use of the `Widget.xmlDependencies` feature.
XML which have to be lazy loaded is loaded only on related Widget
instantiation if necessary, which allows to execute a lot of JS code
before the DOM is ready and to start many widgets on DOM ready (not
later). A visual benefit of this is clicking on the 'edit' button as
soon as it is possible: before this commit, this was sometimes not
doing anything as event handlers were not binded yet.
Still a possible exception: loading the session and locales. This may
be asynchronous stuff which is still required before widget
instantiations but this will be the subject of another task.
(-) deprecated code and code location
More than reviewing code and organizing it, many apparent dead code was
removed. More importantly, mislocated code was put in the right app.
This is the case for snippet animations which is a concept for website
apps but was defined in the web_editor app, or some translation concepts
which were part of website but should have been part of web_editor.
---
There are probably more things to say about this commit but I will let
the comments speak for those.
There was a problem with the new `ajax.loadXML` implementation
introduced with 417a664f16
Indeed the following case was buggy:
```
ajax.loadXML('URL1', qweb);
ajax.loadXML().then(function () {
ajax.loadXML('URL2', qweb);
});
```
With this code, 'URL2' is scheduled to be loaded when 'URL1' is fully
loaded. The problem is that the deferred returned by the call to
`ajax.loadXML` without argument was resolved before the internal
`isLoading` variable was reset to `false`. So, the loading of 'URL2'
was indeed scheduled when 'URL1' was fully loaded but its loading
never started because the `ajax.loadXML` loading loop was still marked
as running (so it was not started again as it should have been).
Commit 7cd2f6370 (in 10.0) recently added attribute special='cancel'
on the 'Cancel' buttons of the Settings views in Odoo. The attribute
wasn't really supported in this case by the old web framework, so
this commit also slightly adapted it, and made it reload the whole
webclient when such a button is clicked.
This commit now needs to be forwardported in saas-16, so we have to
handle the case in the new views as well. Before this rev., it
crashed, because the BasicModel tried to reload a new record (the
one of the Settings form view), so basically it performed a 'read'
RPC on a virtual ID like 'virtual_123', and the server didn't really
appreciate.
This rev. handles the case where a new record is reloaded, and
simply performs a 'default_get' instead of a read. Bonus point:
with the new views, we don't have to reload the whole webclient.
*account_asset
When a button of type 'action' is clicked (execute a given action),
special keys must be set in the context (active_id, active_ids and
active_model). They must be computed regarding the record containing
the clicked button, i.e. if we are in a modal, it must be the id
and model of the record displayed in the modal.
Before this rev., we always sent the id and model of the record
displayed in the background (i.e. the id and model of the url).
This caused a bug in MRP that could be reproduced as follows:
- open a manufacturing order in form view
- click on edit
- click on one of the line of the one2many, and click on the green
icon to edit a product
- click on the update product quantity button on top of it
- the product field must be correctly filled, which was not the
case before this rev.
Date fields have magic grouping methods to specify how to group on
them like date:month, date:weeks, date:days for example. It needs
to be handled properly since date:month is not a valid field name
but date is.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
- Go to Sales/Dashboard
- Click on My Pipeline
- Group by "Creation Month"
Basically, this can be triggred from any view which has a search
view which defines a group using the magic date grouping methods.
Purpose
=======
Projects and soon sales teams have a manual "favorite" button that calls a toggle_favorite method
It should actually be a widget on a boolean field
Specifications
==============
Develop a favorite widget for kanban view that allows to toggle a boolean field
Probably update boolean field to allow inverse method on it
Functionally nothing changed.
This merge make the customer portal available independently from website
module. This implies moving some routing features from website to a new
http_routing module. Customer portal is located in a new portal module.
Sale and account customer portal are moved directly into sale and account
module, and in sale_payment and account_payment for the online payment
part. Most of website_payment code is moved to payment as it holds
customer portal features related to payment.
This merge removes website_portal, website_portal_sale and website_account
module.
This closes#17100.
This commit moves the whole customer portal to the portal module.
It now completely uses portal and http_routing features and is not
dependent on website anymore.
An override of web controller is added in portal in order to redirect
portal users to /my instead of /web. That way once having the customer
portal installed all share users are correctly redirected to their
account.
All modules defining customer portal templates and controllers are
updated accordingly.
Since commit 417a664f16:
The `ajax.loadXML` function has been refactored and improved so that
multiple calls to the function with the same URL only loads it once
and so that the deferred which is returned really indicates the status
of loading this particular URL.
Unfortunately, there was a mistake: when loading the same URL twice,
the second call always returned an already resolved deferred if the
first call to `ajax.loadXML` was done with this URL.
This module adds required base code for a fully integrated customer
portal. It contains the base controller class and base templates.
Business addons will add their specific templates and controllers
to extend the customer portal.
This module contains most code coming from odoo v10 website_portal.
Purpose of this module is to allow the display of a customer portal
without having a dependency towards website edition and customization
capabilities.
Some CSS files used in frontend assets are already moved to have a
working portal skeleton. A is_public method on users is also added
as it will be used in various portal code soon.
