Hr_expense add several people as follower of expense reports to ensure
various responsibles are notified. However depending on configuration
same partner could be added several times in an ORM command. This makes
the unicity of partner_id for a given document crash.
This issue has been introduced at ab8f5ec95d when working on task ID 30933.
Set up a delivery method that has a country set on it, but no states
(e.g. USA)
When the client is required to fill his address info in and when he chooses USA as the country
Before this commit:
The selection field where the states are selectable is not displayed.
After this commit:
All the states of the country are selectable
The usability choice is to say that if states are not specified on the delivery method
that means all states are supported
OPW 1818591
The python/xml try to create a default value for
property_stock_account_input_categ_id for all categories, but the yaml
only try for the All category and in 11.0 this is not propagated to
child categories.
This commit make the yaml coherent with account.chart.template
generate_properties and
stock_account.property_stock_account_input_categ_id XML record.
note: second part of 1bf25fc01
property_stock_account_input_categ_id,
property_stock_account_output_categ_id,
property_stock_valuation_account_id ir.property default values on
product.category could be duplicated eg. if l10n_generic_coa was
installed before stock_account.
This did not happen in enterprise but happened in enterprise breaking
the test added in odoo/odoo@6bcf9ac2e.
- Define 2 companies A and B. Delivery methods are linked to products in
company A
- Deactivate 'Share product to all companies'
- Create a user B in Company B only
- As user B, create a SO and open the drop-down list for delivery
methods
An access error is raised.
Delivery methods should follow the same record rules than the products
they are linked to.
opw-1815490
Issue:
An additional information page is part of our shop process to allow
additional information to be submitted. If this form is left blank,
then selecting the next button allows the process to continue.
However, if data is added to the form the form freezes and the process
will not continue when 'next' is selected.
Why:
Public user can not read the field 'model' of 'ir.model' (to save the
attachments)
opw-1818592
This rev. fixes two issues with the loading (e.g. after an F5) of
form views in mobile.
First, the form view being not a mobile-friendly view, it opened
the kanban view instead (if there were one defined in the action),
whether it should have kept the form view as they don't diplay the
same things (one is multiRecord, the other isn't).
Second, after fixing the first issue, the main (multiRecord) view
which was lazyloaded when loading a form view wasn't
mobile-friendly so if the user clicked on the breadcrumbs to go
back, he landed on a list view (if the list view was the first view
of the action), whether he should be on a kanban view, which is
mobile-friendly.
This is a manual forwardport of rev. b466b3bc60.
Consider the following scenario: open in edit mode a form view
containing a many2many field displayed with widget many2many_tags,
on the many2many field dropdown, click on 'Search More' (it opens
a dialog), and in the dialog, try to save the current search in
the searchview's favorite menu.
Before this rev., it crashed because it tried to retrieve the
action's context (to add to the saved filter), whereas there is no
action in this case.
Actually, the action's context should never been used in this case.
What must be used is the controller's context (this mainly makes
sense for Pivot and Graph views).
Fixes#23293
This is a manual forwardport of rev. b466b3bc.
Consider the following scenario: open in edit mode a form view
containing a many2many field displayed with widget many2many_tags,
on the many2many field dropdown, click on 'Search More' (it opens
a dialog), and in the dialog, try to save the current search in
the searchview's favorite menu.
Before this rev., it tried to retrieve the context of the active
controller in the closest instance of a ViewManager-like widget
in the SearchView's ancestors.
First, it is wrong as in the given scenario, the requested context
is actually the one of the list controller in the dialog, not the
one of the form controller in the background.
Second, it produces a crash in Studio, when trying to save filters
in the dialog opened by clicking on 'Search More' on the groups
many2many field in the sidebar.
This part of the code can't be tested in this version, but tests
will be added in master.
Fixes#23293
Consider the following scenario: open in edit mode a form view
containing a many2many field displayed with widget many2many_tags,
on the many2many field dropdown, click on 'Search More' (it opens
a dialog), and in the dialog, try to save the current search in
the searchview's favorite menu.
