When we open the form view of a package_level, the location_id and
location_dest_id fields are visible evene if multi location is not
enabled on the database. We add the corresponding groups to avoid such a
behavior.
When a move line is in an entire package and the entire package option
is enabled, you shouldn't be able to modify them in the move form view.
So we make all fields of the move lines readonly when it has a
package_level_id and its picking_type has 'Show entire package' option
enabled
When you unpack a quant package, you have to invalidate the reservation
on the move lines reserved on this package and then remove the quants
from it. We need to do it as sudo because, no one has rights on quants.
The field 'packaging_id' of quant package was displayed in tree view,
even if it was impossible to fullfill it because it is added in the form
in module delivery. So the field in the tree view is moved in the module
delivery to be shown whan you can set it.
Before that commit we could ask for an accrual allocation of 0 hours
every 0 weeks for instance.
As it means nothing to ask for this, we add an sql constraint on these
fields and a default value of 1.
Since refactoring of account, payment and sale with commit 01216345 the
`Pay Now` button in the panel-heading of the SO in the portal was always hidden
except if there was a pending transaction.
The button should be visible when there is no transaction. In that case
`payment_tx_id` is an empty recordset, we can safely access its `state` field.
Closes#25529
In stock.move.lots.form view, the field product_uom must be readonly like
the field product_uom_qty.
When creating a raw material, it was not possible to add a stock move line
with a finished product for a product which is not tracked.
The consumed field must be readonly in mrp_production_form_view view to avoid
to send to the server wrong value manually set.
opw:1861321
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/299ebb2cdf63de2e3967da0d2f3e7effd239812b
[IMP] mail: add moderation on channels
The commit above adds moderated channel. When a message is pending moderation,
it is not yet linked to the channel server-side, which is why there is a hack
to set `channel_ids` on the client side so that the message is visible on the
corresponding channel (only for author of message and moderator of channel).
It is only when the message is accepted that this message is linked to the
correct `channel_ids`. The server provides the updated list of channels that
this message is linked to, but it misses static channels that only make sense
on the client-side, such as "Inbox" or "Starred".
This commit solves the issue by only extending the list of channel registered
on the message when it is accepted, so that static channels are not unlinked
from the message.
Note that it is necessary to update `channel_ids` of the message,
because there could be "relay" channels. In other words, when the moderated
message is accepted, there could be more channels that contain this message.
Extension of commit c4f5b9f751
Instead of disabling only the button on which the user has clicked, we
disable all 'Add to Cart' buttons until the end of the transaction.
Closes#24853
opw-1858080
Backport following opw-1851612
[FIX] google_calendar: do not create an event with an invalid id
The id is useful to update existing events but sometimes we are getting some
ids that are not accepted by Google
Getting an error:
odoo.addons.google_account.models.google_service: Bad google request : {
"error": {
"errors": [
{
"domain": "global",
"reason": "invalid",
"message": "Invalid resource id value."
}
],
"code": 400,
"message": "Invalid resource id value."
}
}
Looks like existing events can have a _ in their id but new one, no longer.
It seems that these events are created by outlook calendar when synchronized
with Google Calendar.
On an optimization done for not rendering each time the template, the possibility
of sending the template in the proper language when multiple recipients was lost.
This is being refactoring in master, but for this version, Odoo won't merge a
change in the behavior, although it's the correct one as in previous versions.
Extracted by pedrobaeza from https://gist.github.com/nim-odoo/8a9749037370343f05c7e6681324f576
(cherry picked from commit 386a936)
When updating the reservation of an partially available or available
move line, use the current record of the loop and not the whole
recordset.
Closes#25445
The CSS of reconciliation highly uses `overflow: hidden` to hide
elements, but this cut the bottom part of the "Select a Batch Deposit"
list of deposits.
There is no possible overflow in this situation anyway, since in the
given circumstances the `max-height` is set to none.
opw-1859408
closes#25524
In some undertermined circumstances, a `KeyError` might appear in:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f9737d79e77e9abf634c8eaa4b6ea331e2aa814d/odoo/models.py#L4898-L4904
Despite the lack of reproducible use case, it seems that this was
introduced from 59b010ac36. In the meantime, other
optimizations were introduced in the prefetching of related fields, and
it seems that the fix is not necessary anymore.
Running the same script than described in
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/19536#issuecomment-333118947 , we
observe the following performances:
Before the fix:
```
On change with 10 lines (10 new, 0 existing) took 0.306
On change with 20 lines (10 new, 10 existing) took 0.221
On change with 30 lines (10 new, 20 existing) took 0.208
On change with 40 lines (10 new, 30 existing) took 0.271
On change with 50 lines (10 new, 40 existing) took 0.306
On change with 60 lines (10 new, 50 existing) took 0.319
On change with 70 lines (10 new, 60 existing) took 0.354
On change with 80 lines (10 new, 70 existing) took 0.382
On change with 90 lines (10 new, 80 existing) took 0.506
On change with 100 lines (10 new, 90 existing) took 0.503
```
After the fix:
```
On change with 10 lines (10 new, 0 existing) took 0.238
On change with 20 lines (10 new, 10 existing) took 0.259
On change with 30 lines (10 new, 20 existing) took 0.250
On change with 40 lines (10 new, 30 existing) took 0.233
On change with 50 lines (10 new, 40 existing) took 0.287
On change with 60 lines (10 new, 50 existing) took 0.325
On change with 70 lines (10 new, 60 existing) took 0.345
On change with 80 lines (10 new, 70 existing) took 0.451
On change with 90 lines (10 new, 80 existing) took 0.496
On change with 100 lines (10 new, 90 existing) took 0.423
```
The fix doesn't seem to be necessary anymore, so we go back to the
previous implementation of the computed field.
Closes#25448Fixes#19536
opw-1861468
Before this commit, something strange could happen after reloading a
settings form view: all 'sections' were displayed. The issue was caused
by the fact that the state of the view was read from the arch of the
form view at render time. Also, as a form of optimization (I suppose), the
settings did not call the initModules method twice, when it rerenders.
This is unfortunate, because the very same method is actually
responsible for removing unused sections.
This fix is the safe fix, but definitely not the perfect fix (this would
involve a larger change, something like reading the state from the arch once in
the view (factory), then only rendering what is necessary).
In the discuss composer on google chrome, when when the smileys have
more width than available, they stayed on one line and would increase
page size (adding an horizontal scrollbar).
This happened really easily in saas-11.3 because we have more smileys,
but still happened in 11.0 depending on the screen size.
opw-1861191
closes#25507
Co-authored-by: qsm-odoo <qsm@odoo.com>
When computing a salary sheet, a maximum recursion error could happen if there
is a cycle in the rules or in the categories.
Add constrains for salary rules and categories.
Closes#25405
- Store a token inside sessions to allow implicit session deactivation when needed.
backport of @da1f153d61d747d9357694382fe04f96c0ca886a @c8243e71c6da37547a19f61c58f25d5d03e13d38
Pierre Masereel