-In the action menu, the manager has no rights to delete the scrap order thus
added the access rights for the manager in the main csv file.
task-1959647
Since
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e88fe6f380ed5682f2cedad16ba13ca43a3828c2
, the groups to have access to pricelists is `group_product_pricelist`,
not `group_sale_pricelist` anymore.
`group_sale_pricelist` is now a technical group enabling access to
advanced pricelist rules (percentage/discount).
When making a test import for new users, there don't be present
in DB, so the computation of the customer/supplier rank will raise
an error.
Manage the case when user is not yet present in DB.
closesodoo/odoo#35955
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
During an HttpCase, when a browser_js test is finished, cookies are
removed to ensure that the next call will start on a clean base. From
time to times, when an HttpCase have multiple tests methods that call
browser_js, the user session of the previous test is being used.
With this commit, the session cookie is explicitely deleted and should
prevent that kind of problem. By the way, the browser's cache is also
cleared.
When issuing the first json command, it happens that the chrome process
has crashed. As a consequence, a log entry appears with saying that it
could not connect to chrome debugger.
After some investigations, it appeared that it was only happening with
google-chrome versions 75.0.3770.90 and 74.0.3729.169.
This error message was seen on the chrome stderr:
listp->slotinfo[cnt].gen <= GL(dl_tls_generation).
As a conclusion, it seems that we were hit by this issue:
https://github.com/GoogleChrome/puppeteer/issues/2207
While this commit does not fix the google-chrome issue, it adds a new
verification to check if google-chrome process is running before trying
to issue the json command. If it's not case, an error message is logged
with the error code.
After a browser_js, http requests threads are joined. If one of them
doesn't finish gracefully, a dumpstacks occurs.
As the dumpstacks call is in a loop, it can quickly polute logs. Even
more, a the dumptack may include threads that were not yet processed and
that will be joined in a future loop.
With this commit, dumpstacks will be called once and for all at the end
of the method, if at least one thread is remaining.
Furthermore, before this commit a sleep of 0.5 sec occured at most ten
times for each thread before considering it as lost. It means that each
thread is benefiting of the cumumulated time of the previous ones.
That's not fair.
With this commit, a default timeout of 10 sec is used for all threads.
The original warning is kept for each remaining request.
* disable background networking like GoogleUrlTracker ...
see https://codereview.chromium.org/3312014
* disable backgrounding occluded windows is a CLI swith that was
specifically written for tests to avoid non deterministic behavior. To
avoid test flakiness, it should come with disable renderer-backgrounding
and disable background-throttling as stated here:
https://github.com/smooth-code/jest-puppeteer/issues/137
* disable breakpad is used to disable crash reporting, the difference
with disable crash-reporter is not clear.
see https://peter.sh/experiments/chromium-command-line-switches/
* disable defaults-apps, prevent installation of default apps on the
first run
* disable dev-shm usage that may cause crashes
Undeterministic failures "Cannot connect to chrome"
can occurs in two scenarios:
-One time on a build, occasinnaly. This seems to be linked to chrome version.
runbots using version 71 don't have this problem when it occurs on runbot
with version 74 and 75.
-For all (36) attemps of the build to connect to chrome debugger,
this is exeptionnal but add a lot of noise by adding this type of
failure on any runbot.
Used chrome versions at this time:
r11-r22 -> 71.0.3578.98
r23-r24 -> 74.0.3729.169
r25-r28 -> 75.0.3770.90
All 'Could not connect' failure by runbot by day
day r13 r20 r24 r25 r26 r27 r28
07-15 36 4 2
07-16 6 1 1
07-17 36 2 1 2 2
07-18 2 39 1 2
07-19 1 3 1 3
07-20 1
07-21
07-22 2 1 4 1
07-23 1 1 1
07-24 4 3 2 1
07-25 2 5 2
07-26 3 3 1 1
07-27
07-28
07-29 36 1 1 1
07-30 3 1
07-31 1 3 2 1
08-01 3 1 1
08-02 3 1 1 1
08-03 1
08-04
08-05 1 5 4 1
08-06 1
08-07 2 1 2
08-08 2 2 2 1
08-09 2 2
08-10
08-11 1
08-12 2 1 4 3
08-13 1 2 1 2 72
Back2basics changed the context in the views and actions from
`type_tax_use` into `default_type_tax_use`, but also changed the one
used in the domain of a field which caused a traceback
closesodoo/odoo#35998
Signed-off-by: Romain Libert (rli) <rli@odoo.com>
In order to display some stats on survey's card (in the kanban view), the survey's card has been reorganized:
We remove all the button present in the bottom of the card, button concerned are:
• analyze answers
• test
• share
We recreate the button "share" in the dropdown menu of the card.
