This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
Purpose
=======
Fields `customer` and `supplier` on `res.partner`
are mostly used in domains of many2x fields.
Those domains can confuse end users because they don't
see the partner they are looking for; and it's not obvious why.
Some identified problems:
1. It can lead to duplicated partners: the user does not find
the partner, so he creates a new one.
2. The user imports supplier contacts in the Contacts app, so they
don't get the `supplier` flag. Then the user wants to make a purchase order,
and cannot find the new suppliers in the list
3. A user removes the customer flag on a prospect, because they don't think
it's a customer yet - except now they can't make a quote for that customer...
Specification
=============
Remove the two mentioned fields.
Since fields `customer` and `supplier` have been removed, all partners
are now shown in many2one dropdowns.
But in some cases, not all partners are relevant or some are more likely
to be relevant than others. e.g. when creating a PO, top suppliers have a
higher priority than other partners.
So, adapt the places where those fields were used with the new mechanism to
display the searched the partners, according to the number purchase/sales
orders they made.
TaskID: 2031147
Co-authored-by: Yannick Tivisse <yti@odoo.com>
This commit allow gaining a badge at the end of a certification survey if succeeded.
The badge can be configured on the survey if the certification mode is activated.
The badge is linked directly to the survey and not the challenge,
because it makes more sense to configure directly the reward on the survey and
not the way to gain this reward. As the way is always the same.
Only one badge can be set on the certification survey.
Only the name, description, image and badge level can be configured.
The rest of badge configuration is automatically set to correspond to the use case.
When a badge is configured on a certification survey, the needed challange, goal
and challenge line are autogenerated.
The badge is available on the user's profile page if he gained it.
Once the badge is configured on the survey, he cannot be changed
(remove + create new one), only modified (badge attributes edition).
The only way to remove the badge is to uncheck 'certification_give_badge'.
When removing the badge from the certification survey, all the autogenerated
records (at badge creation) are deleted to avoid ghost records (as they have
no purpose outside of this context). If the badge is owned by someone, the badge
is only archived. If nobody owns the badge, the badge is deleted.
Survey users now have the right to create badges but not challenges or goals.
All the autogenerated records are handled in sudo, to allow the survey user
to configure a badge on their survey.
Note : To avoid having to rewrite the complete context in an xpath expression
only to display the certification badge on the user's profile page,
the default website_published value of the certification badge is defined
directly in the survey module even if survey does not depend of website.
This attribute will be ignored until website module is installed.
Task ID : 1935136
Closes PR #31486
Stages modification through the clickable statusbar wasn't very intuitive.
By fixing default behavior through states (and corresponding buttons), default user experience is simplified.
3 static states available : draft, open, closed
Form view: navigation through states with buttons
Kanban view: disabled modification of survey state
Task ID : 1949110
closesodoo/odoo#32325
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Before this commit, the syntax to start a tour was extremely verbose.
With this new method, it is possible to start a tour by just giving the
essential parameter: the tour name.
The full set of features from browser_js are kept by using **kwargs.
closesodoo/odoo#32316
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
Task #1902306
Purpose
=======
The "page" concept is now only present in the user interface.
Surveys are split in "sections" that have two purposes:
- Organizing a (long) survey/certification
- Allow to pick a random questions count for that section (more information here after)
On the user interface, based on the questions_layout field, surveys are displayed:
- On a single page, where sections still appear but are only used as visual separations
- On multiple pages, having one page per section (this matches the previous behavior)
- On multiple pages, having one page per *question*
On top of that page concept, this commit added randomization for the survey questions.
The randomization mechanism will take X questions per section of the survey.
The survey.user_input is initialized with the selected questions to be sure to keep that
set of questions and avoid showing a new set of questions every time the user refreshes the page.
This also allows to easilly go back and know which question we have to show.
Task #1902306
Purpose
=======
This commit adds certification capabilities to the survey module.
A certification is a survey with the "certification" flag set to true than can be linked
to a certification email template that contains a certification document (PDF).
