Steps to reproduce the bug:
-Change the default lang on the website to be different than en_US
-Edit the name of a product in the website
Bug:
The name of the product is changed in en_US and not in the language
set on the website. The lang is in fact removed from the context in
function saveElement(in addons/web_editor/static/rte.js).
opw:747084
Creating and editing mass mailing in multiple language is managed with
the change 05daa15.
But currently the language the mass mailing is sent in, is the language
of the "Process Mass Mailing Queue" (root user if not changed) so all
the recipients will receive the mail in the root user language has at
the time the given batch of mails is sended.
So this is different from what someone could expect by it being
translatable. In any case the recipients list could be based on a lead,
a partner a mass mailing contact or other and a language could not be
determinable in stable (a mass mailing contact does not have a language
for example).
If the system worked, there is also a usability downside in the meaning
that someone could duplicate a mail and not check all translation and
not be aware that the mail he see is maybe not the mail that will be
received (if translations have not all been completed).
In stable to have the same behavior in any case and lessen the usability
burden of users thinking erroneously the mass mailing may be sent in
several languages depending on a not-existing heuristic, this changeset
remove the translatability of mass mailing content.
This has the following effect:
no translation editing appear,
the mass mailing is edited and sent in one and the same language,
If someone want to send a mass mailing in several language, currently in
Odoo it would then require to:
duplicate the mass mailing,
change the domains of recipients base on choosen heuristic,
edit the duplicated mass mailing in the choosen language
opw-746445
opw-746776
closes#17718
If the user change the access right to filter some stock location or multi
company, the user can have an access error to read stock pack operation.
opw-747526
Before this the -webkit-text-security CSS property was used. This, as
the name implies, only works in webkit based browsers. Instead we can
just render the PIN code as •'s since the value of the inputBuffer is
used (not the rendered text) when checking the PIN.
Fixes#16458
In version 8.0, there was a stored field `minimum_planned_date`.
In version 9.0, this field was renamed `date_planned` and loose it
store attribute.
In version 10.0. the field is stored again.
Keeping this `oldname` attribute will lead to reuse old data from
version 8.0 when migrating the database to version 10.0.
Closes#17631
opw-744097
Let's consider 4 products P0, P1, P2 and P3 where:
- P0 depends on P1, P2 and P3
- P1 depends on P2 and P3
- P2 depends on P3
NB: "x depends on y" means that there is a phantom BOM for x where
y is in a line.
With this example, before the fix, when creating a MO for P0,
the function "explode" raised a user error saying that there
was a recursion error.
Even if in this case there was no recursion.
Now to check if there is a recursion, a graph of the dependencies of
the bom is created while exploding the boms and a function "isCyclic"
is applied on the graph to verify that there is no cycle which means
no recursion in the dependencies.
The algorithm was taken from this site: http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/detect-cycle-in-a-graph/
opw:745453
When several user run a production on a workorder, things go awry.
For example the end of the "productive" production is computed based on
ProductiveStartTime + DurationExpected - Duration
so if the duration was bigger than the time expected, we easily get a
productive end before the start, and start of the "reduced speed" before
the production actually happened.
eg:
productive time is 30 minutes
user A: start production at 10:00
user B: start production at 10:10
production is set to done at 10:50
=> result before the patch:
user A has been productive from 10:00 to 10:30
user A has not been productive from 10:30 to 10:50
user B has been productive from 10:10 to 10:00
user B has not been productive from 10:00 to 10:50
this is totally erroneous.
=> result after the patch:
user A has been productive from 10:00 to 10:30
user A has not been productive from 10:30 to 10:50
user B has not been productive from 10:10 to 10:50
this is a measure of right, we could argue about wether one or the other
should be productive or not but this is anyway an edge case.
In master we are considering only allowing one user to run a production
at a time but we prefer not to change such a behavior in stable version.
opw-709223
closes#17528
When the user processes a picking with a large amount of pack operations
but validates a few lines (the remaining goes to a backorder), the
operation can fail due to timeout.
Closes#17670
Set up:
- Use the usual working schedule from 8:00 to 12:00 and 13:00 to 17:00.
- Set the OS and user TZ to Australia/Sidney TZ (restart your browser)
- Create a BOM with 3 work orders, taking 1, 2 and 3 minutes (you can
use the 'Assemble Furniture' routing)
- Create a MO using the previously created BOM, e.g. for '[FURN001]
Computer Desk'
Case 1: Plan to start the next day at 08:00, e.g. 2017-06-08
The result is amazing. The system probably hit a flaw in the space-time
continuum, which can only be explained with M-theory:
- WO1 is planned from 2017-06-08 08:00:00 to 2017-06-07 08:01:00
- WO2 is planned from 2017-06-07 08:01:00 to 2017-06-06 08:02:00
- WO3 is planned from 2017-06-06 08:02:00 to 2017-06-05 08:03:00
Case 2: Plan to start the next day at 11:00, e.g. 2017-06-08
Once again, the result is literally a piece of art:
- WO1 is planned from 2017-06-08 11:00:00 to 2017-06-08 08:01:00
- WO2 is planned from 2017-06-08 08:01:00 to 2017-06-07 08:02:00
- WO3 is planned from 2017-06-07 08:02:00 to 2017-06-06 08:03:00
To solve the problem, a first commit is made in MRP to force the end
date to be larger than the start date. That hides the issue, but it
doesn't solve it.
To prevent the system to hit the 88 mph and go back in time, we force a
'hard limit' to prevent any selection of intervals starting before the
requested start time.
opw-745905
Version 2.7.1 is not yet available in most distributions,
but is now considered the recommended version.
Odoo will work just fine with any psycopg2 version >= 2.2, though.
- Set your timezone in Brasil
- Install the Maintenance module
- Create a Maintenance Request, set the Requested Date to 2017-06-15
- Save
In the chatter, the track fields message shows a Requested Date of
2017-06-14.
This can actually happen with any date tracked. The issue comes from the
web client: it converts the date in UTC, which should of course not be
done. This only applies for a datetime, not for a date.
opw-746216
Before this commit, the JS parser would add 0 after the input, then add the ean key.
Whereas reportlab.graphics.barcode fills the input with 0's on the left, then add the key
http://pydoc.net/Python/reportlab/2.5/reportlab.graphics.barcode.eanbc/
At: Ean13BarcodeWidget.__init__()
This commit makes the ean parser coherent with the lib the python uses
Christophe Matthieu