Previously to commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/531d641375f5cee7d3a5e629f6b1eaceee8b2739 website
menus checkboxes change did remove all menu entries. They were then
created again depending on checked entries.
That commit changed that behavior to try to create only missing menu
entries and remove only extra entries. However the extra entries removal
was not correctly done.
This commit now checks existing menu entries and remove menu entries that
should not exist depending on checked options. Only standard menu entries
are removed aka menu entries generated by the event module. This means
custom menu entries added for the event should be kept to avoid loosing
customization.
Purpose
=======
When sending a proforma by email, the email template is correclty rendered. But 'Quotation #' id displayed on the printed report instead of 'Pro-forma' #
Specification
=============
- Retrieve correctly the context key in the template
- Remove the associated ir.actions.report.xml as we cannot pass a specific context from there
By default auto_search is set to `True` on window actions, this mean
that for example on a list or kanban view the records will be searched
on the view opening without any user action needed.
Setting it to `False` disable this.
Doing this had two drawbacks:
- depending on race condition, the view could be displayed before the
search view was loaded,
- the code expected `active_search` to be present which was not the case
in this instance.
Before 151c9074 the second issue would not happen (active_search was set
directly resolved if a search was not to be done) and this commit also
wait for the search view being ready before showing the view.
opw-741186
opw-741546
closes#16805
When you send a mass mailing to muiltiple partner, if some of them have
no email adresse, it can lead to errors because of the variable 'recips'
is not set if the first occurence in the 'for loop' has no email.
To fix this, we always set the variable 'recips' by replacing the 'elif'
close by a 'else' one
introduced in rev: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/65ed4553a50fdbefc986b7d21f87a81c42b743c7
- Create an article with one supplierinfo (with a delivery delay and a
min. quantity > 0) and a customer delivery delay
- Trigger the creation of a PO by a procurement order for this article
The supplier delivery delay is not taken into account in the date order
of the PO because the seller is not selected.
This is because the procurement quantity is not sent to the seller
selection.
opw-16702
Closes#16702
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create two products A and B that require a serial number
2. Create a product C with no trcking
3. Create a BOM for a A with two components B an C
4. Create a MO for A with qty > 1
5. Check availabiltity and produce the first A
6. Record the SN for the first assembly
Bug: When producing the second assembly, it was not possible to
record the SN for the components.
opw:741316
When multiple clicking fast (and with the server not too fast), we could
end up with an error (eg. "Cannot read property 'controller' of null").
Something has been done previously to improve this when switching
between views in: fc8a4b5e. This commit do something similar to limit
multiple click on kanban records (doing it as in 26f91c429).
opw-705329
closes#16698
Before this commit, the filtering brought by commit ca989b6 did not work when
no email_to was present. Which is the case for mass-mailings based on
res.partner records.
OPW 728321
Closes#16745
Issue: 741582
This bug happens when you click multiple time quickly on 'run scheduler' button
or if you call 'run reordering rules' and then 'run scheduler' rapidly
It could create duplicate PO or MO.
This happens because the run_scheduler function free the lock while it should
not. ProcurementSudo was created with the old cursor that contains the lock and
the record set that search returns also contains this cursor. The run will call the record set with the bad cursor and commit the lock instead of the wanted
behavior.
This commit creates the ProcurementSudo with the new cursor that does not
contains the lock.
- Create 5 PO with 40 lines each for Partner A
- Create an invoice
- Add each PO thanks to the field "Add Purchase Order"
The process takes more and more time for each PO.
Most of the time is spent in the recomputation of the secondary fields
(in the `onchange` method of "models.py"). The root cause is the cache
invalidation due to the relational fields recomputed as superuser by
default.
opw-740485
Before this commit, when the user modified the dashboard, it was not always visible without refreshing the web client
For example, display the current dashboard, then go to another view and add an extra view in the dashboard, then go back to the dashboard.
The reason is that the dashboard layout is actually stored in the arch of a form view, and that arch is cached by the data manager.
This is why each change to the dashboard arch requires that we clear the cache.
OPW 740739
Closes#16691
Since the account is a mandatory field, we raise an clear error is no
account is defined.
This is necessary when running an automatic reconciliation on the POS.
The POS uses a try/except to avoid any error, but in the case of an SQL
error, the cursor is invalidated, so the transaction fails.
opw-741677
In PostgreSQL, a field of type `integer` must be in the range
-2147483648 to +2147483647. If the user enters a lower or a larger
value, a traceback is thrown.
opw-740286
When a invoice line is create a default layout_category_sequence was created
with a value of 0, updating the value of layout_category_id.sequence instead
of fetching it.
This operation was very slow on the invoice creation wizard
opw-741517
- Create a SO of 1000
- Create a down payment of 300, validate
- Create the final invoice
In the partner view, a total of 1600 is displayed as invoiced.
In the case of a down payment, the corresponding invoice line has an
amount with a negative sign. Since the report computes the absolute
value before multiplying by the sign, this information is lost.
The absolute value is not necessary since `price_subtotal_signed`
already includes the correct sign.
opw-741159
The calendar view display records with the start corresponding to the
record field set as `date_start`, and the stop to the record field set
as `date_stop`.
Since ef886aed2 there some issue when mingling calendar with
`date_start` or `date_stop` date fields and `all_day` unset:
- if user had timezone between UTC+8 and UTC+14, when moving as
"All day", the record start would be saved on the previous day.
- if used had timezone between UTC-12 and UTC-5, when moving as
"All day", the record end would get on the following day.
- if the event was moved onto a given time (in the "Day view"), the
event start would be set to the previous day if it was before midnight
in UTC time, and the end would be set on the following day if it was
after UTC 23:59.
The source of the issue was that after ef886aed2 a datetime was always
sent to the server, so depending on the browser timezone the server
could for example receive '2017-04-27 23:00' instead of '2017-04-28'.
This fix go back to the previous behavior.
fixes#15540
opw-15540
closes#16698
Odoo Translation Bot