Such buttons are not going to work on records that actually do not
exist yet. The behavior is now the same as in saas-15.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Enable lots in Iventory
- Choose a product which is a component of another (through mrp bom)
- Set this product as tracked by lot
- Set this product inventory quantity to 0
- Create a new manufacturing order for the product for which it is a
component
- Click on "Check Availability"
- Click on Produce
- Click on the little square with a + in the m2m list view, the
server will crash in the ensure_one of the function called by
the button since there is no record to run it on.
Previously, we did not handle the case where the result of the m2m
default get was a new record. In this case, we can't just send a
replace all command giving the ids since the new record has no id.
We decided to keep the replace all command even when it is empty
to stay consistent with the o2m implementation, even though saas-15
did not behave like that.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Enable lots in Iventory
- Choose a product which is a component of another (through mrp bom)
- Set this product as tracked by lot
- Set this product inventory quantity to 0
- Create a new manufacturing order for the product for which it is a
component
- Click on "Check Availability"
- Click on Produce
- You'll get an error as the id given to the onchange is a virtual one,
rather than a create which would not include an id.
Previously, it used to create a virtual datapoint even though there was
no change on this field. If the field was a many2one, this datapoint
triggered a name_get call afterwards, but giving the virtual id of
the datapoint since there is no real record. The solution is to avoid
creating a virtual datapoint when it is not needed at all, thus fixing
the wrong name_get call.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Enable lots in Iventory
- Choose a product which is a component of another (through mrp bom)
- Set this product as tracked by lot
- Set this product inventory quantity to 0
- Create a new manufacturing order for the product for which it is a
component
- Click on "Check Availability"
- Click on Produce
- You'll get an error as the web client tries to fetch the name_get of
this datapoint even though the record does not exist.
Purpose: Replace POS APP settings with a clean POS Form settings,
one per POS
- add state button for (active/inactive) archive/unarchive and remove boolean field.
- remove 'Reprint Receipt' field from pos_reprint module and related code.
- remove 'Multi-currencies' field and related code.
- put 'Company' field under the 'Taxes' block and 'Sales Channel' under the 'Pricing' block.
- add 'save' buttons to install needed modules manually.
- removed constrains and set default fiscal value on fiscal position ids even if that not selected.
- change the skip Receipt Screen label to a more appropriate one.
- Tax help only appears when Tax-included is selected.
* [IMP] point_of_sale: Removing multiple prices prod
Purpose: The choice of the method for "Multiple price per product" was
not appropriate for the Point Of Sale. Only the choice of the Pricelist
make sense. So, only the Pricelist can be choosen in the POS config.
* [IMP] point_of_sale, pos_discount, pos_restaurant:
Generic module install
Purpose: Before this improvement, some fields were used in pos.config to
automatically install some modules.
This fix tries to mimic the ResConfigSettings transient so that
when a field starts with 'module_', it's automaticaly
installed.
Onchange RPCs return an object that may contain a 'domain' key.
When it does, its value is an object whose keys are field names and
values are the new domain for the corresponding field.
Commit 8473bde8 added the support of the 'domain' key, but stored
it directly in the fieldsInfo (an object gathering information of
the fields in the view, and which is shared between all records).
This was wrong as the domain isn't necessarily the same for all
records. To reproduce, with the UOMs activated, go to Sales >
Quotation, in the form view, add an order line, set a product
(e.g. Graphic Card), the onchange sets the domain for the uom
field (matching uoms like 'unit', 'dozens'). Add a second line
with a service product, the onchange returns another domain for
the uom field (matching uoms like 'hours', days'). Click again on
the uom field of the first line, the domain is the one of the
second record, which is wrong.
This rev. directly stores the domains returned by the onchange on
the object representing the record, so that this information isn't
shared between records anymore.
Before this commit, it was impossible to load the x2many fields subviews when
they were not defined inline.
Now it is possible to call the method "_loadSubviews" to do so.
Used mainly in studio, to be able to display the x2many fields without inline
views.
The Odoo Dialog API already had the "confirm" helper to open a dialog
which shows two buttons: one to confirm and one to cancel. This commit
introduces the "safeConfirm" helper which requires two clicks to
effectively confirm.
Note: this will be used by the upcoming website update.
Odoo checkboxes have a special style which requires a special DOM
structure. Instead of having to build this structure each time we need
a checkbox to be rendered, it is better to have a function that does
that. It is also better to have a JS function for this instead of a qweb
template so that this has not to be lazy loaded by the frontend for
something as simple as a checkbox.
Before this revision, editing a many2one inside an x2many field did not
cause an update of the x2many field upon saving. This is due to the fact
that a field on a screen was deemed affected by a record change only if
its value or a directly related record has been updated.
This present revision looks for changes recursively, thereby including
the case where an x2many field contains a many2one.
The bug appeared for example in Manufacturing, when editing the product
name of a BOM line.
To reproduce:
- Go Website Admin > Configuration > Settings
- Change the Website Name
- Click on 'Cancel'
The name is saved.
