Set up the following kanban columns:
| Col 1 | Col 2 | Col 3 | Col 4 | Col 5 | Col 6 | F |
| | | | | | Card | |
<------- Screen width ---------->
Col x are unfolded columns.
F is a folded colum.
Moving the Card from Col 6 to F is impossible: the card won't go 'out of
the screen' on the right, which prevents its center to reach F.
Commit 5ba6d93810 deactivates the drag & drop on read-only fields.
In order to restrict the kanban cards displacements, the `containment`
attribute is used to either restrict the displacement:
- in `o_kanban_view` if draggable
- in the parent if not (to allow the resequence)
The class `o_kanban_view` is too restrictive: when movind the card to
the folded column F, the card must go out of `o_kanban_view`.
opw-803929
on account.payment, when changing the payment type to Internal Transfer,
the result of the onchange was erroneous as inbound and outbound methods
lack relevance in that case
After this commit, We choose to display all bank and cash journals in this case
OPW 804214
- Main currency: USD
- Create a PO in EUR
- Create an invoice from the PO
- The invoice is in USD and the exchange rate is applied
- Change the currency to EUR
The conversion is not applied anymore.
The original issue was that changing the date would overwrite any amount
modified in the invoice. Actually, the dependency on the date is not
really necessary. Indeed, this is supposed to help enconding invoices,
but it is likely that:
- If the PO is issued in a currency A, the bill received is in currency
A.
=> no conversion necessary (solved from 11.1).
- If the PO is issued in a currency A and the bill received is in
currency B, the exchange rate used by the vendor is different from
ours.
=> manual corrections are necessary
Therefore, we remove the dependency on the date for the amount
recomputation. However, we still use it in the onchange. This way:
- the amount estimated should be close to the amount requested
- we avoid unexpected recomputation of amounts
Introduced with d8112b0238.
opw-805926
$('web_editor.base').ready() returns a deferred that:
- wait at least for $(document).ready()
- wait at least for require('web.ajax').loadXML()
- at most once starts translations configuration
But there is an issue since there is unexpectedly no reference to the
translations, whilst it should have also been ready when ready was
resolved.
This commit keep the reference so translations can be used after
$('web_editor.base').ready() is resolved as it was before 7dfdfa0103.
note: in 11.0 it should be solved with 29729769 (so fix is for [10,11[)
opw-804148
closes#22522
Sometimes the formatting buttons had no effect or formatted more than
they should (like a whole column when triple clicking on a paragraph
only). This was because of the `listBetween` function implementation.
This is supposed to return all the nodes between one element and another
one... but the logic is wrong without saying from which *point* to start
and which *point* to end. For example, when asking the list between an
element and its parent, the result is very wrong as there is no way to
go from the beginning of an element to the beginning of its parent using
the `walkPoint` function as the `listBetween` function is doing.
Ideally, the function should be entirely fixed but this can be tricky.
For now, the function is just extended to allow to specify points
instead of nodes, and those are used by the `formatBlock` function to
solve the current problem.
If some orders have no taxes (e.g. manual reimbursement with a negative amount)
the sum of taxes lines gave a different result than the total amount sold.
e.g.:
order 1: price 10€, including 2€ for taxes
order 2: price -5€, no taxes
report:
taxes:
20%, 2€ taxes, 8€ base amount
total sold:
5€
2+8 != 5
Also change line.price_subtotal as it was computed twice if there was two taxes
on a line (although it will probably never happen in the pos)
opw-805415
... hopefully.
This *must* be forward-ported.
Depending on the browser, the triple-click behavior is different. This
is especially problematic on Chrome, where blank characters at the start
of the neighbor of the clicked element are selected.
A weak attempt to solve that was made by commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b85bd358234684974f9af63bc5f28cfabb527767
This commit hopes to solve all the issues once and for all by fully
reimplementing the triple-click for all browsers. The concept is simple:
when a triple-click occurs, select the whole *inner* content of the
deepest DOM *element* that was clicked.
For some unknown reasons, the editor sometimes crashes when dropping a
snippet. As a temporary fix, the non-critical line that causes the
problem is try/catch protected by this commit.
In the case where:
create an invoice with payment terms that contains at least 2 term lines
Validate
create a refund by clicking cancel and reconcile
Before this commit, the refund move lines were wrongly created and reconciled with the invoice's move lines
After this commit, since payment terms are irrelevant on refunds, we set it to false and the problem doesn't raise
OPW 804752
The case: create an invoice of 2000 euros. Payment terms have been configured as:
1) fixed amount 150, 0 days after invoice date.
2) fixed amount 200, 10 days after invoice date.
3) fixed amount 200, 20 days after invoice date.
4) balance, 30 days after invoice date
Before this commit, when issuing a payment of 150 at day 0, that payment got reconciled with the balance line.
After this commit, the payment is reconciled with the right payment term line
OPW 805006
Take as example:
having demo user as expense manager
create with demo user an expense sheet for the employee linked to admin
on save, there was an access rights error for the write on mail_followers
After this commit, there isn't the error anymore,
since the computation of the field related is done with sudo
OPW 804740
On the payment confirmation page, when the payment is still pending.
Before this commit:
the user friendly message disappeared and a warning icon took its place
After this commit, the warning icon is prepended to the message.
OPW 787799
Step to reproduce:
- Go to 'Blog' > 'Blog Posts' in the 'Website Admin' module
- Select several blog.post on the list view
- Click on 'Archive' in the 'Action' dropdown
This will throw a server error since write() is overriden for blog.post and
do an ensure_one()
This commit closes#22208
- Set the OS to a GMT- timezone (e.g. 'America/Los Angeles')
- Set the format of the date to '%d/%m/%Y'
- Go to 'Account > Adviser > Journal Entries'
- Type '02-01-2018'
The suggested date is 31/01/2018.
Setting the moment object as UTC will lead to a conversion of the date
to the OS timezone when calling `toDate`, e.g.:
Mon Jan 31 2018 16:00:00 GMT-0800 (PST)
UTC should only be used in case of datetime, not date.
opw-803466
In any piece of code, execute the following:
```
self.env['account.config.settings'].create({})
```
It overwrites the values of `fiscalyear_last_day` and
`fiscalyear_last_month` to 31 and 12.
Setting a default value on a related field will automatically write
these values on the related.
opw-805205
In the case where:
1- Do an order on the pos selling a product A (amount = 10)
2- Do another order returning a certain quantity of A (with a quantity < 0)
3- Do a third order selling something else (amount = 5)
Before this commit, the account move lines of the payment move and of the sale move of operation 2 weren't reconciled
This was because the credit to the receivable account of the return was reconciled with the debit of the first operation,
leaving the debit of the payment of the return alone
(i. e. the lines number 1 & 3 & 5 were reconciled together, instead of 1 & 2 & 5, and 3 & 4)
We end up in a situation like this (at validation time)
RECEIVABLE
D | C || OPERATION | Line Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 | || (1 & 3-Engaging Sale) | 1
| 10 || (1-Payment) | 2
| 10 || (2-Engaging Return) | 3
10 | || (2-Payment Return) | 4
| 5 || (3-Payment) | 5
After this commit, we reconcile the returns for each order before reconciling other transaction chains
The fix is limited in its scope as the automatic reconciliation for the pos transaction is fairly recent
and a "nice to have"
OPW 787298
A few fields present in the "Private Info" tab of the Employee form did
not have the corresponding `groups` attribute.
This could cause access rights problems.
Nicolas Martinelli