This template can be edited by the user in the technical settings to customize the certification email/document.
To be able to implement this certification concept, we also have to add scoring mechanisms to surveys.
survey.questions of type 'simple_choice' and 'multiple_choice' now have scores for the suggested answers.
These question scores allow to compute a global score that is used to determine whether the user has successfully
passed the certification or not.
As additional features, we also have:
- A time limit with an interface timer that limits the test to X minutes
When reached, the survey is automatically submitted and unregistered (= unsubmitted) answers are not taken into account.
- A limited number of attempts for the survey/certification
If reached, the user can't take the survey/certification anymore
The 'survey result' layout was adapted accordingly to show the success rate of participants and the correct answers
to the survey questions.
Specs
=======
- Create a new survey :
- Add a description field for the survey
- Options on a survey :
- Passing score : (sum of all good answers) in %
- If No scoring => No passing score, no certificate
- If Scoring with answers => Passing score and can see the answers (can create certificate)
- If Scoring without answers => Passing score but can't review the answers at the end (can create certificate)
- for the questions, if "no scoring" selected, can 't see the option "good answer" and "score" on the questions
- If the 2 others options, can see the options "good answer" and "score" on the questions
- all the types of questions are available for each option.
- Questions
- Add the option correct answer on the multiples questions (one or more good answers)
- Certifications
- If scoring, force "mandatory" for "mutliple choices (1or multiple answers)"
- On the dashboard => visual information that this specific survey is a certification
- Time Limit : The student is informed on the home screen of the survey of the time limit.
The clock start when he clicks on "start survey"
- Template of the certificate : send email with attachment PDF
- Front-end :
- Add some margin
- Replace "Back to survey" with the blue-bar from the portal
- Add a timer (start when the survey starts)
- Add a progress bar (number of section and number of question inside the section)
- Analyse of the results :
- First a global graph with the number of people who''ve participated and passed the test
- Stages of a survey :
- Remove the stage "Permanent"
- 3 stages :
- draft : not on-line but can be tested (with phantom token)
- In progress : on-line
- closed : not on-line
- Who can test a survey : the manager and the user. Add this condition to the phantom token.
Task #1902306
Purpose
=======
survey.question is now also the model used for the survey's pages (with the "is_page" field set to True).
This allows to put all the pages and questions together in a o2m field on the view side and
easily reorganize your survey by dragging the items around.
It also removes one level of encoding by directly having 'Add a page' and 'Add a question'
links on the tree view of questions, enabling a faster encoding.
However, this has the downside of making the code reading a little bit more complicated.
Efforts were made at the model level to create computed fields so that the use of these models
still seems somewhat logical. That means:
- A survey still has "page_ids" (question_and_page_ids filtered on is_page = True)
- These "page_ids" still have question_ids (questions located between this page and the next)
- These "question_ids" still have a "page_id"
That makes the use and display of these information at view and controller levels easier to understand.
Purpose of this merge is to improve access mode and authentication management
introduced at 9771fdfe8f . Purpose of this cleaning is to simplify options and make
them clearer. Instead of a selection with 4 entries we propose to use two
fields on survey model :
* access_mode: everyone with a public link can access and answer; or only
invited people;
* login required: whether people have to login to answer or not;
All main use cases are covered with combination of those two options.
This commit is linked to task ID 1932508 and PR #30508.
Purpose of this commit is to use an access token to access survey instead
of their ID. Routes are updated to use that token instead of the survey ID.
Purpose is to have less discoverable routes and be able to control a bit more
survey access even if it is not really a security parameter.
Some renaming is performed to avoid confusion in terms. Survey token and
answer token are now clearly labeled differently in the code to know which
model we are working on.
Some templates are updated to directly use the answer as base record to
have access to token and test_entry fields instead of giving those parameter
values directly in the controller. It makes some more diff but also allow
easier edition and improvement in templates when having directly survey
and answer record available.
