Consider this: a form view with a one2many list view. In the one2many
list view, there is a many2one field. When opening the manyone in a
modal form view, there is a many2many field. In that situation,
clicking on 'Add a new record' on the many2many field had the
unfortunate effect of interfering with the one2many field in the main
form view, which caused a crash or the modal form view to close
unexpectedly.
The issue is that an event was simply not properly stopped at the proper
location. This is usually not a big deal, but, as described above, it can be
a problem in some cases.
... gives wrong values due to the timezone.
For instance, let's assume that the browser timezone of the user
is UTC+2, and the user types 10/09/2017 10:00:00 in a searchview
with a datetime field in its arch (i.e. which autocompletes on a
datatime field). Before this rev., the suggested value was
10/09/2017 12:00:00, i.e. the timezone offset was added to the
value.
opw 779832
Before this rev., the widget was hidden when the value of its
corresponding field (move_check) was falsy. However, it should
always be visible, regardless its value.
opw 781628
Before this rev., sorting groups in list views wasn't supported. It
hadn't been implemented in the new views.
This rev. activates the feature, so groups can now be sorted on
their aggregates again. It also implements a basic (first level
only) sorting in mockReadGroup, in the mock server.
opw 781288
In the view dialog test suite, a few tests created a parent widget, then
created a view dialog, and destroyed the view dialog at the end, but not
the parent widget. As a result, the environment was not properly
restored at the end.
In this case, the test 'SelectCreateDialog correctly evaluates domains'
changed the session (with user_context: {uid: 2}), and this made other
tests crash (web_editor test in particular)
before this event, when editing an email template from the chatter
by adding an image through the mediaDialog, the message was always empty
if nothing more than the image was present.
this was because the html field was not marked as dirty,
the event responsible for the marking was not triggered.
After this commit, when sending solely an image from the media dialog,
the email sent does contain the image
opw 779167
closes#20817
The groups were set only on the view which does not prevent abuses.
The fact that users can bypass the groups on the view is not critical as the
changes are logged but this should be improved nevertheless.
In master, proper record rules should be set.
Closes#20427
Here is a situation where we had a problem:
- a form view with a one2many field, which has no inline views
- the (non inline) list view has a field A, and is not editable
- the (non inline) sub form view has fields A and B, with an onchange on
B which modifies A
In that case, the user could do this:
- go to edit mode
- click on 'add' a new one2many line
- change the value of B in the form view, this changes the value of A
- click on save to close the modal form view
- click on the new o2m record to reopen the modal form view
- rechange B
=> the onchange does not work
The explanation is that when we reopen the modal, we update the known fields
information, but we had to perform a fieldviewget to fetch the list
view, so we have a full knowledge of the fields. However, the code did
not update the fields info (because it uses _.default), which means that
the onchange information contained in the form view is lost.
Note: the test system had to be adapted to more closely simulate what
actually happens. In particular, the onchange flag is no longer added
by the mock server, since it should be done by the data manager, like
'real' code. This change broke the basic model tests, which had to be
modified accordingly, by setting manually the onchange flag.
Before this commit, an issue occured when you tried to
create a new record in a editable grouped list view.
A new line was created with an undefined group.
Editable grouped list views are not supported.
So now, we have to switch on the form view when
you click on create. This behavior is already implemented
when you open an existing record.
In 11.0, this part of the code has been removed.
When choosing the shipping address in the cart, if a tax has been mapped
by a fiscal position, the subtotal was not correctly computed.
opw:778405
adapting #20279 to v10
Before this commit, when starting a livechat session as a public user and continuing as a portal user, the livechat crashed
(the poral user couldn't see the channel created before as Admin)
After this commit, the conversation is kept and security insured by the uuid in the cookie
OPW 775568
closes#20281
The method `_process_jobs` provides an alternative API to process the cron
jobs, that does not catch exceptions and log them. This makes the processing
of cron jobs easier for scripting.
In case we are not uploading a file but add a slide based on google doc url
or youtube link, post['datas'] is not set and the code will crash.
Javascript don't check the onError, so the user never see the error and wait
that nothing happend.
You could try to check followers on a model not inheriting from mail alias
mixin. In that case current code would check followers on a void mail
alias mixin record, meaning no followers found. Instead we now
differentiate the class method from the method checking record properties.
Here is a scenario that could cause an issue:
- open a form view with a many2one
- click on edit button
- click on small external button for many2one. this opens a modal form
view
- click on save in the modal (without changing anything)
- click on save in the main record
- exit form view. this opens a discard dialog
There were two issues here:
- saving the modal dialog automatically marks the many2one field as changed.
