The field is now `quantity`. This wasn't spotted before because the
method is not used anywhere.
opw-2008491
closesodoo/odoo#34067
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Have a multi-company setup, with shared products.
Write the default code of a product; an access error is raised on inventory.line
On inventory.line, the field product_code is defined as related to
'product_id.default_code', and stored.
So when writing on the default_code of a product, we get the inventory lines of
other companies. For obvious reasons their access is protected by the record
rule "Inventory Line multi-company", therefore the access error is raised.
To avoid that situation stored related fields should be in compute_sudo.
Note that similarly this is necessary for product_name.
There is one more subtlety: directly writing on the product.product does trigger
the access error, but writing it on the product.template does not.
opw 2007167
closesodoo/odoo#34019
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
- Create a product A of type "Service", Invoice based on "Milestones",
Service Tracking "Create a task in a new project".
- Create a new SO with A, confirm.
- Go the to task associated to the SO, go to "Timesheets" tab, add an
entry
- In the SO, edit the delivered quantity
- Create invoice, validate
Back to the SO, delivered quantity is reset to 0.
We make sure to filter out SO lines which have a delivered quantity set
manually.
Introduced by d6ad22227c.
opw-1982020
closesodoo/odoo#33991
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Before this task, when creating the related field from the studio, it is by
default stored. When we change the field name in 'ir.model.fields' using ORM's
write method, it also renames the column in the table associated with the
field's model.
This is the expected behavior. But when someone tries to change the 'name' of a
non stored field, the column is not available in the associated model, and so
trying to rename the column results into traceback. This issue was probably
there for a while but came into light with the task 1985710. More info can
be found on the chatter of the task.
This commit fixes the issue by adding an extra check before renaming the table
column. The query will be executed only when the field is stored and thus
exists in the table.
closesodoo/odoo#33944
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
The content of these fields can't be updated, there's no reason to
even show them. Just remove them from the default / auto-generated
view for client actions.
Task 1772242
closesodoo/odoo#29179
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
For each asset depreciation lines we verify that there are not linked
to a move. This verification was done for each line separately.
Moreover, during the creation of the journal entries, we were writing
on the 'line_ids'. In this case, accessing the move of a line
was invalidating the cache. This fix ensure that this operation is
done out of the loop and the cache is then not invalidated at each
step.
See opw-2000305
closesodoo/odoo#33908
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Since test_pylint was moved into the test_lint module in commit
b27077bb, this could break Odoo instances where a module has test_pylint in its dependency.
With this commit, the test_pylint module is coming back as an empty
module.
closesodoo/odoo#33871
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
When uploading a file to a binary file, then clicking on the
"clear" button, then reuploading the same file...
Before this commit:
The actual input of the field was only changed on user input.
This means that the "clear" action didn't reset the actual value
of the input, and the browser's default behaviour when getting
the same path twice is not to change anything. In the use case,
you couldn't upload the same file until you uploaded another one.
After this commit:
The "clear" action now also clears the value, allowing reuploading
the same file over again.
closesodoo/odoo#33843
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
when we select places warehouses where route can be applied, then unselect that warehouses, warehouses values on m2m tag are not deleted.
because of wrong value empty list on onchange. so remove all records of warehouses if warehouse option was not selected.
closesodoo/odoo#33883
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Before this commit, user would be redirect to / instead of /my after signup.
That error was detected with task-1829827 which has a tour ensuring user is
correctly redirected to /my after signup on the checkout summary after payment.
Since 0229ef4c4a, the `web_login()` super call order has been changed when
called from the `/web/signup` route.
See the commit for more details but basically, before the fix, it went only
through:
1. web.web_login
2. portal._login_redirect
Where now, it goes through:
1. website.web_login
2. auth_signup.web_login
3. web.web_login
4.portal._login_redirect
Thus, portal._login_redirect is not returning `/my` as redirect anymore.
Indeed, website.web_login will ignore its super() and force redirect to `/`
With this commit, website's user are redirected to /my as expected.
