Currently when using a language on the website, the following is done in
this order to choose which one will be used:
1) use a language code if present in the url (eg. /fr_BE/),
2) use a language similar to the one in the url,
3) use a previously choosed language (saved in cookie),
4) use the browser language if available on website,
5) use a language similar to the browser language,
6) use the default website language
When a bot is requesting a page, he could either not specify a browser
language (en_US is set as default) or sometimes specify english
erroneously.
In these instance, we will then never use the default website language
if an english language is installed.
This fix changes this behaviour so if a bot is visiting a page, the 4th
and 5th steps are skipped and the default website language is used
instead of using the browser language.
closes#14033
opw-690910
Steps to reproduce :
1. Create a new customer
2. Create an invoice with an amount of 50.- for this new customer and validate it
3. Create a refund with an amount of 70.- for the same customer and validate it
4. Create a Customer Payment for this customer and validate it. The Invoice will be paid with 50.- of the refund. 20.- are still on residual in the refund.
5. Create a new invoice with an amount of 50.- for the same customer.
6. Create a new Customer Payment for the same Customer and validate it.
The Full Reconcile Boolean stays checked inspite of "Open Balance" of Refund amount is less than the Invoice amount.
After the fix:
Full Reconciliation Boolean doesn't get checked and Allocation amount on invoice journal item line should be same
as Open balance of the Refund Journal Item. So Invoice stays open with Balance amount.
opw:691577
A field shared across registries is normally never setup from scratch, except
when its full setup cannot complete. This happens when a registry reuses that
field but fails to load, because the base and full setup of fields look like:
def setup_base(self, model, name):
if self.setup_full_done:
# optimization: keep base setup (1)
self.setup_full_done = False
else:
# do the base setup from scratch (2)
...
def setup_full(self, model):
if not self.setup_full_done:
# complete full setup (3)
self.setup_full_done = True
When the field is reused for the first time, its setup state `setup_full_done`
is reset to `False` (1), and it should be set to `True` again after completion
of full setup (3). However, because the full setup fails, the field remains
with `setup_full_done` equal to `False`.
In that situation, when the same field is reused again, it base setup will be
done from scratch (2), and therefore some attributes (like `column`) are reset
to their initial value. Because the full setup fails again, those attributes
are lost for other registries that share the field.
Fix this crap by precising the setup states: `None`, `'base'` and `'full'`.
When a field is reused, its setup state is reset to `'base'` instead of `None`,
and consequently it will never be setup from scratch again.
Depending on the version of dateutil, rule._bynweekday can either be
a tuple or a set (see https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/pull/54), which,
in the case of a set, breaks the access by index (see related issue:
https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/issues/24).
By casting it into a list, we make sure that we can access [0] in both case.
Credits to jke ; closes opw-690761.
Underscore method _.each expects an array like object when a "length"
property is present.
This was an issue with a record having a numeric "length" field set to a
non-negative value. When changing a line the change would not appear on
blur.
This issue was fixed with 0e664c9e9 but introduced back with f0e331e00.
opw-691070
Forward-port of 5d17749ff4 which has been
forgotten during previous forward-port.
When a group of tax is nested inside another group of taxes, the tax
amount and base are wrongly calculated. It is also the case when a tax
is applied after a group of taxes.
This is because the recursive call doesn't reuse the previously
calculated tax amounts and base, but always use the same entry amounts.
The fix introduces this behavior, and moreover makes sure to include the
tax group in the base amount only if it should.
Closes#13995
When clicking on "Show older messages" in the bottom of the chatter, the
page would jump to the top when the additional messages are loaded.
There is already a functionality in a discuss channel to stay at the
previous scrolling position (related to the content) :
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/ffe0db0d/addons/mail/static/src/js/client_action.js#L506-L521
This fix does the same steps for the chatter.
opw-692010
Consider that you have a custom one2many field based on a custom many2one
field, and that you delete the many2one field. From that point on, it is
impossible to load the registry of the corresponding database. To prevent this
from happening, we add a check before modifying or deleting custom fields.
When unreconciling a payment from an invoice, the link between
the payment and the invoice (in many2many invoice_ids)was kept
and then the invoice still appeared when clicking on the button
invoices in the payment form view.
The invoice must be removed from invoice_ids.
opw:691692
When clicking on the trash to remove a line (e.g. a sale order line
in a quotation form view) while editing another line, it produces a
traceback (in most cases), or behaves randomly (less frequently)
like removing both lines, or one of them, or maybe none of them.
Anyway, this feature doesn't work at all, so this commit simply disables
it when we are in edition mode.
In a perfect world, we would fix the feature instead of disabling it,
but the code of the list editable is so instable that it would most
certainly break something else.
Closes#13778
The dashboard instantiates an action manager for each view it contains.
When removing a view from the dashboard, the $el of its action manager
is simply removed from the DOM, unbinding all DOM event handlers
attached on it and its children, but the action manager isn't destroyed.
It means that Odoo event handlers (like core.bus.on(...)) aren't unbound.
This causes a traceback when removing a calendar view from the dashboard,
because such an Odoo handler is defined, and tries to access some
autocomplete stuff that doesn't exist anymore since the element has been
removed.
This commit ensures to destroy the action_manager.