This was necessary to force reloading the data, because editing a sub value
in the modal form view could have changed the display_name of the manyone
field. However, this is not necessary when no change was done.
- when saving a record, the _isDirty flag was reset to false only if an
actual rpc was done. However, it may happen that the flag is set to
dirty (for example, when modifying a value inside a many2one), but the
main record has no changed fields.
In this commit, we also remove the on_save handler in the
formviewdialog. This is a small refactoring in a stable version, but no code
currently use it, and I believe that it will make the code much easier
to maintain (the previous code was really awkward), so I think that the
tradeoff is acceptable.
This commit improve the daily use of activities by delegating activities
management to the document. Activities are already managed on document
through the UI either in form view or in kanban view.
Bug brought by f45edfb
Before this commit, the debug manager crashed when clicking on "set defaults" on a view fetching a fieldDependency.
This was because the "options" key on the field was not set when the field originated from the fieldDependency of a widget.
After this commit, the data_manager ensures that key is present
OPW 780071
closes#20730
An error occurred if the domain or context applied on a view
opened in a dialog needed to be evaluated (e.g. if they contained
something like [['some_field', '=', uid]]). For instance, create
a custom filter with such a domain for the Contact model, then go
to Contact, create a new one, and on the parent_id many2one, click
on search more. Before this rev, no eval context was given so the
domains and contexts couldn't be evaluated, and it crashed.
- Create a user A
- Create a lead, assign to A
- Deactivate user A
- Duplicate the lead
A notification email is sent to A (user assigned to the lead).
Since the user is archived, he should not receive any email since it
might contain sensitive information.
opw-778825
After entering a value in a many2one, if one clicks somewhere else, a popup
is opened to suggest the user to create (or not) a new record with the entered
value.
Before this rev, closing this popup resulted in an unclear situation where the
input was still set with the entered value but the new record hadn't been created.
This commit fixes this by clearing the input value if the record is not created.
See task#36055
Before this commit, an opp created from a contact via the portal was assign to
himself instead of the commercial_partner_id.
So the saleperson was not assigned to the opportunity, and the opp created was
not for the company but for the contact only.
That make sense to share the opp to the company and assign the saleman directly.
Thanks to GBR for the reporting.
[FIX] *: do not use groups when extending an asset bundle
Using groups when declaring an extension of an asset bundle leads to a
different generated asset bundle according to the user's group. This
is not something we want because a dynamic asset bundle's content
means that it could (and it does) trigger unwanted cache invalidation.
website_event, website_blog, website_forum and website_sale add
functions to . These functions are bound to
server side qweb nodes protected by groups. We can always add the
functions; if a user tries to use the routes he should receive a
traceback because of lack of access rules
website_blog adds a module, but is guarded by
the presence of a node in the DOM. We use the same logic to guard the
module added by website_sale with the node.
website_gengo is working as expected.
Use case to reproduce:
- Set a product to be expensed
- Set the expense_policy to something else than no
- Do a delivery order with a picking
- Validate the picking
-> Delivered quantity to 0 and impossible to create an invoice
if the invoice_policy is delivered_quantity
It happens due to this commit 48ea59d
What does it do:
- The move could be generated by an expense.
- If the move has 'no' as expense policy thus we won't add it in the invoice
Problem we can't guess if the move come from an expense or not (limitation).
This commit add an onchange on can_be_expense is order to set the expense
policy back to 'no' when the user uncheck it.
Courtesy of amoyaux
opw-777139
When opening the POS in this specific case:
- Under Mozilla Firefox
- auto printing the receipt is True
- invoicing is True
Before this commit, when issuing an invoice for a customer, a Traceback was thrown to the user and the invoice was not downloaded.
This was because the invoiced parameter resolved before the printing action was.
After this commit, we constain the invoiced parameter to be resolved when the action returns.
There is no traceback, and the invoice is downloaded
OPW 777647
closes#20570
- Create a tax:
Fixed amount: 10
Price included
- Add it by default to a product costing 100
- In a SO/PO/Invoice, add 2 units of the product
The total price is 210 instead of 200.
opw-779696
The `sale_stock.tour` failed in the case the admin was not
part of the group
`product.group_stock_packaging`
or the group
`sale.group_mrp_properties`
because then the sale order was working with the editable list,
which does not open a dialog,
while the test was relying on the dialog to be opened,
in order to close it.
The fix is simply to pass the fact to close the dialog if
there is none.
opw-779308
Géry Debongnie