When the "Cancel" button is clicked, we automatically save the record
(which is a transient model). Since the field is a related to the
company, the name is changed even if we canceled.
opw-760749
Opening a modal in Odoo should be done thanks to the 'Dialog' class. In
the frontend, there can also be modals which are meant to be shown to
the unconnected frontend visitors and those should then get the style of
the website (bootstrap) and not the one of odoo. To manage this, the
website JS code was extending the Dialog class so that it adds the
'o_website_modal' class on modals which are opened thanks to the class.
The LESS code was then in charge of forcing the Odoo style on those.
This behavior is not the right one. "Visitors" modals should also be
able to be opened with the Dialog class. This commit is a first step
towards to the right behavior:
- The standard 'Dialog' adds the 'o_technical_modal' class on its root
element by default and allows to not put it thanks to 'technical'
options.
- 'o_website_modal' is then replaced by 'o_technical_modal'.
What should be done next is:
- Use the Dialog class when it is possible
- Move modal.less in the common assets and make it style only technical
modals -> remove some forcing of the style on 'o_technical_modal' in
the frontend
This behavior also allows future improvements, like building a
completely different structure for technical modals which would allow
better designing and the end of visitor/technical bootstrap conflicts
(and so LESS efficiency).
* web_editor
Odoo extends jQuery to add some utility functions. The 'prependEvent'
one add the possibility to add an event handler on an element (like
the jQuery built-in 'on' function) but to be executed before the
already binded ones.
This function was however incomplete and did not allow to use jQuery
namespaced events.
* web_editor, web_tour
jQuery has the built-in ':visible' selector. This is however not enough
as this only checks if the element and its parents have a visible
'display' property. Ironically, if the element has the 'visibility'
property set to 'hidden', it will be considered ':visible' by jQuery.
This commit creates the ':hasVisibility' and ':hasOpacity' selectors
which respectively check if the element and its parents have a visible
'visibility' property and a visible 'opacity' property.
Since the switch to the new views, clicking on a 12am cell in a week
view of calendar triggers a traceback. A similar issue happens when
creating an event at 11.30pm. This is due to the fact that events
starting or ending at 12am are suspected to be incorrect and are thus
checked against the database.
This commit fixes both issues, by requiring that database checks be
carried out only if the records actually exist in the database.
The rev. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/99ae418bf24171fbc6bb27584059c27efb857e77
introduced a trigger_up `mutexify` when quick creating a record in a many2one ;
this broke the behaviour when the many2one was standalone (because it has no
BasicController and mutexify is handled in the latter).
An attempt to fix this issue has been made in the rev. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e83c3e2678500c9bf2c17b4d23ae9a294ebafaa7
by adding an option `standalone` in the field widget options. In this case,
the action was directly executed instead of the trigger_up. While this correctly
works, this implies that the option needs to be added in every standalone
many2one (and only many2one as the others won't use the option), which is not
very convenient.
An other attempt is made in this rev. by moving the mutexify handler from the
BasicController to the FieldManagerMixin ; as a widget that instantiates a field
widget needs to extend this mixin, both cases will work and we won't need to
specify the option anymore.
This commit thus partially reverts the rev. https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e83c3e2678500c9bf2c17b4d23ae9a294ebafaa7
When I did efd15852, I accidentally undid d20074c5. That commit
wanted to filter out unwanted values from the action context, but
it was too violent, as it was discarding the action context. (See
bug described in efd15852)
My original commit aimed at avoiding the filtering of the action
context by having it devoid of unwanted values altogether. The
idea was "if this is an action button, we don't want the element
context". However, the default behavior of the _getContext function
was to add the element context. There were options to force to add
the element context despite being in a case where it should not be
added, but we needed the opposite: do not add the element context.
We used "additionalContext" in this fashion, the idea was: "if I
give you specific context values, don't polute it with the element
context". This was efd15852.
However, not all actions have context defined explicitely in their
definition. In this case, since additionalContext was undefined,
the element context was added again, despite our will not to add
it for actions. We solved this by simply always giving an
additionalContext to getContext, providing an empty one if needed.
To reproduce this bug (which is the same as efd15852):
- Go to Manufacturing
- Click on menu Master Data then Products
- Open a product
- Click on the "Bills of Materials" stat button
- Click on create
- The create crashes because of the "default_type" context key
that is erroneously passed from the "Products" action to the
"Bills of Materials" stat button action.
This commit aims to reproduce saas-15 behaviour when rendering the
calendar. More explicitely, in favourable conditions, we would like the
calendar to be contained in a scroller adapted to the screen dimensions.
To do so, we require that the calendar only use the height given by its
parent container (in case of overflow, the calendar should have its own
scrollbars). We then trigger a 'resize' event to account for a bad
initial render of the calendar.
This fix reproduces a behavior implemented in saas-15.
It avoids simultaneous actions when you quickly click
on status bar buttons.
For example, in a manufacturing order, the main_flow_tour clicks
on 'check availability' and 'produce'.
Clicking on 'check availability' triggers an act_window_close
action when it has done.
Clicking on produce opens a dialog. Both action are executed simultaneously.
It may happen that the act_window_close closes the dialog opened by action
'produce', which makes the test fail.
Now the following buttons are disabled if you click on a status bar button:
- action buttons in control panel
- action buttons in status bar
- stat buttons in button box
qsm-odoo