When trying to upload a file with no ASCII name, it raised a
traceback saying: "UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character ..."
opw:1886602
A copy call cn be made with a specified value to an inherits value, e.g.:
self.env['product.product'].browse(42).copy({'product_tmpl_id': 1})
In such scenario, it is assumed the translations are already correct on the
specified related record and should not be used in the copy translation.
i.e. the translations of the product.template 1 must not be duplicated during
the copy call above
Same logic for One2many fields which should not recursively copy the
translations for user provided values
Closes#27108
Backport of fccfd36e05, 4ba7fbbf81 and 1421949c67 to saas-11.3
[FIX] tools: use pot as reference file
In the first attempt at #26134, the pot_targets was cleared after creating
the pot_rows object.
Since the rows not present in the pot_targets are now skipped, clearing the pot
should not be done.
Still use a temporary list pot_rows to avoid modifying the list we are iterating
on.
Update the .po test file to match the new file format
[FIX] tools: import translation file without pot
Due to fccfd36 and 4ba7fbb the translations were only imported, considering the
.pot as the reference.
During import or a manual csv or po file, there is no pot file.
Add tests with Klingon and Dothraki
By default, the `set_value` method doesn't do anything, and is expected
to be overridden. However, `ir.default`, groups and
`ir.config_parameter` are set BEFORE `set_value` is actually called.
This is an issue when it is necessary to retrieve one of these values
before the save, for example in order to compare the value before and
after.
We move the setting of the various values directly in the `set_value`.
This way, it becomes possible to interact with the values before any
modification is performed. On the other hand, the existing logic remains
unchanged.
opw-1882068
'account_accountant' is only defined in enterprise.
Before this commit, many of us forgot to manually install it
before running main_flow_tour in enterprise.
Plus, it was difficult to know that a required module is missing
when a step failed. The error was not clear.
Now, the post hook will check if this module exist (it's the case in
enterprise) and will install it.
When bundle contains both, sass and less, the unlink on old_attachments
will be called twice and thus results in MissingError.
This commit closes#26110
- When a tracked field is modified, a mail.message is created.
When create is called its tries to fill missing values with "default
values".
It first tries to find the default values in the context, which may
occurs.
For example, modifying a tracked field on a subtask will add a key
"default_parent_id" in the context, which is the parent_id of the project.task.
Create will try to use "default_parent_id" for the mail.message
parent_id field, which make the SQL Request invalid.
When two transactions conflicts (eg. deleting same data, see [1]) Odoo
will retry the whole transaction several times hoping for the best.
But when rendering template, the error handling would prevent this
feature. For example a recurring issue was:
- loading quickly two times the /web route
- for each recompute the assets
=> this could lead to 2 concurrents transactions that would delete
previous same attachment (ie. DELETE FROM ir_attachment where id=3).
With this changeset, when getting a template fails because of a
transaction rollback, we let the issue bubble up so our retry system is
used.
So instead of a "500 Internal Server Error" page and in log:
bad query: b'DELETE FROM ir_attachment WHERE id IN (3)'
ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update
"GET /web HTTP/1.1" 200 -
"GET /web HTTP/1.1" 500 -
... big traceback ...
load could not load template
we would get the requested page without error and:
bad query: b'DELETE FROM ir_attachment WHERE id IN (3)'
ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update
"GET /web HTTP/1.1" 200 -
SERIALIZATION_FAILURE, retry 1/5 in 0.8920 sec..
"GET /web HTTP/1.1" 200 -
As a side node, the issue was exacerbated in some instances:
- when running a database on another server: assets are recomputed
- when a module was installed/uninstalled: assets may are recomputed
- when updating the source code: assets may be recomputed
- when starting server: requests could be stacked waiting for readiness
- when using google chrome: the "Use a prediction service to load pages
more quickly" option may load a page two times. for example:
-> an URL is entered in address bar
-> a prediction request to it is started URL
-> go to this page (Enter) when that request is not already resolved
-> the prediction request is cancelled and a new request is started
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/transaction-iso.html#XACT-REPEATABLE-READ
note: 10.0 backport of 11.0 #26778
opw-1849167
closes#26785
When two transactions conflicts (eg. deleting same data, see [1]) Odoo
will retry the whole transaction several times hoping for the best.
But when rendering template, the error handling would prevent this
feature. For example a recurring issue was:
- loading quickly two times the /web route
- for each recompute the assets
=> this could lead to 2 concurrents transactions that would delete
previous same attachment (ie. DELETE FROM ir_attachment where id=3).
With this changeset, when getting a template fails because of a
transaction rollback, we let the issue bubble up so our retry system is
used.
So instead of a "500 Internal Server Error" page and in log:
bad query: b'DELETE FROM ir_attachment WHERE id IN (3)'
ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update
"GET /web HTTP/1.1" 200 -
"GET /web HTTP/1.1" 500 -
... big traceback ...
load could not load template
we would get the requested page without error and:
bad query: b'DELETE FROM ir_attachment WHERE id IN (3)'
ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update
"GET /web HTTP/1.1" 200 -
SERIALIZATION_FAILURE, retry 1/5 in 0.8920 sec..
"GET /web HTTP/1.1" 200 -
As a side node, the issue was exacerbated in some instances:
- when running a database on another server: assets are recomputed
- when a module was installed/uninstalled: assets may are recomputed
- when updating the source code: assets may be recomputed
- when starting server: requests could be stacked waiting for readiness
- when using google chrome: the "Use a prediction service to load pages
more quickly" option may load a page two times. for example:
-> an URL is entered in address bar
-> a prediction request to it is started URL
-> go to this page (Enter) when that request is not already resolved
-> the prediction request is cancelled and a new request is started
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/transaction-iso.html#XACT-REPEATABLE-READ
opw-1849167
closes#26778
The res.users class contains special fields that bypass access rights.
These are designed to allow a user that does not have the possibility to write
on res.users to modify their own fields, such as the mail signature.
Create and write are overriden to make it so, however the check_access_rights
isn't.
Since this method does not work at field level but at model level, there is no
easy way to resolve the incoherence.
Uploadding an image to a signature would add an attachment to the signature;
before being created, an attachment checks if the user has the rights to write
on the target model. The incoherence thus make it fail.
We add a special case when creating an attachment so that a user can write on
itself.
opw 1871243
This commit fixes two bugs:
- a8469c45 was fixing the case where the first line was not 'code' but broke
the usecase where a po started with code line
- Correct the usecase where a pot and po file do not have the same line of code
by matching on res_id=0
This avoids to have a pot expecting a code message at line 42 and a translation
at line 43
Closes#26722
The override of fields_get adds "virtual" fields corresponding to
groups.
If for example we make "res.users" have inherit "mail.thread", we get
these "virtual" field as if they had "track_visibility", since we do a
"fields_get" with fields having track_visibility expecting to only get
back "track_visibility" ones.
So the system would then fail trying to track visibility on fields like
"in_group_5" and for example a res.users could not be created anymore.
With this fix, we fix the fields_get so it respect the fields we ask of
it.
fixes#22332
opw-1878654
closes#22338closes#26705
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Pichler <wpichler@callino.at>
Christophe Simonis