Some Belgian banks (e.g. CPH) seem to generate CODA
import files that do not comply with the CODA 2.3
(or 2.4 or 2.5) spec, specificially in the header
we use to detect CODA files.
opportunities button tip. Using directly the first child
is risky because modules can add statbutton before the
opportunities button (published for example). Using a
class seems a safer way to select the target.
The displayed date was incorrect: instead of the day number in the month (1st-31th), we displayed the day order in the week (0th-6th).
Yeah, this one was a tricky one...
`product_qty` field is not recomputed at record creation.
Force field recomputation at any change
Removing the trigger on `product.product` should not be a problem as
product uom can't be changed once there are move lines.
opw:629650
If a campaign was done to a list of Applicant, marketing team had an error loading the kanban view.
Because to display the number of recipents, a search is done with a domain on hr.applicant.
Model that except Human Resources / Officier, nobody can read.
This will allow to speed up our migration platform: as funzip can pipe
the output of the first file of the archive, even if the file is not
fully unzipped yet. This is useful to plays with dump.sql without waiting
for the full archive decompression.
When a `noupdate` record is processed during an update,
the update_dummy method marks the record as "seen" so
it won't be deleted at the garbage collection step,
and seen as an obsolete external ID.
This needs to be done also for the parent records via
_inherits, because they have also received an implicit
external ID at creation, and must not be garbage
collected, even if their `noupdate` flag (db side)
is not set because the flag was added later.
This rare problem could be reproduced by creating a product
in a module, then referencing it in e.g. a sales order,
then updating the module after changing the product
record to be in a `noupdate` block.
At the end of the update the implicit product.template
record would be garbage collected, and trigger a cascade
deletion of its children - blocked by the SO reference
to the product.
This temporary patch was used to simulate the presence of a
`display_name` field in all models. It is not needed anymore
as of version 8.0, which comes with the actual magic to make
`display_name` work everywhere.
Improve commit bf31ab6718:
- do not use the product.product name_search() when there is no
search term (it's only useful with a search term
- do not use the product.product name_search() when the extra
domain (args) has a criterion on IDs - these will be *template*
ids, not *variant* ids, so the results would be wrong
- Since templates and variants use a different natural `_order`,
perform an extra name_search() on templates after gathering the
ids to return, to apply the proper sort ordering. Increases the
penalty by doing 2 name_search() calls.
This issue could be seen e.g. in the breadcrumbs where the
display_name variable is displayed for templates, and indirectly
relies on name_search() due to an old hack in call_kw in order to
implement the "future_display_name".
a6eac0f08e introduced a new `res.groups`
belonging to the "Sharing" category.
As this group has the flag `shared`, it is ignore when generating the
group's user view (and its virtual fields).
When updating `mail` module, the `share` module (which depend on mail)
is not loaded yet. This mean this new group is taken into account when
getting the `res.users` virtual fields.
As this group belong to the same category as the `share.group_share_user`
group but dont have an inheritance link between them (`implied_ids`),
they are generated as `boolean` instead of a single entry `selection`
field. This create a missmatch between the fields and the previously
generated view, which forbid inheritance application.
Force view regeneration, to avoid it.
Also change the group's category as this group is purely technical and
must be hidden anyway.
When the theoretical_qty of the stock is calculated, we should only consider the location itself, not its children.
That way you can have correct inventory for e.g. iPads that are both in Stock and Stock/Shelf 1
During the creation of a Sale Order containing a product for which 'Make To Order' is activated
in the Procurements, two procurements are created:
- one for 'Partner Locations/Customers' location
- one for 'WH/Stock' location
If the Sale Order if cancelled, the user must first cancel the picking (delivery order).
This will trigger the cancellation of the procurement with the 'Partner Locations/Customers'
location.
The new behavior is to cancel the procurements linked to the Sale Order, which will trigger
the cancellation of the picking.
opw: 630170
issue: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/3805
The invalidation in registry was done only if the field's model was already in
registry. This situation is not the case when you create a custom model with a
custom field.
If "Group Journal Items" option is checked, the generated accounting entries may get an invalid tax amout.
This will happen when several entries for the same product do not use the same tax amout (e.g. discount).
Avoid grouping products with different taxes under the same line by creating one line per tax_code_id.
opw 626695
The result of the residual amount of an asset is : asset.purchase_value - amount - asset.salvage_value
where purchase_value and asset.salvage_value are in the currency of the asset. Amount is the difference
between debit and credit of an account move line expressed in the currency of the company.
This is why the amount must be convert in the currency of the asset.
It's better for SEO to have tags slugged in url
tag=1,2 => tag=website-1,functionnal-2
It allow to keep the retro-compatibility with v8 and google links.
Retro-compatibily for V8 and google links.
More than 25 000 links in google contains ?sorting=date
Since saas-6, sorting is directly used in query, so we need to
check that the sorting is still valid !
Since commit 0167acb, the template used in translate_doc are added to the list
of template when we are editing a report with the html editor.
It's nice, but we don't have all the dependicies from this one.
Now we recompute the list of template, to have all the related templates:
the external_layer* and all templates which overload this report.
When displaying a field, it is usually preferable to use the 't-field' qweb tag
to avoid access problems: the name_get is automatic so you don't need to access
the model sub-field (in this case, you don't need to access the res.partner name)
Olivier Dony