This commits refactors the code of the reconciliation, in order to facilitate the process of complex use cases, namely multi-currencies or cash-basis-taxes related (see details below). It also prepares the code for a second refactoring where we will save on each journal items the amount_currency and currency_id field (even in case of operation made in company currency), also in the sake of simplification.
1) Multi-currencies:
- the account.partial.reconcile model now will have dedicated columns to specify the amount of the partial reconciliation in the debit_line_id currency and the credit_line_id currency. That comes in handy when dealing with journal items having different secondary currencies, but also allows some simplification.
- residual_amount_currency computation changed accordingly
- moved models account.full.reconcile and account.partial.reconcile in their dedicated .py file
2) Cash basis taxes
- cash basis entries now handle correctly rounding errors to make sure the exact amount of gets reported when the reconciliation becomes full.
- the account for the base amount of cash basis entries has to be set, now, on the company instead of on each cash basis tax.
- that new 'property' field can be set at the CoA installation via the field property_cash_basis_base_account_id of account.chart.template, or going through the accounting settings.
Was task task: 2243420
Was PR #50308
Related: odoo/upgrade#1121
Related: odoo/enterprise#10252
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Use of the new control panel helpers to increase consistency and change the assertions
according to the new DOM/behaviour (e.g. components removed instead of turning invisible).
Part of task 2196029
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
This commit moves some step utils in a dedicated file and add new ones.
These steps will be very useful for the Main Flow Tour to avoid
duplicated code.
To do this, we also had to transform it into functions to allow
utils to call each other. Existing one are converted for
standardization purpose.
Note that 'WEBSITE_NEW_PAGE' wasn't considered as an util.
This is a very simple step only used twice.
The reason of this fix is that we reference some account accountant menu
in the invoicing menu and if you are not in enterprise version with
accounting installed, the tours don't work.
The tours are adapted for each versions.
closesodoo/odoo#39104
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Task 2034073
The reconciliation widget is now entirely part of the enterprise version
as it is an advanced accounting feature
closesodoo/odoo#38424
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Before this commit, the account_render_report tour assumed that
account_accountant was installed on any enterprise database.
Now, the account_accountant steps are only inserted in the tour
when the module is installed.
closesodoo/odoo#38963
X-original-commit: a45a4b6cc3249320969c8ba3324aad9e7c1aab67
Signed-off-by: Julien Mougenot (JUM) <Arcasias@users.noreply.github.com>
Have a reconciliation model that applies to some particular journals
And that will match some of those journals' lines
The field journal should be filled too
(this field is only the default journal that a proposition will be filled with)
Open the reconciliation widget on a given journal, within the list of
possible journal (from the account dashboard)
Before this commit there was a crashed. This was caused by the fact that
one of the lines that should be displayed had a reconcile model that was not fetched beforehand
After this commit, there is no crash as all relevant reconcile
models are fetched
Note that, on reconcile models, the field journal_id is just there to prefill
the propositions it will create
corrects commit e5c8071484
OPW 2084942
closesodoo/odoo#38836
X-original-commit: c285d578cc497044e819c62d42373c29f87b1e93
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Renamed xml ids of the main accounts (in prepartion for a future multi l10n
demo system). Change account numbering to match quickbook and other US GAAP
convention and recommendations.
closesodoo/odoo#37606
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Previously when opening the manual reconciliation widget with several lines, trying to put the focus on another line by clicking on the grey line was not working due to a o_field_widget with the partner name taking all the line and there is an event on that o_field_widget that stop the propagation of the event.
Also changing the partner value was only changing the value in the grey zone and not in the other field.
Therefore as it was strange to have twice the name of the partner display one above another and that it was causing problem for the focus of the widget. We removed the name of the partner that was readonly (leaving the editable field where we can change it) and we replaced it with the name of the account which makes more sense.
closesodoo/odoo#36881
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert (csn) <csn@openerp.com>
* When clicking on the partner m2o selection field before having clicked on the bank statement line, 2 events occured:
* the bank statement line expanded
* the partner selection showed
This could lead to unwanted behavior as the renderer could update
-> Stop the propagation of a click on .o_field_widget to prevent
flickering and possible update of the statement line widget
* Always recompute the create line as sometimes the value is not correct
when removing a proposition
closesodoo/odoo#36322
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Task 2039772
Add a new amount matching mode by taking the amount from the label, based on a regex. The regex must contain a capture group. If multiple groups are matched, there will be an error.
Also add a 'remaining' option for the second line, that puts the remaining amount of the statement in the second line.
closesodoo/odoo#35143
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Part of task 2039772
The second line of reconciliation models (client side) was computed based on the amount of the bank statement instead of the remaining balance, like on the server side.
We also need it to be based on the remaining balance, for the next commit introducing the detection of the amount thanks to a regex on the commuication of the statement.
Task 36284
Change the visual aspect of the reconciliation widget:
* Use a tab system to change modes
* Matching for receivable/payable (and liability)
* Matching for types not above
* Create a new line
* Batch Payment
* Sale Order
* Add a keyboard navigation
* Improve the search bar and use a real search view to do so
* Remove the constraint that prevent to select a line already selected
on another statement. Instead remove it when a reconciliation is
validated
* The lines already proposed are proposed last on other statement
lines
* Put the lines with exact amount matching first in the propositions
* Improve when Rainbowman shows
* Change the order of the propositions: older show first
* Remove the title on top of the view (and the ability to edit it)
* Fix some breadcrumb issues
* Also add lines from receivable/payable without partners in the manual
reconciliation widget.
* Propose things to do if there are no lines found in the manual
reconconciliation
closesodoo/odoo#32631
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
-- Create a new bank statement;
-- Add a transaction;
-- Reconcile;
-- Create a write-off with tax.