Side effect: website's user will also be redirected to /my on login instead of
`/`, which is also prefered.
closesodoo/odoo#33865
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Add two PO with references 'XY' and 'Z' to a vendor bill.
The reference is computed as 'XY, Z' (with ', ' as separator).
Add a PO with reference 'X', the reference becomes 'X' instead of 'XY, Z, X'.
There are two variables that may not be defined (vendor_ref and self.reference),
and specifically the case where a reference is the prefix of another one is not
correctly dealt with.
opw 2005825
closesodoo/odoo#33841
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
For recurrent events, many fields are set to define the recurrency;
these fields are invisible unless (recurrency', '=', True).
However there are fields that depend on fields to define the recurrency,
which are required in some cases.
However in case where recurrency is later set to False, no onchange cleans up
the intermediary values (this is taken care of in the create),
but the 'required' on the non-relevant fields might prevent from saving.
We fix these cases by adding the recurrency in the list of requirements.
opw 2002181
closesodoo/odoo#32698
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
- Create product A:
Reordering rule of 5 units
Set a vendor V
- Create a SO with 1 unit of A
- Create a PO with 1 unit of A for vendor V
- Run the scheduler => the PO contains 6 units
- Run the scheduler => the PO contains 12 units
The PO should not be updated the second time the scheduler is run.
It occurs because the `orderpoint_id` is not set on the PO line, while
the `_quantity_in_progress` method searches for PO lines with the
orderpoint set.
opw-2000962
closesodoo/odoo#33798
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
In a web editor, add some text, select the text, add a link and
immediately discard the link modal. Traceback.
The traceback is a execute `setEnd` on `Range`, that error is thrown
because editable DIV doesn't save old range
Odoo wrap code does some text node split in order to attach the link
just on the selected text. If it correctly re-set the underlying
structure, it does not update the $(editable) structure used to restore
ranges.
After this commit, editable div will use newly created range for the element
for ex:
-> content: test
-> selected content "test"
when click on link dialog:
ec: test , eo: 4, sc: test, so: 0
selected content -> start 0, end 4 -> "test" like this
after clicking on discard:
ec: null text element, eo: 4, sc: null text element, so: 0
selected content -> ec and sc both are null, so it will throw an error
while setting cursor position
after applying fix when click on discard:
ec: test, eo: 4, sc: test, so: 0
selected content -> start 0, end 4 -> "test"
task - 1955863
closesodoo/odoo#33692
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
- When you create a compute field, from the model view, dependence field
was not required when creating a compute field.
- When removing the compute code, the dependence field stays marked as
required.
fine-tuning : f01c195288
opw-2003784
closesodoo/odoo#33760
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Because Odoo still supports Android Kitkat and Internet Explorer, ES5 is
the highest ECMAScript allowed version.
This commit adds a new test that parses each javascript file found in
addons. The test fails if unsupported js code is found. As ES6 is
allowed during tests, the files under a path that contains 'static/test'
are just skipped.
This test uses the es-check tool
(https://www.npmjs.com/package/es-check).
If the es-check tool cannot be found, the test is simply skipped.
Also the test_pylint module is renamed to a more generic name test_lint,
that way, every linter test can find a shelter here.
closesodoo/odoo#33724
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
In a web editor, add some text, select the text, add a link and
immediately discard the link modal. Traceback.
The traceback is a execute `setEnd` on `Range`, that error is thrown
because editable DIV doesn't save old range
Odoo wrap code does some text node split in order to attach the link
just on the selected text. If it correctly re-set the underlying
structure, it does not update the $(editable) structure used to restore
ranges.