Before this rev., it tried to retrieve the context of the active
view in the closest instance of a ViewManager-like widget in the
SearchView's ancestors.
First, it is wrong as in the given scenario, the requested context
is actually the one of the list controller in the dialog, not the
one of the form controller in the background.
Second, it produces a crash in Studio, when trying to save filters
in the dialog opened by clicking on 'Search More' on the groups
many2many field in the sidebar.
This part of the code can't be tested in this version, but tests
will be added in master.
Fixes#23293
Have your OS be in Vancouver with time = 15:59:00
We are on day X
Have a next activity on a lead, scheduled for today
At 15:59:00 the next activity is not overdue
Before this commit:
Past 16:00:00 the next activity becomes overdue
This is because 16:00:00 is 00:00:00 in UTC (+8 hours)
And the next activity is scheduled for day X
But in UTC, we just passed at day X+1
Hence, the next activity being overdue
After this commit:
The next activity is not overdue, since we are actually on day X
OPW 1815323
In 3807e718 demo data were changed which affected the
bank_statement_reconciliation test which didn't expect a BILL/*/0002
line to be used instead of INV/*/0002 line.
The previous commit forbids to change the currency of a company having accounting entries, but there are some created by demo data and some tests were trying to set a different currency (to set up a fix environment). So in order to allow that in tests, we do it via a SQL query directly
Following the previous fixes in stock where we had to handle non-valued
move lines inside a valued move, the valuation of the dropshipping was
bypassed because a dropshipping move is not an in move, nor an out move.
We now value the dropshipping move always positively. We adapt the
sale_stock code that generate the anglo saxon entry to use the abs value
of the move, not -1 * value. It was done this way because all out moves
are negative.
We add 8 tests to test all the valuation cases: continental or anglo
saxon, ordered or delivered, fifo or standard.
opw-1817363
fixes#23214
Use case to reproduce:
- Create a sale order with a stockable product.
- Confirm the sale order.
- Validate the pick.
- Validate the pack.
- Cancel the OUT.
- Run the stock scheduler.
-> Picking are created from pick and ship.
The scheduler should not try to create missing pickings
for broken move's chain. Since v11, it's not possible to create
a partial mto chain that means if a chain is broken it's due to
a manual action from a user and thus we won't automatically
repair what he cancelled on purpose. That's why we won't create
a new move out in this case.
It also don't make sense to recreate a new mto chain from a
cancelled picking. Thus we had a condition in domain in order to
only take moves that make sense.
Based on preliminary work from Florent de Labarre <florent.mirieu@gmail.com>
Closes#23441#23458
OPW-1820226
This patch prevents bugs fixed at 5d463d2 to block the database.
It was preventing the autovacuum to properly clean old records.
Failing to unlink (may have various different reasons) should not block the
autovacuum to try on other models
Closes#23455
This reverts commit 7642754122.
The reason is that we finally decided to implement that in another way and we want to avoid people start using this feature as it would be replaced in next saas. Yes, I know, that sucks.
New task ID: 1823153
When creating a record in a form view of model A, and adding a line
in an inside tree view of model B(with a One2Many from A to B), it was impossible
to delete a wrong line even if the record has not been saved because the user had no
right to delete a record on model B.
opw:1819099
[IMP] purchase_requisition : add analytic_tag_ids field in purchase requistion
[IMP] sale: set analytic tags on invoice based on the analytic tags defined on SO
[IMP] account_analytic_default: add default analytic tags to invoice lines created from SO for down payment
(#23110)
Since we are able to lazy load Qweb templates, there was
an issue to generate Awesome Timesheet iOS native app with
Cordova properly. It seems that under Cordova, iOS always
returns 0 for the status on a xml http request object.
The problem is that native applications are requesting
a local file from something that isn't a webserver.
