The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
The xpath was wrongly replacing the 'owner_user_id' field before the
kanban templates definition (which isn't displayed in the view).
closesodoo/odoo#53459
X-original-commit: b63043e36702046000aedf3f1f934122d51ef441
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The purpose of task is to update the 'user/employee avatar' to the new
widget in all the kanban view across all modules.
The below new widget are introduced for avatar:
- many2one_avatar_user (for user_id fields)
- many2one_avatar_employee (for employee_id fields)
which displays the avatar (i.e. picture) of a user/employee in front
of his name and clicking on the avatar will open a chatbox to message
that specific user/employee.
So in this commit, For each kanban view with a user or employee avatar,
replaced it by the field with the new 'many2one_avatar' widget.
TaskID: 2244928
Related Enterprise PR: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/10420
closes odoo/odoo#50789
Closes: #50789
Related: odoo/enterprise#10420
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Impacted modules: account_analytic_default, crm, event,
hr_recruitment, maintenance, mass_mailing, project,
purchase_requisition, stock_picking_batch, website_slides
The default image displayed when the record is unassigned is
confusing, so we are removing it.
FP request
Task 2234524
closesodoo/odoo#49333
Related: odoo/enterprise#9834
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Impacted modules:
hr, hr_contract, hr_recruitment, hr_payroll, fleet, hr_skills, hr_appraisal, ....
Several onchanges have been converted to computed fields in the following modules :
Community :
- hr
- hr_contract
- hr_recruitment
- hr_work_entry
- hr_maintenance
- hr_expense
- hr_expense_check
- hr_holidays
- sale_expense
- account_analytic_default_hr_expense
Enterprise:
- hr_contract_salary
- hr_referral
- hr_payroll
- hr_payroll_expense
- test_l10n_be_hr_payroll_account
There are still 2 onchanges with complex behavior that couldn't be converted easily:
- an onchange that updates "tz" (timezone) that is defined as a related field
to "resource_id.tz". Apparently it is useless except to initialize the default
value of "tz".
- an onchange that updates "name" that is defined as a related field to
"resource_id.name".
the applicant.
closesodoo/odoo#45414
Taskid: 2169099
Related: odoo/enterprise#8572
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Without demo data, for the odoo-master transifex project
closesodoo/odoo#41935
X-original-commit: dab7670b73506fb3a835695ee3bd735e0c5e5c2b
Related: odoo/enterprise#7287
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Followup of a425695e
The terms were back in 12.0
Courtesy of Juan José Scarafía
closesodoo/odoo#41624
X-original-commit: 85d0c7001a997748d7691205bbb8d066597591a5
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
* converts dynamic domain from onchange_department_or_employee_id to a
static domain on the field
* remove the department_id field (and all uses of it), it looks to
never be set and not really be settable: the field is hidden in the
form, doesn't have a default value, does not have anything to
compute it, ...
* remove the onchange itself as it has very little value: it
auto-selects an equipment if there exists a single equipment
assigned to the selected employee or to no employee
Even if we removed the "equipment not assigned to any user"
bit (under the assumption that people would mostly request
maintenance for their own equipment, and that this would usefully
trigger more often) it's unlikely for dedicated users of
hr_maintenance to assign only one equipment per employee. So the
onchange would rarely do any useful work, and what work it saves is
trivial: if there's only one equipment the employee could ask about
for maintenance it's really trivial to do that.
Task 2115472
closesodoo/odoo#40963
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
In the employee form view and in the employee profile, the stat button
displaying the equipment count is wrong.
It counts the equipment owned by the user, not equipments assigned to the
employee.
closesodoo/odoo#38889
X-original-commit: 07bd725c97519a82cc76f3069614ac70b49495a3
Signed-off-by: lul-odoo <LucasLefevre@users.noreply.github.com>
There are too many image sizes. Since they are stored resized this takes time to
generate when saving a new image, it's more rows on the attachment table, more
files on the disk, ...
64px is close enough to 128px that it can be removed without a big impact on
download size.
It will even reduce download and number of requests when both images are
displayed because now only one has to be downloaded and then benefit from cache.
The difference between the two is typically around 1.5kB which is negligible
these days, especially when the request overhead is around 0.5kB already, not
even taking into account other factors such as latency.
If a 64px image must absolutely be returned, it is still possible to pass the
size parameters to the image route. But the current guideline is to handle
resizing in the views when necessary.
