When doing pivot table data visualization, the Unit Cost of several
lines are summed up but there has more meaning if they were averaged.
This will probably still not be perfect (such as averaging two line
with different quantities the quantities would not be taken into
accounts) but it is already slightly better.
opw-694068
Suppose the following usecase: you scan the first product of the
picking. A server onchange is then triggered. You scan the same product
a second time, before the first onchange has returned. You expect that
the first onchange is completely executed before running the second one.
This was not the case. Moreover, some onchanges were not be able to
work with the invalid state of the formview at some times, and crashed.
The previous implementation was wrong because id didn't run the main
barcode processing mechanism inside a Mutex. It was also wrong because
it didn't correctly wait for the onchange to execute (a previous barcode
onchanges or some classic ones) before setting the barcode field.
With 98ed53ce when a form view is saved when a html field is in code
view mode, the change is not lost.
This new backend tour check that when saving in or not in code view, the
content is saved effectively.
The test not in code view would ensure issues like #14381#14351#14394
are detected on runbot.
closes#14475
opw-693052
note: the old test system is used so this test is only for up to saas-11
The intended scenario when using the code view is the following:
1) click on code view button to use code view
2) make changes
3) click on code view button to get back to wysiwyg view
4) save from the wysiwyg view
If the 3rd step was not done:
- for the inline editor, we lose the changes that have been done in
code view,
- for the iframe editor, we lose the entirety of the content.
At one time the user was forced to go back to wysiwyg before being able
to save, but this have been removed hence the present usability issue.
With this fix, when the editor content is saved, if the user is in code
view he is automatically set back to wysiwyg view.
fixes#14648closes#14475
opw-678677
opw-693052
In e0c4ec54ca a change was done to improve the behavior in some
editable list instances, but this introduced a small issue for
list with line creation disabled.
With this change, doing tab or enter at last line should keep the
previous behavior of wrapping around and not creating a new line.
opw-703748
When the 'Invoicing' or 'Accounting' module is installed without the
module 'Sales', only the admin user can create products in the database.
The expected behavior is that any 'Accounting Adviser' should be able to
manage some products in Odoo.
To allow 'Accounting Advisers' to manage products, we add them the CRUD
rights on 'product.product', 'product.template' and
'product.price.history'
opw-703610
When a quality.alert was added from the kanban view, a traceback was raised
due to a coding error. In the fail function, the event is the second parameter.
opw:703281
Split method generate_account() in chart template generation to allow an easier overwritting of the vals in case a localization added some custom fields on account.account object. Courtesy of David Arnold(dar@devco.co)
Since new-api migration of `ir.ui.view`, the method that check views
raises exceptions instead of returning a boolean. Show them as warning.
Related to #14521
On UNIX, the timezone modules conversions can be reset by using
`time.tzset()`. On windows this is not available and the timezone (TZ)
environment variable must be set before the first import of time module.
If not, all datetime gotten in python without specifying UTC (such as
datetime.datetime.now) could be wrong.
This was fixed with 4a77c6a0 in 2013, but has come back since 389c2ba97b
imported pkg_resources (which do a `time` module import) before that.
closes#14926
opw-693764
- Create a SO for a customer (without VAT), validate the invoice
- Connected as the customer, go to 'my/account', and change any
information (e.g. phone number).
You receive the error 'Changing VAT number is not allowed...'.
This is because `data.get('vat', partner.vat)` is `u''`, while
`partner.vat` is `False`.
opw-696962
Previous commit was cleaning the orphan and fuzzy translations of all main translations.
This commit does the same for all regional languages (that are not on Transifex).
To keep these files small, keep only the translated strings.
Fixes#14937
The number of records selected by a FieldCharDomain was only computed
with the base language.
But when selecting the domain with a modal window, or when sending a
mass mailing restricted to a domain, the current user language is used.
With this commit, the number of records is computed with the current
user language.
opw-693836
Was removed at 467ba386 but need it in blackbox for many terms
The alternative is to add all the fields in export_for_printing but this patch,
even if less modular, is way smaller and safer.
When a search is performed and the completion feature is used (search on
a many2one field), clicking on a '(no result)' item causes a crash.
opw-703557
This reverts commit 804ef6f.
1. Generating the vendor bill by adding the related Purchase Order:
in that case, it works well since the system has a first on-change on the product when selecting the asset type;
it sets the asset account in the expense account of the product which in turn is used as the vendor bill account.
2. Creating the vendor by adding manually the product which is an asset:
in that case it takes the wrong account since it used the depreciation account instead of the asset one.
But the labels cannot be changed because the case 1 works.
opw:702265
Some languages were published on Transifex in v9 but no longer in v10.
These languages were still using the outdated .po files
In some of these po, there were some fuzzy translations that were incorrect
(e.g. 'POS Order %s' - 'Kassa ostud', missing '%s')
These were not erased as still using the old translations.
Regenerate a correct .po file based on the new .pot and remove fuzzy
translations.
Fixes similar issue than raised at #14937
The onchange code calls the variable 'partner' before assignement,
this error comes from the migration in rev: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/d45996c9
We fix it by calling the right 'self.partner_id' variable
These `end` migration script will be executed when all modules have
been updated and models setup.
Also accelerate the search of migration scripts, speeding up registry
loading.
To reproduce:
- Configure an external payment provider (e.g. Ingenico) with "Authorize
& capture the amount, confirm the SO and auto-validate the invoice on
acquirer confirmation"
- Create a quotation with a product linked to a subscription
- Send the link to the customer
- Click on "Accept & Pay", use the configured provider
The SO is confirmed, but the invoice is not generated.
By calling `action_confirm` in the callback of the transaction, we
validate the SO before `form_feedback` is called. Therefore, the method
`_confirm_so` will do nothing since the SO is not in state 'draft' or
'sent' anymore.
The solution is to manually call `_confirm_so`instead of
`action_confirm`. This is necessary to do it at this moment since we
might not go through `form_feedback` (e.g. if we pay thanks to wire
transfer).
opw-694273
When reading customized views from our dashbord in reporting,
the measures selected in the customized views were not taken into
account. It happened when the customized view was build from a report.
opw:698105
To reproduce:
- Create 2 products with 'Track Service' set as 'Create a task and track
hours'.
- On a SO, add these 2 products and confirm (2 tasks will be created)
- Go to Timesheet > Activities, and create a line for Task 1. The
delivered quantity of Product 1 in the SO should be modified
accordingly.
- Change the activity line by setting 'Task 2' instead of 'Task 1'.
The delivered quantity of Product 2 is updated accordingly, but the
delivered quantity of Product 1 is unchanged.
This is a complement of commit 4e60d28d00.
opw-693520
opw-695087
When adding a partner "filter" to the calendar view, it only works if we
select directly the partner and not when we choose him via "search more"
or create him on the fly.
This commit uses the partner id directly which is available in the field
value in those three possible instances.
opw-702491
Nicolas Lempereur