We add the next information:
- For each survey with scoring, the number of people who passed the test is displayed as well as the success rate.
- For each survey with scoring and certification, a certification icon is displayed and the string "passed" (corresponding to the number of people who passed the test) bec$
TASK-ID : 2045617
closesodoo/odoo#35479
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
The commit c429c0e0bd removed context keys that were used to expand the view
The the commit 98a55917a6 fixed that
The the commit 9bc4a19d74 reintroduced
it (prob. bad rebase)
This commit re fixes that.
closesodoo/odoo#35977
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
This PR improves the display of editable of list views.
Instead of always hardcoding column widths depending of the field types, we let
the browser compute them as much as possible, i.e. as soon as there are records,
and we then freeze the widths s.t. it doesn't flicker when switching a row in edition.
However, we keep the fixed widths heuristic when there is no record to display, as
in this case the browser doesn't have enough information to compute the widths.
In the latter case, we also tweaked the heuristic s.t. all field types having a relative
width now have the same width factor (i.e. the available space is uniformly shared
between them).
Task 2011587
closesodoo/odoo#35801
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Let's assume the following situation:
- an empty editable x2many list with date field (or any other
fixed width field) and optional fields
- add a record to the list, but discard it directly
- toggle an optional field
After those steps, the date field doesn't have its hardcoded,
absolute width anymore.
This rev. fixes this issue by clarifying the way the stored widths
are erased when the columns change, preventing to reach a corner
case in which we have stored widths, but we can't apply them, and
thus let the browser uniformly divide the space amongst columns.
Columns with an absolute width (e.g. '120px') must always have a
width of at least that value. When there are records in the list
the column's widths are computed by the browser according to the
content (in readonly). However, for some field types, the rendering
in edition is a bit wider (e.g. date(time) fields because of the
caret).
This rev. sets a min-width to those fields such that the rendering
is also correct in edition.
Before this rev., a grouped list view with all groups folded
behaved like a list with records w.r.t. the computation of column
widths, whereas it should behave like an empty list, as there is
no record to help the browser to compute the optimal width for each
record.
When there were records in the list (and the browser computed the
optimal column widths according to them), and the user removes
them, we want to keep the widths as they are instead of forcing
them according to the field's types.
Mainly, when adding the first record to the list, as this is when
we switch from forcing the column's widths (when there is no data),
to letting the browser optimally divide the available space.
Some other cases had to be handled, like the multi edition.
Having two attributes for this was probably overkill. We now have
a single attribute 'width' which can specify either a fixed width
(e.g. '120px') or a factor (e.g. '2.5').
On a list with no data, the width of each column is determined by
a heuristic. Before this rev., the heuristic was based on the field
type. It now takes the potential widget set in the arch into
account, and fallbacks on the field type.
This rev. refines the way we compute column's widths in editable
list views.
When there are displayed records, we let the browser compute the
width of each column (which is thus optimal with respect to the
content), and we then freeze those widths s.t. it doesn't flicker
when we switch a row in edition.
When there is no record, we keep the former heuristic based on
absolute and relative widths (depending on field types). However,
we set the same weight for all fields having a relative width (i.e.
all but boolean, date(time) and numeric), such that the remaining
space is evenly distributed between them.
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
This commit cleans up website.visitor related views by removing unnecessary create mode.
It also removes the form view on the website.visitor.page model (="Visitor Page Views") as tree view contains all
necessary information and there is no point in creating/editing them.
Task#2057933
closesodoo/odoo#35978
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Allow publishers to add a comment on frontend reviews with ratings. Purpose
is to allow to give some feedback or context on published reviews.