After this commit, editable div will use newly created range for the element
for ex:
-> content: test
-> selected content "test"
when click on link dialog:
ec: test , eo: 4, sc: test, so: 0
selected content -> start 0, end 4 -> "test" like this
after clicking on discard:
ec: null text element, eo: 4, sc: null text element, so: 0
selected content -> ec and sc both are null, so it will throw an error
while setting cursor position
after applying fix when click on discard:
ec: test, eo: 4, sc: test, so: 0
selected content -> start 0, end 4 -> "test"
task - 1955863
closesodoo/odoo#33792
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
When opening the pdf at the end of an order Chrome tries to load
/favicon.ico which returns 404 before this patch. We provide the
favicon from the current website.
closesodoo/odoo#33746
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
The stable behaviour of the mail composer is the following:
- if a template adds new attachments, the composer only has this list
- if a template doesn't add attachments, the list is unchanged
- if no template is set, the list is cleared up
In the case of templates, we also check that both static and dynamic attachments
are added to the list.
We clean up after c6d718f211 and subsequently 516f22c398 which failed to take
into account the fact that the attachement list could be a blend of commands
and ids.
Transforming that is taken care of by _convert_to_write, which semantics was
changed by c6d718f211.
To keep the second behaviour, we thus need to add a (5,) command.
opw 2003197
closesodoo/odoo#33706
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
There was no way to inherit properly action_move_create method.
opw:1974069
closesodoo/odoo#33488
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
The field had no triggers on the compute method.
As the field is not stored, it works fine in most cases where the value is
computed in a different transaction that the modification but when it is the
case (e.g. OCA/connector-prestashop#101), the values were incorrect
Add the correct triggers to recompute the value when needed
closesodoo/odoo#30024
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Backport of 610b813c87.
In this way the description of the delivery method can be used on a SO
line. If the description wasn't set, the name of the delivery method
will be used.
opw 2000169
closesodoo/odoo#33551
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
The compute method of a recursive field must be invoked on single
records even when several records are marked to recompute.
closesodoo/odoo#33529
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
When transaction is approved, if for any reason the `customerProfileId`
is missing from the response, the transaction is aborted.
It should succeed even if we cannot create a customer profile.
opw-1998505
closesodoo/odoo#33501
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Traceback generated when trying to pass a datetime object into a function tag
in xml.
<function name="action_name" model="model_name" eval="datetime.date.today"/>
Used to fail.
With this commit now one can pass time, datetime, timedelta, relativedelta,
version, ref, pytz in function tag in xml
Task-id: 1772614
Closesodoo/odoo#29212
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhaval Limbuwala <dli@odoo.com>
When multiple emails (`mail.mail`) are linked
to the same message (`mail.message`),
all the message notifications were being marked as sent
as soon as one of the mail was sent, and not all of them.
This is indeed possible to have multiple emails linked to a single
message, for instance when there are employees and customers in
the followers of a thread, and some must therefore have
the buttons meant for the employees ("Assign me") and some not.
In other words, it was possible notifications were marked
as sent while their associated email was not sent yet.
This revision also comes as an addition to
5d6656d739
as it was possible to receive a bounce coming from
the previous mail sent which wrote on the same notifications `email_status`
than the current message being sent before we could acquire the lock on
them (see commit message of the above mentioned revision),
as it was writing the `email_status` on more notifications that it
should have, including notifications of the previous email.
e.g
- Mail 1
- Message 1
- Recipient A, B, C
- Mail 2
- Message 1
- Recipient D, E
Let's say recipient A bounces
If the email notifying the bounce arrives during the processing of the "Mail 1",
it will be blocked until we release the lock on the `mail.notification` `email_status`
we acquire thanks to having written `exception` on `email_status` before sending the email.
But, as soon as it is unblocked (after the `cr.commit()`),
it will immediately re-attempt the delivery of the bounce email,
therefore writting "bounced" in `email_status` of recipient A,
while the transaction of the second email already began.
When the second email sending will try to write the `email_status`
of recipient A as well
(as it used to write the `email_status` on all the message notifications,
not just the one related to the current email),
it raised a concurrent update.
Therefore:
1. Interrupting the loop, as psycopg2 exceptions are raised and not passed,
2. Replay the sending of the second email a second time.
opw-1984293
closesodoo/odoo#33431
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Nicolas Martinelli