[FIX] stock: scheduler run cancel MTO picking

Use case to reproduce:
- Create a sale order with a stockable product.
- Confirm the sale order.
- Validate the pick.
- Validate the pack.
- Cancel the OUT.
- Run the stock scheduler.
-> Picking are created from pick and ship.

The scheduler should not try to create missing pickings
for broken move's chain. Since v11, it's not possible to create
a partial mto chain that means if a chain is broken it's due to
a manual action from a user and thus we won't automatically
repair what he cancelled on purpose. That's why we won't create
a new move out in this case.

It also don't make sense to recreate a new mto chain from a
cancelled picking. Thus we had a condition in domain in order to
only take moves that make sense.

Based on preliminary work from Florent de Labarre <florent.mirieu@gmail.com>

Closes #23441 #23458
OPW-1820226

addons/stock/models/procurement.py

@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ class ProcurementGroup(models.Model):
 
     @api.model
     def _get_exceptions_domain(self):
-        return [('procure_method', '=', 'make_to_order'), ('move_orig_ids', '=', False)]
+        return [('procure_method', '=', 'make_to_order'), ('move_orig_ids', '=', False), ('state', 'not in', ('cancel', 'done', 'draft'))]
 
     @api.model
     def _run_scheduler_tasks(self, use_new_cursor=False, company_id=False):

addons/stock/tests/test_move2.py

@@ -185,6 +185,51 @@ class TestPickShip(TestStockCommon):
         # the client picking should not be assigned anymore, as we returned partially what we took
         self.assertEqual(picking_client.state, 'confirmed')
 
+    def test_mto_resupply_cancel_ship(self):
+        """ This test simulates a pick pack ship with a resupply route
+        set. Pick and pack are validated, ship is cancelled. This test
+        ensure that new picking are not created from the cancelled
+        ship after the scheduler task. The supply route is only set in
+        order to make the scheduler run without mistakes (no next
+        activity).
+        """
+        picking_pick, picking_pack, picking_ship = self.create_pick_pack_ship()
+        stock_location = self.env['stock.location'].browse(self.stock_location)
+        warehouse_1 = self.env['stock.warehouse'].search([('company_id', '=', self.env.user.id)], limit=1)
+        warehouse_1.write({'delivery_steps': 'pick_pack_ship'})
+        warehouse_2 = self.env['stock.warehouse'].create({
+            'name': 'Small Warehouse',
+            'code': 'SWH'
+        })
+        warehouse_1.write({
+            'default_resupply_wh_id': warehouse_2.id,
+            'resupply_wh_ids': [(6, 0, [warehouse_2.id])]
+        })
+        resupply_route = self.env['stock.location.route'].search([('supplier_wh_id', '=', warehouse_2.id), ('supplied_wh_id', '=', warehouse_1.id)])
+        self.assertTrue(resupply_route)
+        self.productA.write({'route_ids': [(4, resupply_route.id), (4, self.env.ref('stock.route_warehouse0_mto').id)]})
+
+        self.env['stock.quant']._update_available_quantity(self.productA, stock_location, 10.0)
+
+        picking_pick.action_assign()
+        picking_pick.move_lines[0].move_line_ids[0].qty_done = 10.0
+        picking_pick.action_done()
+
+        picking_pack.action_assign()
+        picking_pack.move_lines[0].move_line_ids[0].qty_done = 10.0
+        picking_pack.action_done()
+
+        picking_ship.action_cancel()
+        picking_ship.move_lines.write({'procure_method': 'make_to_order'})
+
+        self.env['procurement.group'].run_scheduler()
+        next_activity = self.env['mail.activity'].search([('res_model', '=', 'product.template'), ('res_id', '=', self.productA.product_tmpl_id.id)])
+        self.assertEqual(picking_ship.state, 'cancel')
+        self.assertFalse(next_activity, 'If a next activity has been created if means that scheduler failed\
+        and the end of this test do not have sense.')
+        self.assertEqual(len(picking_ship.move_lines.mapped('move_orig_ids')), 0,
+        'Scheduler should not create picking pack and pick since ship has been manually cancelled.')
+
     def test_no_backorder_1(self):
         """ Check the behavior of doing less than asked in the picking pick and chosing not to
         create a backorder. In this behavior, the second picking should obviously only be able to