When a max weight is set on a packaging type is set, you get a warning
when you put in pack some content that weighs bigger than the max weight
of the packaging type
Several addons inherit from message_post method. Instead of redefining
the long list of parameters let us just use kwargs and propagate them to
the super call. Only really used parameters are set as explicit.
Purpose is to lessen issues when changing some parameters default value
or when having some API change.
Added Unique Entity Number (UEN) to company and partner to use them in the IRAS Audit File (l10n_sg_reports)
Changed vat_label on Singapore
Added new taxes (2019)
Fixed the Chart of Account (account codes and types)
Added 'Permit Number' and 'Permit Number Date' on invoices
Currently even module logs a message in all employee channel with a
message telling the module has been installed. It is not interesting
as it gives no real information and is not interesting for users that
do not use event module and/or do not have access to it.
Let us remove that data.
When reinitializing modules it is impossible to create partners if
sale is installed because sale_warn field has a required column
but no default value if the module does not depend from sale. Use
case is trying to run test_mail tests with sale installed.
As this field is not business critical it is now not required. As there
is a default value behavior should not change for users.
See also dd47abdcc3 and 06a02ae4c2.
Indeed message_post uses only keywords arguments. Let us therefore use
them when calling the method. It will lessen number of issues if someday
the argument order and/or the API of message_post changes.
It probably comes from old medium-like-stuff comment management that has
been removed since. Discussion on blog posts is now a simple chatter
and does not require all those controllers.
This will avoid unique constrain to be raised in the scenario of a record having
multiple ir.model.data entries to the same record.
This can be reproduced in standard with the following scenario
1. The product.template product_product_4_product_template has multiple variants
product_product_4
product_product_4b
product_product_4c
...
2. At the creation of the records, ir.model.data are automatically created
product_product_4_product_template
product_product_4b_product_template
product_product_4c_product_template
...
While this could/should be fixed too. Having several ir.model.data to the
same record is not forbidden and could be reproduced in different ways.
3. Export the translations
#. module: product
#: model:product.product,description_sale:product.product_product_4
#: model:product.product,description_sale:product.product_product_4b
#: model:product.product,description_sale:product.product_product_4c
#: model:product.template,description_sale:product.product_product_4_product_template
#: model:product.template,description_sale:product.product_product_4b_product_template
#: model:product.template,description_sale:product.product_product_4c_product_template
msgid ""
...
As the field description_sale is present on both model and is translatable
4. Load a .po file with these translations
The 3 product.template entries points to the same record, making the unique
constrain raise an error
This error can also be reproduced with the project_time_mode_id_duplicate_xmlid
field creating two xmlid for the same ir.model.fields
Closes#21472
Allow to alter the behavior by introducing preparation methods that can be overwritten.
Partial merge of PR #16093, from an original idea and commit of David Arnold (XOE Solutions)
In many2many lists, the remove record from the widget is a trash bin.
It is confusing, as people feel they are deleting it when they are
only unlinking it.
So in many2many, we propose to change the trash icon by a 'X'.
This icon appears in many2many relations and in many2many widgets:
even though hr.expense.sheet defines the expense lines as a one2many,
it uses a many2many widget, so we use a 'X' instead of the trash bin.
To avoid ambiguity, we decided to rename 'delete' to 'remove'.
The new settings model loads by default all settings. In the case of
non-admin user having the 'Settings' access rights this can lead to
access errors.
This commit deals with the multi-company issues on a standard
installation. If the admin is in Company A and the other user in Company
B, accessing the settings is pretty much impossible because of records
rules.
This fixes the master or demo data to avoid setting a company by
default. Note that it only fixes a standard installation: if the
settings are later customized, there is no guarantee that it will still
work.
Problematic fields:
`auth_signup_template_user_id`
`crm_default_team_id`
`leave_timesheet_task_id`
opw-801210
Previous to this commit, if a user hadn't properly set up his
Authorize.net credentials, when getting a response from Authorize.net's
servers, we would expect some attributes to be in the response's body,
but this is not the case if the credentials are wrong, thus we would
have an unexpected error like "NoneType object has no attribute text"
which is only a sympton of the real error (bad credentials and no
error-checking).
This is fixed by checking if the response body contains an error
message, if it is the case we raise an UserError with the error code and
the error message (which is only shown if debug mode is activated).
OPW 788261
[FIX] web: Fix column_invisible issue
This commit fixes an issue with the column_invisible attribute.
When we choose product variant for BOM for any particular product,
at that time from the BOM Lines column "Apply on Variants" is hidden,
but when we unset product variant from BOM Form,
at that time the column 'Variants" set to visible. but in this case, it is set to hidden always.
PR 21693, OPW 779555
[FIX] web: Fix column_invisible issue
This commit fixes an issue with the column_invisible attribute.
When we choose product variant for BOM for any particular product,
at that time from the BOM Lines column "Apply on Variants" is hidden,
but when we unset product variant from BOM Form,
at that time the column 'Variants" set to visible. but in this case, it is set to hidden always.
PR 21693, OPW 779555
When
- a user A had set 'notifications handled by Odoo'
- a user B sent a @userA message
Before this commit, the user wasn't notified in the inbox needaction
After this commit, he is
OPW 801315
When confirming a quotation for an MTO product, the state of the
delivery order goes from draft to waiting another operation to waiting
while it should stays in waiting another operation.
If procurement_jit is enabled, confirming a sale order line will
unreserve and rereserve the pickings associated (see
`action_launch_procurement_rule` override). Unreserving a picking will
always set its state to "confirmed", which is wrong if it should be in
"waiting another operation". Not writing on state (which is a computed
field) and let the depends call _compute_state fixes the issue.
The unreserve/rereserve thing is probably useless and is a remain of the
previous stock implementation where it was not possible to complete the
reservation of a move without wiping all its current reservation.
Another commit will improve this part of the code.
opw-801588
Pierre Masereel