Edit/create a bank account:
- Add a correct ABA number => nothing is displayed
- Add an incorrect number (e.g. with letters) => it crashes
Combining an `Integer` field with a `char` widget is just a bad idea...
opw-781069
Bad ISO 639-1 code
In 9.0 iso_code was guessed with `get_iso_codes` which was too simplistic
e.g. it_IT => it (correct) but ja_JP => ja_JP (incorrect)
Fixes tw:tashiropen/status/927779483041415168
On MS Windows, the mimetypes module relies on the Windows Registry to
guess mimetypes. As a consequence, when generating assets bundle for
javascript files, the mime type of js files may be wrong. In that
particular case, the Odoo user is facing an empty web page.
This commit enforce 'application/javascript' for js assets when they are
saved as ir_attachment in the database.
Since some calendar are in data, and their attendances
in an 'eval' with '0' ORM command, we need to put them
in noupdate mode to avoid duplicating attendances when
we update the module.
We chose to erase the partner_id and ref field on a picking when its
content may refer to multile records. Note that the partner_id field was
already hidden in the view of internal picking.
Use case to reproduce:
- Set a product to be expensed
- Set the expense_policy to something else than no
- Do a delivery order with a picking
- Validate the picking
-> Delivered quantity to 0 and impossible to create an invoice
if the invoice_policy is delivered_quantity
It happens due to this commit 48ea59d
What does it do:
- The move could be generated by an expense.
- If the move has 'no' as expense policy thus we won't add it in the invoice
Problem we can't guess if the move come from an expense or not (limitation).
This commit add an onchange on can_be_expense is order to set the expense
policy back to 'no' when the user uncheck it.
Courtesy of amoyaux
opw-777139
Before this commit:
1. The promo code form would be displayed in the cart popover (when you
mouseover the 'My Cart' menu in the navbar.)
2. The promo code form would appear twice at the 'Payment' step at the checkout
Now:
1. The promo code form is not displayed in the popover anymore
2. The promo code form will only be shown once at the checkout 'Payment' step
This closes#20539
As the windows package provides odoo from sources alongs with
python 3, the test of the build was failing.
The odoo-bin.exe was not found because py2exe is not used anymore.
Windows firewall is now disabled from package.py to prevent it
from blocking local xmlrpc calls.
Also, the docker containers were removed when package tests were
finished, even when no docker was involved in the process (e.g. only
a windows build).
This commit fixes the test part of the windows build process.
When opening the POS in this specific case:
- Under Mozilla Firefox
- auto printing the receipt is True
- invoicing is True
Before this commit, when issuing an invoice for a customer, a Traceback was thrown to the user and the invoice was not downloaded.
This was because the invoiced parameter resolved before the printing action was.
After this commit, we constain the invoiced parameter to be resolved when the action returns.
There is no traceback, and the invoice is downloaded
OPW 777647
closes#20570
- Create a tax:
Fixed amount: 10
Price included
- Add it by default to a product costing 100
- In a SO/PO/Invoice, add 2 units of the product
The total price is 210 instead of 200.
opw-779696
The `sale_stock.tour` failed in the case the admin was not
part of the group
`product.group_stock_packaging`
or the group
`sale.group_mrp_properties`
because then the sale order was working with the editable list,
which does not open a dialog,
while the test was relying on the dialog to be opened,
in order to close it.
The fix is simply to pass the fact to close the dialog if
there is none.
opw-779308
In Enterprise:
- Go in Settings > Technical > Mail > Templates
- Edit a template
- In the editor, upload an image
- Choose "Upload image without optimization"
You are sent back to the app switcher.
opw-778918
The inventory adjustment form is not suitable for large inventories.
First, a list view embedded in a form view is not convenient since it
doesn't provide any search capabilities. The user has to rely on the
search feature of the browser, which has restricted features in
comparison to the Odoo search field.
Then, the existing onchange mechanism coupled with computed fields
triggers heavy computations impacting all lines each time a single
line is modified. This leads to a hanging page for every inventory line
modification, which causes a non-negligeable loss of time.
This commit introduces a new tree view for inventory lines, accessible
thanks to a stat button on the inventory page. This button is available
in debug mode, if the inventory is in state 'Confirmed'. The tree view
contains the same fields than the tree view embedded in the form view,
without the flaws of the latter.
opw-760614
* [ADD] doc: iap tutorial
Should be easier to approach than the raw APIDoc.
contains:
- overview of the flow
- tutorial (coalroller) with guidelines
- technical description of objects/helpers
This view was introduced by rev[1] to be more adequate in the usecase
of the finished move line in mrp. A priority was not set and thus it
became the default view for stock move line, even in the stock
application. Moreover, it used a field only used in mrp in a domain
resulting traceback when displayed in the context of stock.
[1] f6c89de81eFixes#20610
Do not try to run `action_assign` on the next move if it is done or
cancelled. The issue is that `action_assign` will first unlink the
existing pack operations before creating new ones, and the system
forbids to unlink these ones.
To reproduce this issue:
1. Create a product, routes manufacturing and MTO
2. Create SO with that product
3. Go to DO and force assign then cancel the delivery
4. Go to Manufacturing order created and produce
opw 778897
In 7eab8e26d3 res.partner was converted
to the new API, at that point company_type was changed from a stored
field manually synchronised with is_company (through create/write
overrides) into a proper computed field.
However to make it "editable" it was simply marked as
"readonly=False", which means even though UI-wise it looks editable
editing it does not actually do anything (things work in the partners
form because there's also an onchange which updates is_company on the
fly).
Fix by implementing an inverse function and actually do this
correctly.
Fixes#20623
- Go to Maintenance Requests, Create
- Go to 'Equipment' field, 'Create and edit'
- Go to 'Product Information' tab
- Click on 'Vendor' field, 'Create and edit'
'Is a Vendor' field is False
opw-779200
Nicolas Martinelli