This problem appears when the module l10n_be_hr_payroll_fleet is installed with the
dynamic report for employees (enterprise module hr_contract_reports).
This module inherits from hr.contract and will create and modify some fields.
By modifying contract's table, PostgreSQL will drop the view from
hr_contract_employee_report. At the end of the installation, PostgreSQL will
check if tables exist, it isn't the case for the view from
hr_contract_employee_report, so it will recreate it.
It's the normal behavior.
But when a table is missing, a warning is logged and create problem with
Runbot. For this reason, it's better to log an Info and not a Warning message.
Validated with @rco
Before this commit, the field assignment would cache the value it received, even
if that value was altered during `write`. This can happen if `write` is
overridden (for example to resize images), or it could also happen if a database
procedure is altering the value.
To fix this issue, we do not cache the value that was assigned. This implies
that additional queries may be necessary to retrieve the value, but those were
already necessary most of the time, so it does not have a significant impact on
performances.
From an onchange, at this point, (4) doesn't mean "no change" it means
"reset to database values". Through the interplay of client and server
reverse-engineering one another at this point the client (is supposed
to) assume the o2m results are "complete" and a diff from the
current *in-database* values rather than the in-client (sent to the
server) ones.
So a (1) should completely replace all existing values, and a (4)
should just remove all of them (but keep the record linked).
closesodoo/odoo#32617
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
For existing installations, creating indices might not always be
possible, e.g. if you have a Text/Char field that has an index=True
set on it in a field override and pre-existing rows longer than
the pg supported size , the index creation will fail.
Instead of failing miserably during the schema modification, simply
log the problem instead and keep going.
closesodoo/odoo#32442
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Purpose of this task is,
Before this task, the customer was able to click on on the email of a contact from the res.partner view.
But, he wasn't able to click on this same email when the modal of a contact was open.
For the phone it's the opposite. You can't click on the phone from the res.partner view but well from the contact's modal.
So, I made both the fields clickable in both (res.partner view and contact's modal)
Task ID: 1965730
Closes: #32586
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
reuse current_thread result
No needed to call threading.current_thread() on evry arg setting
closesodoo/odoo#32000
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
When making a manual payment with account_sepa we want to allow people to add a bank account as it might display the European QR code for banking app, but this should stay optional.
So we made sure that the conditions making the field visible and required weren't the same.
part of task #1918423closesodoo/odoo#32198
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
simplification of payments objects and refactoring of the code
* registering payment(s) from the list of invoice now generate a single payment per invoice selected
* no more abstract object for payments/payment wizard as the logic is now really simple:
- group_invoices option is now removed and we never try to group payments based on the currency/customer of whatsoever (see above),
- the payment amount is the full residual amount of invoice and users cannot change it anymore
* partner_bank_account_id not required as soon as visible (depends on the payment method)
* refactoring to name tags and allow easier inheritance via xpath
part of task #1918423
Technically it does 3 different things:
* switch from 1 level of o2m to 2 levels of o2m when recursing
* handles `parent.<xxx>` readonly modifiers on o2m subfields
* handles `id` readonly modifiers on o2m subfields (already worked in the
normal case but not for o2m records from default_get)
The last two especially are temporary quickfixes, that will need proper fixes.
closesodoo/odoo#32428
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
Checking access rules only makes sence if we have some records,
_filter_access_rules will always return a subset or current
recordset, and a subset or a empty recordset is an empty recordset.
closesodoo/odoo#32313
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Should correctly handle / fallback to regular code when processing
non-stored partners.
Perf difference according to cprofile on my machine:
original python:
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
1 0.134 0.134 205.380 205.380 res_partner.py:277(_compute_commercial_partner)
SQLized
1 0.118 0.118 67.239 67.239 res_partner.py:280(_compute_commercial_partner)
most of the time leftover seems to be in modified_draft
With profiling enabled, importing 10k partners, with all of them
having the same parent (though not with all of them having the same
is_company setting) lowers sync / post-process time from ~550s to
~330s.
Put it in an override to _load_records_create so it's only active for
imports (which is the original report & test case), use a context key
to avoid going the post-processing work in create.
- Set your fiscal year end date to 28th February
- Run the P&L a year before a leap year, e.g. anytime between March 1st
and December 31st 2019.
- Select 'Last Financial Year'
The dates are set from 2019-03-01 to 2019-02-28.
There are actually 2 bugs. The one solved here is the following
inconsistency:
```
current_date = type(date)(2019, 4, 3)
date_utils.get_fiscal_year(current_date, day=28, month=2)
'date_from': datetime.date(2019, 3, 1), 'date_to': datetime.date(2020, 2, 28)
current_date = type(date)(2020, 2, 28)
date_utils.get_fiscal_year(current_date, day=28, month=2)
{'date_from': datetime.date(2019, 3, 1), 'date_to': datetime.date(2020, 2, 29)}
```
Both should return `'date_to': datetime.date(2020, 2, 29)`. This implies
that the period is recognized as `custom`, which is affected by the bug
solved in PR https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/4006
opw-1949628
closesodoo/odoo#32366
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
The SSF would correctly filter out readonly fields when saving a
toplevel form, however it could not remove readonly values when saving
o2m pseudo-records to the parent form (as these would be expected to
remain available for reading upon the next edition and whatnot), so
these values would get sent in 0/1 commands.
Filter out these fields during the parent / toplevel save call.
Complexity notes:
* evaluating readonly modifiers requires the entire record, so
unchanged fields still have to be written back to the parent form
and be filtered out when *it* is set up for save, an alternative
would be to store the `changed` and `readonly` flags alongside the
record dict, and have the post-process only override the
pre-computed readonly flag using force_save
* had to fix a test to match the new behaviour, the post-edition
states turns out to be in line with the client's behaviour (or how
it looks anyway)
Fixes#32019
The extra setup probably affects any o2m whose edition view itself
contains an o2m, but most likely to blow up entirely on models with
some sort of tree structure (parent/child relationship): the SSF
eagerly loads and setups the o2m's view, and the o2m's o2m's, ... ad
infinitam.
A better / cleaner fix would be to set up the subview on-demand (and
possibly cache it), but the rest of the o2m stuff is unlikely to work
correctly recursively so just don't recurse the o2m view setup at all
for now.
fixes#31458
`res.partner.bank` is ordered by sequence, but:
- there is no default value
- there is no widget handle to set it
Therefore, methods such as `_get_partner_bank_id` might retrieve an
unexpected value.
To avoid this:
- we fallback to sort by ID
- we add a default value
- we add the widget handle
opw-1948964
closesodoo/odoo#32300
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
PRs #28645 and #31494 were not applied to 12.0, but there's no reason
not to, they should only fix things (make behaviours more in-line with
the regular client), and since o2m is an area where more fixes are
needed and it would be nice to have them in 12.0...
This rev. changes the layout of *editable* list views to a fixed
layout. This means that we are now responsible of the width of
each column. To do that, we associate with each field type a
factor, and the higher the factor is, the larger the column will
be (w.r.t. the others). This default value can be overriden in the
arch.
The fixed layout allows to remove the absolute positionning of
widgets inside editable lists (done in the next commit).
Part of task 1915702
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
jbm-odoo