The local file is delivered with no http headers that means no
"200 OK" header and no "404 Not Found" errors.
In this case, the request is still be completing as intended even
if the status code used by browsers is 0.
For more info, see:
https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Web/API/XMLHttpRequesthttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331610
The default function commputing the journal_id on invoices uses the context to get the type of the invoice and choose the journal. In regular cases, it works fine, but not with demo data. Hence, we need to explicitly set the journal on them.
In mobile, we want a special 'Today' button to be displayed on the
bottom right corner of the control panel. Rev. ebe58d92 enforces
this by defining less layout rules on the control panel. However,
those rules apply globally, for all control panels, not only in
Calendar views. So it produces undesired behaviors in other views.
This rev. removes the undesired less rules, and instead appends
the 'Today' button in the pager area, which is in the bottom right
corner.
There is several issue happening when changing quantity:
1) if website_sale_stock is installed, the displayed price is not
updated when changing quantities.
2) if the "Add to Cart" price is not updated, it erroneously displays
the price multiplied by the quantity.
3) when prices are updated, it only update attribute_value_ids.
4) when variant are displayed as list view, visually the last list item
is selected instead of the first, also changing quantity doesn't
update price as it should be given pricelist.
The first issue is caused by invalid JSON in data-attribute_value_ids
attribute. The code modify the `.data('attribute_value_ids')` thinking
it will be permanent. But if the value was invalid JSON we always parse
it on the fly inside a temporary object so the object is never changed.
The second issue is because originally, the "data-attribute_value_ids"
inside "Add to Cart" was set wrongly (when rendering the view) because
get_attribute_value_ids got the website_price multiplied by quantity.
The third issue was even with website_sale_stock is not installed
`.data('attribute_value_ids')` was only updated for one of the possible
multiple ones in the page.
With this change, we had json.dumps to ensure data-attribute_value_ids
is good JSON, and we correct errors so it is fixed for instance only
updating sources without updating website_sale and website_sale_options
modules.
note: when views are updated, this also solves a bigger issue when
python2 is used (because attribute_value_ids contained u'text' strings.
master equivalent of #23392 without js crutches for xml not updated
opw-1816479
closes#23467
There is several issue happening when changing quantity:
1) if website_sale_stock is installed, the displayed price is not
updated when changing quantities.
2) if the "Add to Cart" price is not updated, it erroneously displays
the price multiplied by the quantity.
3) when prices are updated, it only update attribute_value_ids.
4) when variant are displayed as list view, visually the last list item
is selected instead of the first, also changing quantity doesn't
update price as it should be given pricelist.
The first issue is caused by invalid JSON in data-attribute_value_ids
attribute. The code modify the `.data('attribute_value_ids')` thinking
it will be permanent. But if the value was invalid JSON we always parse
it on the fly inside a temporary object so the object is never changed.
The second issue is because originally, the "data-attribute_value_ids"
inside "Add to Cart" was set wrongly (when rendering the view) because
get_attribute_value_ids got the website_price multiplied by quantity.
The third issue was even with website_sale_stock is not installed
`.data('attribute_value_ids')` was only updated for one of the possible
multiple ones in the page.
With this change, we had json.dumps to ensure data-attribute_value_ids
is good JSON, and we correct errors so it is fixed for instance only
updating sources without updating website_sale and website_sale_options
modules.
note: when views are updated, this also solves a bigger issue when
python2 is used (because attribute_value_ids contained u'text' strings.
another version will be merged in master with #23467
opw-1816479
closes#23392
If the user tried to generate a report with more than 256 columns,
he would get a traceback instead of an error message.
Furthermore, if only one measure was selected, then the check was not done
and the user would also get a traceback.
opw-1816931
The default function commputing the journal_id on invoices uses the context to get the type of the invoice and choose the journal. In regular cases, it works fine, but not with demo data. Hence, we need to explicitly set the journal on them.
Nicolas Martinelli