This commit is linked to task ID 1932508 and PR #30508.
Purpose is to clean and simplify invite wizard on surveys. Main purpose is
to simplify options.
Public link is displayed for public surveys, allowing to quickly share
it. When sending emails a token is now generated for each recipient. There is
no "batch public link" sending option anymore as it is not really necessary.
Check is done on recipients and emails to match the access mode option. Having
a restricted survey gives the same limitations on people to invite (users,
employees, ...).
Code is cleaned to ease its understanding and prepare future evolution notably
with appraisals.
An existing mode field is added on invite model. All options are currently
not used but it prepares future addition to survey, notably for certifications.
Its purpose is to know what to do with existing tokens when inviting new
recipients. It is used notably to resend tokens through the user_input form
view instead of relying on a custom context key.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911586 and PR #28986.
In this commit we extend access option on survey model. Access mode is now
defined as
* public: everyone can access this survey. People having a link to the survey
can create answers and fill survey. Those are used for example as
satisfaction surveys;
* login required: only users can access this survey. Depending on auth
signup configuration this either limits survey access or forces people
to create an account;
* employees only: only users belonging to base.group_user can access this
survey. Those are used for example for internal polls;
* on invitation only: only people receiving a token can access this survey.
They do not need to be an user, having a token is sufficient. Those are
used for example for appraisals;
Note that survey officers and managers can always create and update answers
according to their ACLs.
In this commit we also improve a bit survey form view while changing the
access field. Surveys users now have access to all buttons and some labels
have been updated to better fit current Odoo style. Archive button is now
always displayed as it is considered as a standard way of managing surveys.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911586 and PR #28986.
Purpose of this commit is to improve test coverage of survey module. This
commit adds tests related to current access and serve as a base for future
modification. Some tests are commented as access will evolve for this
application.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911586 and PR #28986.
Purpose of this commit is to adapt controllers and routes to new ACLs. As
survey access is now controlled routes have to use survey ID and browse
records as sudo when access is granted.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911586 and PR #28986.
This commit holds several improvements on survey models.
[IMP] re-order fields in survey models and update strings / helps
Purpose is to ease understanding and future modifications of survey models
by reordering fields in survey, question and user input models. Those are the
main models we want to clean in future updates.
Some comments have been moved into help and some labels and helps have been
updated to clarify a bit the use of various fields, notably in question model.
No functional or technical change occur with this commit. It is just pure
code move. Reordering them allow to already understand a bit more the logic
of this module.
[REF] survey: remove unnecessary/unused fields on answer models
Purpose of this commit is to remove unnecessary and/or unused fields on survey
answer line model. In this commit we
* remove useless date_create field on answer and answer lines models. This
field is basically a renamed create_date. Let us remove this dummy field
as it adds nothing to the answer and answer lines models;
* remove useless URL-related fields and actions on answer and answer lines
models. Having those fields actually bloats the model without really helping
understanding survey models. As changing routes should not occur frequently
hiding routes in fields does not really help. Templates are update to
directly include links instead of fields;
We also remove a button on user input that redirects to the survey global
results. Surveys results are available on survey kanban and form views. It
makes no sense to have that kind of button on a specific answer.
[REF] survey: remove unnecessary/unused fields on survey models
Purpose of this commit is to remove unnecessary and/or unused fields on survey
model. In this commit we
* remove useless is_designed field on survey model. We remove is_designed
field that is based on having page and/or questions. It is just used to
make some links inactive in kanban view. Having fields just for that
purpose bloats the model and is not necessary. Testing void surveys will
just lead to a void page;
* remove useless email_template_id field on survey model. This field is
completely not used anywhere in survey codebase;
* remove useless urls field in survey model. In this commit we remove support
of both relative and global urls computation. It was used only in invite
wizard but was actually not really necessary as knowing the survey access
url is the only really necessary thing to display;
* Print and results URLs are removed from survey model. Having them inlined
directly in code is simpler that actually hiding them behind field. As
changing routes should not occur often it is not a big deal to write them
when necessary. We therefore remove public_url_html, print_url and
result_url fields;
This commit is linked to task ID 1911586 and PR #28986.