Closes#13858
- Invoice a POS order => the invoice number is for example 0001
- Close the POS session
- Invoice another POS order => the invoice number is 0003
This is because the journal used for the POS closing entries is the same
than the journal used for the customer invoices. Therefore, the closing
entry consumes a sequence number of the invoices.
This affects POS orders, but potentially SO as well if they use the same
journal.
This is fixed in v10 from commit b5b0d36b31. In v9, we use a workaround
by looking first if a `ir.config_parameter` named
`pos.closing.journal_id` exists. We use this journal for the session
closing.
opw-691771
We support 'returns' in the POS frontend by allowing the user to
specify a negative quantity. Before this patch however, the backend
would always generate a single picking per pos.order. This is
problematic when a pos.order contains both lines with a positive and
negative quantity. The generated move lines would not all have the same
source and destination location and so could not be added to the same
picking.
This commit creates an extra 'return' picking when required and assigns
the generated moves to the correct picking.
Closes#13699Closes#13762
opw-690812
Before this patch, the debian package depends on `python-pybabel`.
According to the documentation, this is a dummy package for transition
from `python-pybabel` to `python-babel`[1].
This dummy package has thus been removed in debian stretch in favor of
`python-babel`, and the odoo package is thus not installable in debian
stretch.
To fix this, we depend directly on `python-babel`, which is available in
all debian releases[2].
Closes#13905
[1] https://packages.debian.org/jessie/python-pybabel
[2] https://packages.debian.org/jessie/python-babel
Underscore method _.each expects an array like object when a
"length" property is present.
This was an issue with a record having a numeric "length" field set
to a non-negative value.
opw-691070
The `map_account()` method expects a browse_record as
parameter, and returns a browse_record (possibly the
argument if no mapping happened).
It was being called with an account ID instead, so
fiscal position mapping would never match, and would
always return the argument itself.
The `fiscal_position_id` field actually depends on both
the `shipping_partner_id` and the `partner_id` field,
not just the former.
Theoretically the recompute should trigger on both fields
anyway because changing the `partner_id` will automatically
change the `shipping_partner_id`.
Unfortunately this onchange chaining does not work as expected
as of Odoo 9, at least when the `partner_id` field is set
to the same value (was done for optimization reasons).
This special case really happens when you edit the Partner
from a sales order form view, and save the changes.
It triggers a "dummy on_change" for the `partner_id`
value, with the same value as before.
If the edit changed the fiscal position or another
field on which it depends, a recompute is really needed.
Adding the direct dependency works around this limitation,
and is semantically valid, too.
An extra fix of this special case in the framework might still
be nice to have, though.
Ref: feedback ID 29042
Underscore method _.each expects an array like object when a "length"
property is present.
This was an issue with a record having a numeric "length" field set to a
non-negative value. When changing a line the change would not appear on
blur.
This issue was fixed with 0e664c9e9 but introduced back with f0e331e00.
opw-691070
This is related to revision
b65c67a259
The field `seller_ids` is a field which is set
on the `product.template`, and this is why
the condition `(x.product_id == product)` is being applied
in the list comprehension searching the current seller
of the product sellers.
The `variant` variable is a string containing
the attribute name of a variant.
Therefore, if a product tempalte has only one variant, without
any attribute (e.g. when you don't use variants),
`variant` will be empty, and therefore the condition
`if variant:` will be `False`, and therefore it won't search
in the product sellers with a specific `product.product`, while it
should, as, even if there are no attributes, there could be a
seller line with this specific `product.product`.
Besides, as we are in the `name_get` of `product.product`, and
not the `name_get` of `product.template`, we are always in the case
of a `variant`, this test is therefore pointless.
opw-682390
In the earlier fix 327f88df, the computation of the amount crashes when the
field `tax_id` is not set. Simply add an 'if' statement to avoid that case.
On the Customer invoice, Vendor Bills and Payments list views.
The feature exists for Journal Items and entries, but not on invoices and
payments.
Closes#13915Fixes#13914
When fetching the journal items linked to a bank statement, the
counterpart items are not retrievd since they are not directly linked to
the bank statement. It makes the entries look unbalanced.
Closes#13673
opw-690231
The below revision force the use of `ABS` on the
`price_subtotal_signed` because of a migration issue:
649b289fa1
This leads to issues regarding the advances, in
`out_invoice` invoices, where this amount
`price_subtotal_signed` is negative, and should
remain negative in this report, otherwise
the advance is counted twice: Once with
the advance invoice, and a second in the actual
invoice where the advance is removed with a line
with a negative `price_subtotal`
e.g.
- A sale order of 500€ without taxes
- Create an advance invoice for an advance payment of 10%: 50€ without taxes
- A second invoice with the remaining: 450€ without taxes
In the invoices report, the total without taxes for this customer was
displayed as 600€ (50 + 500 + 50)
instead of 500€ (50 + 500 - 50)
opw-682390
Now, when the module is not found, instead to display a traceback, we open a popup to upgrade to Enterprise.
That will be wrong in case of outdated / wrong link, but in most cases, it is because it is an enterprise module.
This commit closes#13882
TODO: Remove zindex 1051 on planner in master/saas-14
Goffin Simon