Since panel collapse became card collapse while migrating from BS3 to BS4 with
commit 59237ea819, it is impossible to open the card content.
Indeed, there was already data-parent attribut pointing to inexisting DOM
element. This was not an issue in BS3 but BS4 is not working with it.
closesodoo/odoo#30142
Since multi-website, we COW (copy on write) views when editing a view on a
website.
This is causing 2 issues related to module install/update:
1. During a module install, when creating an inherited view, it will create
that view as expected on the generic tree.
But that generic tree may not be used on website(s). Indeed, if the view
was edited, we are now using a copy of the view instead of the original
XML view (with an xml_id).
That copied view won't get the new inherited view in its view tree.
Now, we correctly copy the new view under every specific view tree (if
exists).
2. During a module update, when updating a view, it will only update the view
having the xml_id, so the generic one.
But most of the time, the generic view is not used as it was usually COW'd
and the specific view now replace the generic one.
Now, we also apply the update on the COW'd view. Note that only unmodified
field will be updated, this behavior basically mimic the noupdate behavior
on view's ir.model.data.
Step to reproduce for bug 1:
- Install website_sale module
- Go to a product page and then enter edit mode
- Make a modification to trigger COW, eg edit the information area under the
price "30-day money-back guarantee".
- Now install website_sale_comparison module
- The product page won't have the comparison button as the comparison view
inheriting the product view was created on the generic tree and not copied
on the specific tree (COW'd before the comparison module install).
Step to reproduce for bug 2:
- Repeat first 3 steps of bug 1
- Now make a modification in a view from the XML file in
website_sale_comparison module and update the module
- Only the view with the xml_id is updated, not it's COW'd views. This mean
that only the generic view is updated and not the specific one(s) really
used on the website.
task-1920487
closesodoo/odoo#29956
Before this commit, a generic view tree could be valid but impossible to copy
on a COW specific tree.
This was because when looping through inherit_children_ids to copy them, they
would be sorted by the ir.ui.view sort order (name, priority, id).
Indeed, when applying view inheritance and reading a view arch, children are
sorted by (priority, id).
Thus, if sorting the children by (name, priority, id) was different than
sorting by (priority, id) and the children view would conflict in that new
order, the COW would raise an error "can't find DOM element"
Step to reproduce:
- Create a parent view with just a DIV in arch
- Add a child view that add something inside that DIV
- Add another child view with a name alphabetically lower than the other
child and that replace the DIV by something else, like a SECTION
- Everything works as expected, when reading the parent view arch, the first
child is inserting something into the DIV and then the second is replacing
the DIV
- Now try to trigger the COW on the parent view by writing something on it in
a website context
- It will crash as the child views will be copied in another order, sorted
firstly by name.
- Indeed, when reading parent view, the second child will be copied first as
it's name is lower than the first, it will then replace the DIV by a SPAN.
When trying to copy the other child view that is supposed to insert
something into the DIV, the DIV will not be found and it will crash.
In the 'banner' snippet, there is a column using a white jumbotron
component. Those comes with a default background color so when using the
website builder to remove the white background, it did not go away;
it was replaced with the default background color (some gray).
This commit sets the default background color of jumbotron components to
'transparent'.
task-1889341
closesodoo/odoo#30099
`ref` could raise even if raise_if_not_found was False on `viewref`, now we
prevent that, and rely only on the exception on `viewref`.
Also, when not set to raise, the method could return None instead of a recorset.
PR: #29753
Since 12.0, some modal footer button order were changed. The primary button
would not be the one in the modal footer corner.
This is against bootstrap but more annoyingly, users are intuitively clicking
on the secondary button, ending up closing the modal and losing form
information they entered.
This commit simply fix the regression from 12.0 as before 12.0 these buttons
were positionned correctly.
Note that a commit in master (saas-12.2) will fix all the other ones that were
wrongly positionned before 12.0.
Step to reproduce:
- Go to an event having the possibility to register.
- Click on 'Register Now', a modal is shown to write details (name, email..)
- You intuitively click on 'Cancel' as it is the bottom right button
|________________________________ CONFIRM _ CANCEL _|
- The modal is closed, if you try to open it again your infos are lost
Closes#29884
task-1922120
Commit 68e9d5504c makes the redirection type mandatory, which is
logical. Since we can't add such a constraint in stable, we make the
field required in the view and assign a default value (in case the
module is not upgraded, which is very likely to be the case).
opw-1924983
closesodoo/odoo#30252
- Fix the position of 'Add to menu' toggle button in new page dialog
- Properly align tip icon in the welcome message
task-1895287
closesodoo/odoo#29403
Fine-tuning of commit b48d2b6b5e.
The call to unlink inside the unlink can recurse infinitely
in case there is a copy of a menu.
We replace that direct call by an accumulator so no recursion occurs.
opw 1922448closesodoo/odoo#30032
* = account, sale_management, website
Settings that are using groups internally should not appear on the user form
without using debug mode.
The admin should not get the idea that he should configure those per user,
because they are going to be reset if/when changing the general setting.
closes#29842
PR: #29860
With multi-website support, the key field is more important than ever as it
kind of replace the xml_id behavior.
Thus, on the ir.ui.view list view it is usefull to see the key.
closesodoo/odoo#29419
to ControlPanel/Search view refactoring.