SPECIFICATIONS
In order to answer to a rating message (review) of a course (eLearning) or a
product (eCommerce) we add a way to the publisher to directly comment a review
inside the website rating chatter.
Any publisher can add/edit/remove comment of a rating message from the website.
The goal is not to enter into a discussion but just to give a feedback. This
comment is not sent or propagated to anyone, just displayed for information
purpose.
In portal chatter
* add 1 button below a review "Comment" (for publishers of the website only)
* only one comment possible by review/rating
* when the comment is added, display
* author name, date, comment
* 2 buttons, only visible by the website publisher: edit and delete
LINKS
Task ID : 2026911
closesodoo/odoo#35956
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Allow publishers to add a comment on frontend reviews with ratings. Purpose
is to allow to give some feedback or context on published reviews.
SPECIFICATIONS
* rename / reorder some methods according to JS guidelines;
* split portal composer and portal chatter override to better understand
module organization and ease future code additions;
LINKS
Task ID : 2026911
PURPOSE
This PR rewords the mail template "slide_template_published", makes the
member of a course follower of the course, allow members to leave courses
and prevents the templates to crash on preview
SPECIFICATIONS
When a user subscribe to a course, the user is automatically follower of
the course in order to be notified when a new content is published.
The email that the members get when a new content is published on the course
is reworded and fixed to avoid preview crash.
A new widget is implemented allowing members to unsubscribe from a course
or to leave it directly from eLearning frontend.
LINKS
Task 1985511
closesodoo/odoo#35627
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
- Before it was not possible to leave a course.
- This commit adds a modal to give the members the possibility to leave
the course and also subscribe or unsubscribe to get notified or not.
+ Display a warning message when leaving if field enroll value is "payment".
task-1985511
This commit improves the email that the members get when a new content
is published on the course and prevents the template to crash on preview.
task-1985511
when a user subscribe to a course, the user is now automatically
follower of the course in order to be notified when a new content
is published
task-1985511
When we open a table, the option verify sync is called, and doesn't
always work because of a race condition when we chack the status of
connecting, and the icon that has already changed.
As it doesn't really check anything because we check in python that the
orders are synchronised, we removed it.
closesodoo/odoo#35949
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
In the tour of pos restaurant, we are closing the pos that will redirect
to /web, and we won't wait this redirection. That will lead to a
remaining request taking too much time.
Since the refactoring, SMS is no longer in auto install. This is a shame
because we want to put forward the SMS features. In any case, the user can
always disable SMS from the General Settings if it is too invasive.
FP / AJU request.
Task 2057705
closesodoo/odoo#35946
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
To correctly choose in which account a line should be posted,
we have to know if the partner is a customer or a supplier.
Specification
=============
Keep track of the number of account moves "in" and "out"
a partner has. These counts should be based on the posted
account moves. A customer that has been created from the
'Customer' menuitem will have a rank=1. When a customer
invoice will be created for him, the generated account moves
will be taken into account to compute its rank. The most
invoices we have for a partner, the higher his rank is.
Note: To avoid any concurrent update failures on the partner,
if one transaction has already locked a partner row, the count
update will be skipped that time.
This means the values may be approximative in the database!
The exact values will eventually be correctly computed at
the next successfull try.
Known limitation of this approach: The computation ignores
the set of currently selected companies. Actually, storing
context dependent values in the database is a bad practice,
and is avoided in that case by taking all the companies into
account.
Use the stored fields `customer_rank` and `supplier_rank`
to order partners when searching by name. This allows to show
best customers or best suppliers on top.
To choose if best customer or supplier are shown on top,
the context key `res_partner_search_mode` is used.
The context key can take two values: 'customer' or 'supplier'.
This decision partially reverts/revamps 8766f38 to only use
account moves instead of PO and SO
On actions showing partners, set a default filters to menus to
only display customers (customer_rank > 0) if the string is
"Customers", and only suppliers if the string is "Vendors" or
"Suppliers".
TaskID: 2049131
closesodoo/odoo#35942
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
When you are creating an invoice from the POS, the report route is
called to download the invoice, since changes made in rev: 118190f3b3
The values for ids where empty, so we give them now the correct id list.
closesodoo/odoo#35926
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Shreya Modi