Purpose of this commit is to ease understanding or routes. In this commit
we make token a parameter where it is optional and force is where it is
not; we remove unnecessary list on routes; we rename some controller methods
to ease understanding;
Code calling those URLs is adapted accordingly. No functional change should
occur with this commit.
Some routes are json-http-mixed as a result of old implementation. Those
will be updated in future tasks when cleaning the templates and routes.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911586 and PR #28986.
Purpose of this commit is to provide a new simpler survey as demo data in
survey application. Current survey is about Odoo use which is not coherent
with the demo data set used currently in Odoo. It is now a survey about
ecommerce use with an example of each different questions.
Survey tour is updated accordingly. It now uses a standard routing instead
of the test route. Indeed purpose of tests is to use real life use case
not corner case like testing capabilities of survey application.
This commit is linked to task ID 1912228 and PR #29303.
Currently surveys tours are launched starting from / . However on this page
survey assets are not launched meaning ready code for survey tours is never
true.
Correctly setting base URL to be on a page loading survey assets unlocks the
ready code computation and allow to launch tests from command line notably.
This commit is related to task ID 1915356 and PR #29264.
Purpose of this commit is to add a test working with routes and controllers
that check the flow of people going through the portal to fill surveys.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911238 and PR #28831.
Purpose of this commit is to clean existing tests in survey. This commit
* removes unnecessary tests checking that basically create / write correctly
works;
* removes tests based on implementation details;
* cleans tests for validation and answer creation to make them more easier
to read and understand;
* moves invitation tests into their own file;
Some helpers methods are added in common.py to ease question and answer
creation.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911238 and PR #28831.
Purpose of this commit is to add some prepared data in survey common test
file. We also add some tool methods in order to easily create new questions,
answers and answer lines. Some specific assert methods are also added to
avoid noise in tests and avoid having to duplicate some check and assertions.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911238 and PR #28831.
Purpose of this commit is to clean a bit survey test files before updating
them and creating new tests. In this commit we add a common file holding
user creation and we use the recently-introduced tool method to create
test users. Survey test class is done child of SavepointCase to use
breakpoints and avoid recreating data at each test.
Future commits will gradually remove unnecessary content for test_survey.py,
rewrite part of it to be easier to understand and add new tests.
This commit is linked to task ID 1911238 and PR #28831.
Purpose is to have a somehow cleaner name for this wizard as its purpose
is to send invitations. Email and composer are details on how it works.
This commit is linked to task ID 1909804 and PR #28783.
Purpose of this commit is to rename type column to something matching the
the real business use of the field. That way it is easier to find and grep
in the code. It also lessens potential conflicts with type build-in python
function. It also lessens conflicts when using the field in JS as type
is a build-in attribute.
Renaming type column is a long-living issue. We choose to do it at the
beginning of the v13 development to catch errors as soon as possible.
This commit is linked to task ID 1896245. It is also a subpart of community
PR #27599.
This commit adds possibility to add a notification layout when sending
an email in survey using their specific composer. Purpose of this task is to
allow to send some technical template-based emails using the default
notification layouts defined in mail. It allows to avoid redefining the whole
layout in the template itself. This way email body content is simpler.
This commit is linked to task ID 1843224 (and 1868112) and to PR #25313
(and #25889).
Purpose: When running tests, all the tests for the installed/updated
files are done. This commit adds a 'tagged' decorator that can be used to
tag tests. Combined with a new 'test-tags' CLI option, it adds the ability
to filter which tests are executed. For example, @tagged('slow') will
add a tag 'slow' to the test. The CLI option 'test-tags="slow"' will
only run tests tagged 'slow'.
One can use prefixes to select cases with tags.
'+' or no prefix means that the tests tagged with this tag are selected
for execution. '-' prefix will exclude the tests tagged with this tag.