Views
=====
- remove width and height attributes when existing CSS rules are overriding them
(eg. `.oe_kanban_avatar` in the right context)
- add CSS rules instead of width and height attributes when possible
- use `object-fit: cover;` where width and height are forced to avoid distortion
of non-square images
- for products, use `object-fit: contain;` instead, keep ratio but without crop
- add new CSS rules where the expected size was max 64px*64px before due to the
image size itself
- remove `img-fluid` where using size classes to avoid conflicting rules
task-2060865
closesodoo/odoo#36147
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Modify tree view for MRP Production
Modify form view and tree view for Unbuild orders
Add group by for Bill of Materials
By default show line shart when opening MRP Production report
Modify view for Work Orders
Modify view for Work Centers
Modify view for Routings
Modify view for Maintenance Request
Modify view for Bill of Materials
task-2042304
closes - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/35482
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
Purpose
=======
While cleaning the stat buttons across all modules, we
decided to move the (un)archiving from stat button to
actions in the 'Action' dropdown.
Specification
=============
Remove the 'active' stat buttons in all views
* attendance, contract, fleet, holidays, maintenance, presence,
timesheet.
For the model 'hr.employee', replace the actions menu 'Archive/Restore'
by the stat button. That's why adapted changes regarding xpath.
Also rename the actions menu 'Time Off' by 'Time off'.
Linked to task 1984526
Related to PR #33720
General Purpose
===============
We want an 'Employee profile' gathering every data about an employee.
The main form view is modified to become this employee profile.
A user can also see his own profile through the Preferences menu.
The new profile replaces the current Preferences view if the hr module is installed
and the current user is linked to an employee.
A user should be able to see and edit his own profile.
*Problem*:
Many fields on hr.employee are protected by groups="hr.group_hr_user".
Therefore, a regular user cannot see or edit those fields.
This protection must be bypassed to allow read/write access
to the regular user's own data.
A similar mechanism already exists for res.users (for Preferences)
The better (least worst) solution found is to reuse this mechanism by adding related fields on res.users.
Pros:
- Don't change security access on hr.employee
- Don't implement yet another custom security layer, risking to add new security breaches
- A lot of fields are added by other modules on hr.employee.
It would have required to integrate them with the custom security layer.
- Fields added by other modules on the user's preferences view (normal view, not the profile)
are automatically included in the employee's profile view.
- Allow the hr.employee form view to be different than the user profile accessible
through the Preferences menu.
E.g. add custom buttons only relevant to the logged in user such as "Request a leave".
Cons:
- Each field from hr.employee that you want to appear on its profile
must be added as a related field on res.users
- Those related fields must be added to user's preferences view (duplicate views)
- They also must be added to SELF_[READABLE | WRITABLE]_FIELDS
Note:
When the front-end loads the views it gets the list of available fields
for the user (according to its access rights). Later, when the front-end wants to
populate the view with data, it only asks to read those available fields.
However, in this case, we want the user to be able to read/write its own data,
even if they are protected by groups (groups are kept on the related fields on res.users).
The front-end need to be made aware of those fields by sending all field definitions.
hr_attendance
=============
This commit integrate attendance in the new employee profile.
It also adds a stat button to this employee profile showing
the number of hours worked last month.
Remove the boolean computed field 'manual_attendance'.
This field is just a shortcut to add/remove the employee's user
in the "Manual Attendance" group.
The checkbox is confusing on the employee's form and this should
be done through the normal group management screens.
hr_presence
===========
Display the presence status on the employee kanban template.
The status is a colored chip which can be green (present),
orange (to define) or red (absent).
Currently, the presence status is only computed when accessing
the report view. As this commits displays it on the employee kanban,
it should be updated more frequently.
The state should not be updated every time the kanban view is loaded
since the computation is a bit heavy. Instead: add a cron to update
status every 15 minutes.
-> The status is accurate on the report view (status is still updated
when loading the view)
-> The status in accurate at 15 minutes on the kanban view
[ADD] hr_attendance_presence
============================
Bridge module between hr_attendance and hr_presence.
This commit integrates hr_presence module in the employee
profile and adds the presence status on the employee kanban view.
But hr_attendance adds at the same place a similar status icon for
checkin/checkout.
This bridge module makes the status from hr_presence invisible as
hr_attendance should be the main presence control mechanism.
Also, this commit adds the ability (through a new setting option)
for hr_presence to take into account checkin/checkout to determine
the presence status.
l10n_be_hr_payroll
==================
integration with employee profile
Purpose is to clean the use of tracking parameters on fields. Parameters are
merged and is now tracking=<int> or tracking=True.
This commit is linked to task ID 1903814 and PR #28430.