The ControlPanel being now inside the DOM of client actions, those
existing widgets needed to be adapted (in the way they define if
and how they want a ControlPanel, and in the way the manipulate
their DOM as it slightly changed). Tests needed to be adapted as
well.
Part of task 1893568
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
*: tools, web, website, website_forum, mail, im_livechat
This commit refactors ir_http to make it more readable
and flexible.
Move the resize function of web/image to odoo.tools
Co-authored-by: XavierDo <xdo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Antony Lesuisse <al@openerp.com>
closes: #28563
task: #1908896
With multi-website, activating a customize option (customize_show view) will
actually duplicate the customize view to make it specific.
By doing so, the duplicated view will have a higher ID than the original, and
the original's siblings customize options.
Before this fix, two issues could be seen:
1. When toggling a customize option, it would appear last in the dropdown
afterward. This is because of the views being sorted by (priority, id)
(if the views have the same priority).
2. When toggling, sometimes the views header would be duplicated. This comes
from the JS code that loop through the returned views and create the DOM
by adding a header when the view inherit_id is different than the previous.
Obviously, as 2 views with the same inherit_id could not be grouped together
now that the specific one has a bigger ID, it will create twice the DOM.
=> Check tests in this commit, they have schemas that will explain it clearly
Note: We don't take priority into account for customize menu view order as it
would create the same problem as (2.)
We could have sorted by (inherit_id, priority, name) to avoid the issue
and give the user possibility to order options in header but it was
decided we dont.
Closes#29347
Before this comit:
The `_views_get()` method would be called recursively for every
`inherit_children_ids`.
At the end of the method, we would get the complete view hierarchy, including
duplicate hierarchies for website specific copies (COW).
Then, the `get_related_views` that is calling `_views_get()` would be overriden
in website module to keep only most specific views.
But this would not be enough as it would leave orphans from other trees:
- Have a base view 'B'
- That has an inherited view 'I'
- That has itself an inherited view 'II'
- Now make the hierarchy specific on a website from 'I'
- And add another inherited view to 'I' on the generic tree
This become:
B
/ \
/ \
I I'
/ \ |
II II2 II'
As explained, filtering duplicates would not be enough as it would correctly
remove 'I' and 'II' from the generic tree but would not remove 'II2'.
At the end, it would return "B", "II2", "I'" and "II'".
Now, we correctly return only "B", "I'" and "II'" by ignoring generic trees
when there is a specific one.
Closes#29347
In a particular case, `_views_get` was mixing apples and oranges, ir.ui.view
and theme.ir.ui.view.
This was the case if a theme has a theme.ir.ui.view t-calling another
theme.ir.ui.view.
(Only theme's sale bridge cause this issue, eg theme_kea_sale.products)
Then, having that theme installed on a website would make all other website
without that theme to crash when opening the /shop customize menu.
Indeed, the theme.ir.ui.view would have the xml_id theme_kea_sale.search.
The generic view `website_sale.products` would have `theme_kea_sale.products`
as inherit child which is website specific and t-call `theme_kea_sale.search`.
Then, on a website witout theme_kea installed, opening the customize menu would
call `get_related_views` that would call `_views_get` that would loop through
inherit children calling `_view_obj` that would not find a view with that key
and would fallback on self.env.ref, finding the theme.ir.ui.view.
Note: `_views_get` might return specific view for another website but that will
be filtered on `get_related_views` override in website.
Step to reproduce:
- Have at least 2 websites and website_sale installed
- Install theme_kea on a website, it will also install theme_kea_sale
- Go on the website that has not theme_kea installed
- Go to /shop
- Open Customize menu, it won't load because of python crash
opw-1914576
Closes#29347
When there is a website with traduction (for exemple, Spanish and
French). In the Spanish website, at the SEO menu, you can add keywords
using any of the languages (Spanish or French), but these keywords are
only added to the Spanish website.
To avoid misunderstanding between the website language and the keyword
language a tooltip is added.
closesodoo/odoo#29683
Now forum only allow to post message of type 'question'.
New 'modern' UI with Bootstrap 4
New moderation modal for bulk spam
Co-authored-by: qha <qha@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: qsm <qsm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: jke <jke@odoo.com>
Thanks to @qha-odoo for UI
Thanks to @qsm-odoo for reviewSsss
closesodoo/odoo#29235
Before this commit, the social media popover (used in forum but
available everywhere) may break over multiple rows if used on a relative
positioned small button. This however never occurred in standard <= 12.0
so we will consider this not a bug fix. This will however occur with
the upcoming forum refactoring, so we needed a fix for master.
This commit forces the social icons on one row and take the opportunity
to refactor the template to make a simpler and more beautiful popover
by using conventional icons and social media own colors.
closesodoo/odoo#29327
Lang / Context is implicitely added in the query using this._rpc
Before this commit if you set the title 'Title 1' for your website in the main
langage and after edit the title as "Title 2" in another language, it was the
main title that was replaced instead of the translation.
Now we use this._rpc that bind automatically the context and so the current lang
that we are editing.
closesodoo/odoo#29596
The translation had wrongly `</ i>` which from a report broke some
initialization of some snippet of the website editor.
es_CO, es_DO, es_EC languages are not available in transifex so this
change is done manually for them.
opw-1907752
closes#29135
Jeremy Kersten