Before this commit, the tax journal item's label only contains the name
of the tax.
Now, the tax journal item's label contains the write-off label and the
tax's name. This is the same behaviour as it was in version 11
(https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/11.0/addons/account/models/account_move.py#L1259).
opw-2025480
closesodoo/odoo#35348
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
Activate analytic tags
Create an reconciliation model on which you set at least one tag
Create a bank statement and a line
Click on reconcile (or access the reconciliation widget by another means)
Quick Create a writeoff line
Click on the button corresponding to the reconciliation model
Before this commit:
The many2many tags was buggy, there was one empty tag, corresponding to nothing
clicking on the field triggered errors
validating the reconciliation by clicking on reconcile triggered a server traceback
in the real backend, opening the tag form view triggered an access error
This was because the data were not formatted the right way to be passed to the m2m_tag_field through
notifyChanges
After this commit, the reconciliation model's tag renders and behaves well
Validating the reconciliation works
OPW 2033350
As a side note, in the future, the reconciliation widget Model should fully implement basicModel
or not at all. Some of the heavy plumbing that the ReconciliationModel does (fetch records, data...)
is imitating what fetchRecord does
closesodoo/odoo#34838
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
The goal of the to_check checkbox in the reconciliation widget is to set the to_check field present on the move that will be created. However since the UI is not perfect, the to_check checkbox was added on the wizard when we create a new line in the widget, which cause the following problem: what if we select to_check on line1 and then deselect it on line2, previously it was not possible to do this, a warning was thrown to tell the user that he had some line with to_check set and some other not. A better way to do this, and more user friendly is by preventing the user from deselecting the checkbox if some other line has the to_check value set.
closesodoo/odoo#33956
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert (csn) <csn@openerp.com>
The function get_all_data_for_manual_reconciliation got an empty list instead of None. This leads to not query the db. However we want to get results in the default behavior for get_all_data_for_manual_reconciliation
closesodoo/odoo#33711
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert (csn) <csn@openerp.com>
As we now have a new debug mode 'tests' which load a new asset bundle
containing tour-test files, we moved those files to a new folder hierarchy.
That will clean the .js files trees.
Also, those files should be included in the new asset.
Basically, the .js tour files (not test) should be inside /static/src/js/tours
while .js tour test files (test=true) should be inside /static/tests/tours next
to QUnit tests, inside a tours folder.
+ test_new_api: don't run the test in debug assets
task-1934445
Comes with https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/4281Closes#33213
This commit adds a new parameter on fields for list view and one2many.
The parameter name is "optional" and its values are "hide" or "show".
Columns of the list view which have the optional parameter set are
listed in a dropdown that can be toggled from the last cell of the
table header. The ones with optional set to "hide" are hidden by
default.
User choice is stored in local storage. If no saved parameter can be
found in local storage then the default value from the view is used.
Due to the overflow behavior of the responsive table, we were forced
to wrap the table-responsive div in yet another div. We changed the
o_list_view class on the table to o_list_table in order to reuse
the more generic o_list_view class on the top-most div. CSS rules
and selectors had to be updated according to this change.
Task-1902765
Purpose
=======
Fields `customer` and `supplier` on `res.partner`
are mostly used in domains of many2x fields.
Those domains can confuse end users because they don't
see the partner they are looking for; and it's not obvious why.
Some identified problems:
1. It can lead to duplicated partners: the user does not find
the partner, so he creates a new one.
2. The user imports supplier contacts in the Contacts app, so they
don't get the `supplier` flag. Then the user wants to make a purchase order,
and cannot find the new suppliers in the list
3. A user removes the customer flag on a prospect, because they don't think
it's a customer yet - except now they can't make a quote for that customer...
Specification
=============
Remove the two mentioned fields.
Since fields `customer` and `supplier` have been removed, all partners
are now shown in many2one dropdowns.
But in some cases, not all partners are relevant or some are more likely
to be relevant than others. e.g. when creating a PO, top suppliers have a
higher priority than other partners.
So, adapt the places where those fields were used with the new mechanism to
display the searched the partners, according to the number purchase/sales
orders they made.
TaskID: 2031147
Co-authored-by: Yannick Tivisse <yti@odoo.com>
The onboarding modal for setting up the few base fields of a company
has now been moved to a wizard
It is accessible from the general settings, but also in the onboarding
section of sale and account modules.
The following company settings are editable with that wizard:
- Set report **layout**:
The user can chose the overall look of the report. The current choices
are : *Standard* (default), *Background*, *Boxed* and *Clean*.
- Set company **logo**:
Changes the company logo.
- Set report **colors**:
The user can set the primary and secondary colors of the report through
a newly added widget allowing to pick a custom color.
When changing the **logo**, colors are automatically set to its most dominant
colors.
> A "Reset colors" button also triggers the color calculation.
- Set report **font**:
Changes the overall font of the report. Only Google Fonts are used
for enhanced compatibility.
- Company **tagline**, also called "header"
- **Footer**
- **Paper format**
- Report **preview**:
A mockup of a final report
Automatically updates when changing **layout**, **logo**, **colors** or **font**
Co-authored by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
closesodoo/odoo#33863
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
- Open the bank reconciliation widget
- Throttle the connection
- Click multiple times on the same move line in order to select it
The line is added multiple times to the statement line.
We mitigate the behavior thanks to a `debounce`.
Fixes#33000
opw-1978551
closesodoo/odoo#33020
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
The old tree views don't really exist anymore, this odd pseudo-flag to
dispatch between "list" and "tree" tree views has no reason to remain.
Task 1937686
closesodoo/odoo#31243
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Deprecated accounts are available in the reconciliation widget, while
they shouldn't be.
opw-1949667
opw-1945585
closesodoo/odoo#32304
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Laurent Smet