Exclusion takes precedence over inclusion.
Also, by default, all Odoo tests cases are tagged 'standard' and with
the technical name of the module.
This means that when selecting tests with the 'test-tags'
parameter, if '-standard' is not specified, all tests tags are
going to be executed.
When tagging tests, one can remove such automatic tag by prefixing the
tag name with '-'. E.g. @tagged('-standard') will remove the standard
tag from the test.
Another example, if one wants to test the 'sale' module alone,
even without adding any 'tagged' decorator thos tests can be selected
like that: --test-tags="sale"
Tests are selected or deselected using a TagsSelector. When instanciated,
a string is passed with comma separated tests selectors like
'+slow,-standard'. When the 'check' method is called with a test as argument,
it returns True or False if the test has to be executed or not.
Now that we're closer to switching to P3 for good, these helpers have
outlived their usefulness, and mostly add noise.
All remaining dict.iter*() or dict.view*() must be converted to the
normal keys(), values() or items() calls.
Whenever the result is likely to be used for more than the scope of a
loop, or when the dict needs to be modified during iteration, the calls
must be wrapped in a ``list()``, to protect the new P3 semantics.
Those cases are very exceptional.
Also removed some dead code or improved the API to remove unnecessary
conversions.
- ask questions about "Dates", not "Datetimes" anymore
- display dates according to website language
Thanks to Kinjal Mehta and Ravi Gadhia who contributed to this commit.
Slug and unslug API is now available in http_routing. Indeed there is no
link to any website or any reason to not support slufigied URLs when
website is not installed. A new unslug_url method is added as a tool
coming from an embedded method from website. Doing it allows to have all
slug related methods defined at the same point.
Support of slug and unslug in qweb rendering is also moved directly in
http_routing version of ir_ui_view instead of website inheritance. This
is done in order to keep things coherent.
Some code from website about ModelConverter is also moved. Indeed both
versions of ir_http uses some kind of placeholder to store the uid
when converting urls to python. This commit unifies it by using the
website one directly in base to simplify the override.
This commit also updates all module importing slug. Enterprise modules
will have to be updated, see related commit.
In Python 3, all of these were "consolidated" under urllib(.request,
.parse, .errors) which is inconvenient.
Since we already have hard dependencies on requests and
werkzeug(.urls, which is a backport of Python 3's unicode-aware
urllib.parse) migrate *everything* to that.
A sticking point is urllib2.URLError, those were (mostly) replaced by
the slightly more general IOError which URLError extends.
In Python 3:
* various builtins and dict methods were changed to return
view/iterable objects rather than lists
* and the separate Python 2 view/iterable builtins and methods were
removed altogether
This is problematic when using these items as list (which the happens
repeatedly in Odoo), but more viciously when iterating *multiple times*
over them (which also happens, which I've messed up multiple times while
writing this, and which is a pain to debug even when you've just created
the issue).
Convert all code using these to semantics-matching cross-version
helper functions to get the LCD behaviour between P2 and P3, and
forbid the builtins via lint.
issue #8530
Several modules defines records with the external ID `base.foo_bar` while it is
created inside this module (typically menus and groups).
While there is no technical reasons to do so but this may introduce issues:
- these records will not be deleted during uninstall
- if a language is loaded before the installation of the module, it won't be
translated
The uninstallation will only remove the records with an external id linked to
this module (these would only be removed when removing base).
Installing a language before the module will drop the translations not linked
to an existing external id (as it can not be resolved).
This commit correct all the external ids tagged as from base or other incorrect
modules.
This commit remove required alias on res.users model. It also removes the
inheritance of mail.alias.mixin. The field alias_id is kept and allow people
to use aliases on users if they want. However there is no default void alias
created for each user anymore.
Default from of mail.message does not use user alias anymore. Indeed this
creates issues with aliases not being correctly configured and can be
confusing compared to private channels. Using user aliases is therefore
now done manually instead of being a default behavior.
Raphael Collet